A Primark security guard who forced young girls to carry out sex acts after they were caught shoplifting, has been convicted of rape.
Zia Uddin took advantage of CCTV blind spots to abuse four 15-year-olds while working at the Kingston branch of the clothing retailer in 2017.
After catching his vulnerable victims shoplifting, Kingston Crown Court heard that the 27-year-old would threaten the children - saying their parents and the police would be contacted, and that they would be detained for a considerable amount of time, unless they did as he said.
He then made clear that the only way for them to be let go without punishment was to perform sexual acts.
My suggestion is if men cannot control their sexual feelings...get themselves done like the cat
and stick to gambling and alcohol...save themselves a life in prison
Being done should be offered free on the National health service, if it cuts all this appalling rape, sexual abuse and paedophilia.
It will be well worth it.
My suggestion is if men cannot control their sexual feelings...get themselves done like the catand stick to gambling and alcohol...save themselves a life in prisonBeing done should be offered free on the National health service, if it cuts all this a
I'm just kidding. But in all honesty this abuse of authority should be more common. I doubt there are many white british security guards working in stores like these. At least in Germany, a security guard is a popular immigrant job because they naturally don't give many fecks and don't have to speak German on the job.
I'm just kidding. But in all honesty this abuse of authority should be more common. I doubt there are many white british security guards working in stores like these. At least in Germany, a security guard is a popular immigrant job because they natur
Let's see if you'll be as quick to explain how if you jump five feet on to a twenty ton block of concrete you are unharmed but if a twenty ton block of concrete falls five feet on to you the results are somewhat different.
And then go on to explain why this concept does not apply when aeroplanes and high rise buildings are concerned
Let's see if you'll be as quick to explain how if you jump five feet on to a twenty ton block of concrete you are unharmed but if a twenty ton block of concrete falls five feet on to you the results are somewhat different. And then go on to explain w
Another denier ffs, They are everywhere .. YOU EXPLAIN TO ME HOW PLANES (IE) COMMERCIAL AIRLINERS DISAPPEAR INTO BUILDINGS WHEN FLYING AT IMPOSSIBLE SPEEDS. AND THEN MAGICALLY VANISHING INTO THE ABYSS
OMFG
I am waiting.
1. Newton’s Third Law of Motion: “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” An aluminum plane hitting a thick steel beam will have the same effect as steel beam being swung at the same speed and hitting the plane. It makes no difference which one is moving as to the effect on the plane and the beam. In both cases the thick steel beam will do damage to the plane and the beam will emerge relatively undamaged. The faster the speed at the point of impact, the more damage that will be done to the plane. Try punching a steel girder. No matter how fast your hand is traveling, you will not be able to break through it; you will eventually break your hand. It matters not if the girder is swung at your hand or you swing your hand at the girder; assuming the impact is at the same speed, the injury to your hand would be the same.
Another denier ffs, They are everywhere .. YOU EXPLAIN TO ME HOW PLANES (IE) COMMERCIAL AIRLINERS DISAPPEAR INTO BUILDINGS WHEN FLYING AT IMPOSSIBLE SPEEDS. AND THEN MAGICALLY VANISHING INTO THE ABYSS OMFG I am waiting. 1. Newton’s Third Law of Mo
Goosey ... come out fron behind the sofa.. you play with fire YOU WILL GET BURNT
Let’s apply Newton’s Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11 story, Flight 175 strikes the South Tower at 450 m.p.h. Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h. and struck a stationary Flight 175. We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged. We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower. Any video that shows an aluminum airplane with a fibreglass nose cone gliding through a steel and concrete building violates Newton’s Laws of Motion.
Unless of course it is filmed at Hollywood or in Mexicos fantasy world of science
Goosey ... come out fron behind the sofa.. you play with fire YOU WILL GET BURNT Let’s apply Newton’s Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11 story, Flight 175 strikes the South Tower at 450 m.p.h. Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h
In the impact videos, notably the Hezarkhani, Luc Courchesne, Spiegel TV and Evan Fairbanks videos we see what we are told is a plane cartoonishly pass through the steel face of the tower like a ghost. As the alleged plane makes contact with the tower there is no bending, buckling or breaking of the plane. No wings breaking or other parts of the plane breaking apart. This is impossible. It is cartoon physics. It melts into the side of the tower like a knife through butter. The “plane” we are told is Flight 175 is depicted as being simultaneously both half in the South Tower and still completely intact, a pair of buildings made with 200,000 tons of steel each. When the tip of the plane’s fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up. That would cause the wings to break off.
