Chit Chat
IT WAS 18 YEARS AGO
|
By:
Some many experts in so many fields asking so many questions and yet we have a couple of trolls defending the murder of nearly 3,000 on that horrid day,blaming others for it--racist scum.
|
|
By:
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Judy_Wood
Dr Wood's observation of the destruction of the World Trade Center on 11 September 2001 led her to the conviction that the towers did not collapse but were "dustified" by a directed energy weapon. According to her, dustification involves molecular dissociation and transmutation. Another nutter. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Good old Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld.
Impossible to imagine either or them being involved in any nefarious activities! |
|
By:
Pillars of society
 |
|
By:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-rumsfeld-and-the-s_b_805581
Such a trustworthy man! He really really cares about the American people |
|
By:
Delightful isn't he
|
|
By:
I see why a troll would try so hard to discredit what this experts has to say--f ucking hell this is serious stuff "WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO"?
|
|
By:
IRREFUTABLE terry lad IRREFUTABLE
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Making you look for it detroller.. Maybe in the hope some of it slips down your neck somehow
 |
|
By:
What did my m8 mexico make of this lot of evidence ? Did he take time off from his latest project for nasa ( sending a man to the north pole apparently
) so as to review it ? https://911planeshoax.com/2014/01/11/proof-that-no-real-planes-were-used-on-911/ |
|
By:
Did you have a butchers at that Terry lad ?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Take it up with Newton. Maybe you can help mexico rewrite the laws of physics
|
|
By:
Aluminium box section thru reinforced steel ?????
|
|
By:
If it wasnt so tragic it would actually be funny
|
|
By:
You see, what you dont understand is i dont have to answer anything . I just give you the evidence to challenge the deception you believe. If you still want to run with them beliefs you have then feel free. I cannot alter that belief system you have firmly in place. I Just give you food for thought to question everything for yourself. Do not believe everything they tell you
This world is nothing like you think it is  |
|
By:
What I don't understand is how stupid you have to be to think that you falling on an object will do the same damage to you and the object falling on you.
As you say, you don't have to answer anything. Im just giving you food for thought. |
|
By:
He had time to think about it.
But has decided to present the same argument regardless. |
|
By:
WTF are you on about John.
There is nothing in Newton's laws which say a fast moving plane won't damage a building. All we established John, is that your knowledge of Physics is almost nonexistent. You could not even answer that really simple Physics question which probed your garbage post was totally incorrect. |
|
By:
The link he gave is extremely funny. This is a classic:
Birds are light, which is how they are able to fly. Yet, look at the damage the birds do to an aircraft. If a bird can do that degree of damage to a plane what chance would a plane have against robust steel columns at the World Trade Center? He sort of got the point then completely forgot it. |
|
By:
A no mark troll is calling an expert who backs up all she says a "nutter"-yeah righty -o then
|
|
By:
Thanks John. Lets let these racist liars **** together
|
|
By:
Betfair, c um only has 3 letters,where did the 4th one c um from?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Comedy value in Terry calling other users "racist liars"
This is from the lad who claimed he bought a copy of Agenda21 and looked at the maps in the document. This from the lad posting racist lies about Rothchild & Henry Kissinger (& many others) John why would you post anything you claim is Physics related? It is clear you don't have any knowledge of the subject. |
|
By:
How about we all start behaving like adults and reach an agreement?
For instance I can live with the missiles painted as airplanes theory for the twin towers. Pentagon was hit by a missile. Shanksville was just a hole dug up, no plane involved. In return John gives up his physics theory and terry stops posting on 9/11(5G should keep him busy for a few years). What you guys say? |
|
By:
Detraveller
Happy to discuss any theory but really do need to know what the theory is before discussing it. Explaining what believe did happen should be on page 1 of the book. It is not a trick question to ask what happened. John is an embarrassment posting "Physics " when a child could tell it is garbabage. Would behaving like adults mean not swearing & no racist posts? If so I doubt our KKK member would agree. |
|
By:
mexico...the theory is that the planes involved on 9/11 were to some degree fake
I believe this idea is an extremely high barrier for most people to overcome however, my views are that this... Pentagon was hit by a missile. Shanksville was just a hole dug up, no plane involved. is completely correct reason being that I see no evidence of a plane having crashed at either sites if you google plane crashes on land, parts of the plane fuselage are visible post-crash in all pictures you don't see plane fuselage at either the pentagon or shanksville on 9/11 |
|
By:
Wonder
You are unique in the 9/11 conspiracy believers in the fact you actually express an opinion as to what happened. It is the WTC crash which has many witnesses so I believe it was 2 planes which crashed. I do respect you for actually expressing a theory you believe in - John & the racist refuse to do that. Although Tery has recently posted a link to suggest he believes planes crashed into WTC - needless to say he refused to answer any questions regarding his new beliefs. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Tell us mex about the hurricane off New York the night before and the reasons behind it-ta.
|
|
By:
welcome wondersobright.
https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/369576713144561832/ That sure does look like evidence of a plane crash to me. You can see the fuselage-- but it's in thousands of pieces because that what happens in plane crashes. The first crash I thought of to make a comparison was the concorde crash. Again fuselage in thousands of pieces. |
|
By:
Give us a link Terry
What was the name of the hurricane. WTF has it got to do with planes crashing into WTC - as you have said happened?? |
|
By:
Truth is starting to come out-please Good Lord not to late
|
|
By:
JML...you've been duped by a bad photoshopping job
so if you google united airlines 93 crash, that is the only photo where any significant plane parts (wings etc) are showing reason being that plane is white and therefore cannot be UA93 as UA93 was dark blue & grey  also, plane parts of that size would be unmissable even from ground level, and all the video footage from that day shows no sign of any plane parts |
|
By:
Have you any evidence it's a bad photoshopping job.
If you want to show me a particular photo it's best to post a link. Shame you failed to comment on the Concorde crash scene. |
|
By:
I've just provided you with the evidence
the plane is the wrong colour & this massive amount of "plane" wreckage cannot be seen in any other photo or video from that day |
|
By:
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-aviation-concorde-crash-site-gonesse-106402680.html
significant size plane parts there |