Don't let your daughter go to Primark

Don't shoplift.

My cat is happy, does not get in terrible fights he used to.

Yes

Usual nonsense from detroller

Blaming 15 year old girls who have been sexually abused ffs

well done John that was quick from you.

contrary to popular belief mind

lol Angoose.

Another denier ffs, They are everywhere .. YOU EXPLAIN TO ME HOW PLANES (IE) COMMERCIAL AIRLINERS DISAPPEAR INTO BUILDINGS WHEN FLYING AT IMPOSSIBLE SPEEDS. AND THEN MAGICALLY VANISHING INTO THE ABYSS

OMFG

I am waiting.

1. Newton’s Third Law of Motion: “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.”
An aluminum plane hitting a thick steel beam will have the same effect as steel beam being swung at the same speed and hitting the plane. It makes no difference which one is moving as to the effect on the plane and the beam. In both cases the thick steel beam will do damage to the plane and the beam will emerge relatively undamaged. The faster the speed at the point of impact, the more damage that will be done to the plane. Try punching a steel girder. No matter how fast your hand is traveling, you will not be able to break through it; you will eventually break your hand. It matters not if the girder is swung at your hand or you swing your hand at the girder; assuming the impact is at the same speed, the injury to your hand would be the same.

Angoose  yet another popular follower of official narratives..... no matter how how the lie they jump for it

Come on goosey what you got ?

Goosey ... come out fron behind the sofa.. you play with fire YOU WILL GET BURNT

Let’s apply Newton’s Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11 story, Flight 175 strikes the South Tower at 450 m.p.h. Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h. and struck a stationary Flight 175. We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged. We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower. Any video that shows an aluminum airplane with a fibreglass nose cone gliding through a steel and concrete building violates Newton’s Laws of Motion.

Unless of course it is filmed at Hollywood or in Mexicos fantasy world of science

In the impact videos, notably the Hezarkhani, Luc Courchesne, Spiegel TV and Evan Fairbanks videos we see what we are told is a plane cartoonishly pass through the steel face of the tower like a ghost. As the alleged plane makes contact with the tower there is no bending, buckling or breaking of the plane. No wings breaking or other parts of the plane breaking apart. This is impossible. It is cartoon physics. It melts into the side of the tower like a knife through butter. The “plane” we are told is Flight 175 is depicted as being simultaneously both half in the South Tower and still completely intact, a pair of buildings made with 200,000 tons of steel each. When the tip of the plane’s fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up. That would cause the wings to break off.

Any thoughts GOOSEY ?  Anything at all ? Surely you have some of mexicos notes to work from ?

ROFFLE. goosey the comedian. Yep. Great stuff. You have goosed yourself with me for sure.

Now i have your card marked i will be looking out for you and bring you to your knees like all of the other troops of the official narratives.

Keep up the good work John.

Nearly finished here DT. Killed half an hour b4 Tea

Goosey, you lack research m8. Go away and have another look at it..

Please correct me if I'm wrong. I think there is a link between despicable and unlawful sexual activities and a specific immigrant community.

Remember the behaviour of that copper on duty looking after the property of a dead child whose parents were out whilst waiting for the funeral service to arrive? He accessed porn courtesy of Branson's broadband. How despicable was that!

I'm fairly convinced there is a deep-rooted sexual issue within this community - it always seems to happen with one of theirs. Or am I too hasty in my conclusion?

However, I do agree with chemical castration or physical castration to minimise risks to young vulnerable white females from some within this community.

I'm fairly convinced there is a deep-rooted sexual issue within this community - it always seems to happen with one of theirs. Or am I too hasty in my conclusion?

It's an absolutely vital question, which sadly no-one in the Home Office wants to ask. Less still of course Her Majesty's Opposition. They prefer to sack MPs from the Shadow Cabinet who dare to raise this issue and risk losing the Sharia Law Block Vote.

A root cause analysis into the industrial scale rape of sexually-underaged white girls, by non-white followers of Peaceful Religions, is the very least that is necessary given the astonishing scale of this problem.