Any thoughts GOOSEY ? Anything at all ? Surely you have some of mexicos notes to work from ?
In the impact videos, notably the Hezarkhani, Luc Courchesne, Spiegel TV and Evan Fairbanks videos we see what we are told is a plane cartoonishly pass through the steel face of the tower like a ghost. As the alleged plane makes contact with the towe
And if you combine it with the weapon of champions, PROPAGANDA , you can have the world on toast
But hey what do i know.. I am but a mere looker upper according to the book of Charlie
And if you combine it with the weapon of champions, PROPAGANDA , you can have the world on toast But hey what do i know.. I am but a mere looker upper according to the book of Charlie
Instead of reposting copied versions of what supposedly didn't happen, why don't you tell the thousands of families who never saw their family members again after the incidents of that particular day where they are and what happened to them.
Instead of reposting copied versions of what supposedly didn't happen, why don't you tell the thousands of families who never saw their family members again after the incidents of that particular day where they are and what happened to them.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I think there is a link between despicable and unlawful sexual activities and a specific immigrant community.
Remember the behaviour of that copper on duty looking after the property of a dead child whose parents were out whilst waiting for the funeral service to arrive? He accessed porn courtesy of Branson's broadband. How despicable was that!
I'm fairly convinced there is a deep-rooted sexual issue within this community - it always seems to happen with one of theirs. Or am I too hasty in my conclusion?
However, I do agree with chemical castration or physical castration to minimise risks to young vulnerable white females from some within this community.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I think there is a link between despicable and unlawful sexual activities and a specific immigrant community. Remember the behaviour of that copper on duty looking after the property of a dead child whose parents were
Angoose13 Nov 19 16:48Joined: 18 Jul 02 | Topic/replies: 10,175 | Blogger: Angoose's blog That would appear to make two of us then.
I think you will find there are a lot more than that goosey. A lot more
Easier to spout nonsense than to try and fully comprehend anything
Never mind. I have added you to the list
Happy Daze
Angoose13 Nov 19 16:48Joined: 18 Jul 02 | Topic/replies: 10,175 | Blogger: Angoose's blogThat would appear to make two of us then.I think you will find there are a lot more than that goosey. A lot more Easier to spout nonsense than to try and fully c
I'm fairly convinced there is a deep-rooted sexual issue within this community - it always seems to happen with one of theirs. Or am I too hasty in my conclusion?
It's an absolutely vital question, which sadly no-one in the Home Office wants to ask. Less still of course Her Majesty's Opposition. They prefer to sack MPs from the Shadow Cabinet who dare to raise this issue and risk losing the Sharia Law Block Vote.
A root cause analysis into the industrial scale rape of sexually-underaged white girls, by non-white followers of Peaceful Religions, is the very least that is necessary given the astonishing scale of this problem.
I'm fairly convinced there is a deep-rooted sexual issue within this community - it always seems to happen with one of theirs. Or am I too hasty in my conclusion? It's an absolutely vital question, which sadly no-one in the Home Office wants to ask.
BBC have picked up on the Pleasure Marriage business and fair play to them, Their focus was on the Middle east but it would not surprise me where it is Going on , It is a short term arrangement to enable Men to have sex with females ,Sometimes a few days and then Divorce ,Girls family is paid money , THERE IS NO LOWER AGE LIMIT ...
As Alun said with Plenty of Followers in the UK ,who knows ??
Alun Spot on ...BBC have picked up on the Pleasure Marriage business and fair play to them, Their focus was on the Middle east but it would not surprise me where it is Going on , It is a short term arrangement to enable Men to have sex with females ,
We live in a society which highlights sex as never before.
It is all over our media.
Also women are more and more in men's faces, everything men do, they want to do.
In the past there were men's and women's institutions, clubs where either sex could get away form the either, these have all been
stopped on the grounds of discrimination.
On evolutionary grounds women are for sex, that is how men see them.
Muslims are brought up in societies where women are always hidden behind veils.
None of this justifies rape or sexual abuse of women, particularly under age women.
But it is so much men's faces now, than when I was young. That was why I suggested chemical or physical castration
We can go on blaming and punishing Muslims, we have no choice if they are guilty, but we do need to look at this a bit harder
I feel.
We live in a society which highlights sex as never before.It is all over our media. Also women are more and more in men's faces, everything men do, they want to do.In the past there were men's and women's institutions, clubs where either sex could ge
My local/non-local women friends said they could bring home any male friends except those from South Asia; their parents would disown them if they did. They loath them beyond contempt; arrogant, double-standard and disrespectful to women.
My local/non-local women friends said they could bring home any male friends except those from South Asia; their parents would disown them if they did. They loath them beyond contempt; arrogant, double-standard and disrespectful to women.
Women get my respect when they show respect to me, if they don't, I don't give them any, seems fair to me
They cannot expect a free lunch.
Well they don't have tp bring them homeWomen get my respect when they show respect to me, if they don't, I don't give them any, seems fair to meThey cannot expect a free lunch.
Muslims are brought up in societies where women are always hidden behind veils.
Yes women are treated as 2nd Class , The chaps read a book from day 1 ,where a man who is the leader has several Wives including a seven year old girl , If you Explain to them any thing in the book is Wrong or Untrue , you will be accused of blasphemy , now you may think this will be Hard Liners , it is not I had work friend years back born and bred in London , who was a Muslim , when I told him Adam & Eve was Just a story , He said that was Blasphemy .............. Its nothing to do with women being in their face ..
There are many Muslims who do not attack women , sadly we have enclaves nationwide where it appears to be the Done thing to Abuse young white Girls ...........
Muslims are brought up in societies where women are always hidden behind veils. Yes women are treated as 2nd Class , The chaps read a book from day 1 ,where a man who is the leader has several Wives including a seven year old girl , If you Explain t
Individually I find them ok for a short period or a day at work, but collectively a no, no; irritatingly arrogant; possess unfounded confidence in most things; likes to take over - not a team player. To most will say yes to a task even when the task is totally foreign or require experience or know-how to accomplish.
Individually I find them ok for a short period or a day at work, but collectively a no, no; irritatingly arrogant; possess unfounded confidence in most things; likes to take over - not a team player. To most will say yes to a task even when the task
When I was younger in the 1960's and 1970's we had Muslims
from Pakistan?
They were not liked tbh...but we did not experience what we are experiencing now
So what has changed?????????
When I was younger in the 1960's and 1970's we had Muslimsfrom Pakistan?They were not liked tbh...but we did not experience what we are experiencing nowSo what has changed?????????
In the 1960 and 1970 the world was smaller with no mobile, internet or computer. Also, I believe there is an identity crisis with men from that community possibly influenced by world politics and distraction/attraction of western culture/life.
In the 1960 and 1970 the world was smaller with no mobile, internet or computer. Also, I believe there is an identity crisis with men from that community possibly influenced by world politics and distraction/attraction of western culture/life.
Not sure how mobile,Internet or computer affects this....and we did have Vietnam, in the 1960's and 1970's or the Yanks did.
Your second point has substance impossible123. I agree.
Not sure how mobile,Internet or computer affects this....and we did have Vietnam, in the 1960's and 1970's or the Yanks did.Your second point has substance impossible123. I agree.
I think to be on the Sex Register is insufficient punishment (it could be considered a kudos to some). May I suggest wearing an arm tag for the same longevity as his sentence perhaps post release; vermin like him must not be allowed to repeat his heinous crime. If so castration a must.
I think to be on the Sex Register is insufficient punishment (it could be considered a kudos to some). May I suggest wearing an arm tag for the same longevity as his sentence perhaps post release; vermin like him must not be allowed to repeat his hei