|
By:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/853530.stm
and there |
|
By:
I'll quote myself here.
I've posted many times on the difference between a high-impact crash and those occurring at take-off or landing. There is a huge difference. I suggest you look into the differences and then reconsider your opinion. Have you done this wonder? |
|
By:
The UA93 was dark blue and grey but the wings were white.
In fact it's very unusual for wings to be any other colour. |
|
By:
Another way to look at the same thing.
Where did the plane, and all of the people onboard it, go? Whilst not always the most reliable of sites, have a look at the relevant Wikipedia page. It includes relevant photographs of wreckage along with links to the material referenced within the page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_93 |
|
By:
The flight had taken off at 8:01 from Newark, N.J., bound for San Francisco. But as it passed south of Cleveland, Ohio, it took a sudden, violent left turn and headed inexplicably back into Pennsylvania. As the 757 and its 38 passengers and seven crew members blew past Pittsburgh, air-traffic controllers tried frantically to raise the crew via radio. There was no response.
Forty miles further down the new flight path, in rural Somerset County, Terry Butler, 40, was pulling the radiator from a gray 1992 Dodge Caravan at the junkyard where he works. He had been watching the news and knew all flights were supposed to be grounded. He was stunned when he looked up in the sky and saw Flight 93 cutting through the lingering morning fog. "It was moving like you wouldn't believe," he said. The rogue plane soared over woodland, cattle pastures and cornfields until it passed over Kelly Leverknight's home. She too was watching the news. Her husband, on his regular tour of duty with the Air National Guard's 167th Airlift Wing in Martinsburg, W.Va., had just called to reassure his wife that his base was still operating normally when she heard the plane rush by. "It was headed toward the school," she said, the school where her three children were. Had Flight 93 stayed aloft a few seconds longer, it would have ploughed into Shanksville-Stonycreek School and its 501 students, grades K through 12. Instead, at 10:06 a.m., the plane smashed into a reclaimed section of an old coal strip mine. The largest pieces of the plane still extant are barely bigger than a telephone book. "I just keep thinking--two miles," said elementary principal Rosemarie Tipton. "There but for the grace of God--two miles." http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,174655-4,00.html By Nancy Gibbs Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2001 |
|
By:
Good point Angoose--I'm not keen on any conspiracy theory that involves more than about 5
people at most.But on this thread we're well into the hundreds of co conspirators. |
|
By:
so which is it?
this... https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/113856696808963105/?lp=true or this? The largest pieces of the plane still extant are barely bigger than a telephone book |
|
By:
I have no idea what Nancy Gibbs had seen prior to filing her piece that was published on the day following the incidents.
If you read her article though, it is evidently clear that her approach is that of human interest rather than a forensic engineering study. |
|
By:
How many people would it have taken to dig this hole and fake the crash site? And how long?
No shortage of people saw the plane crash but no one seems to notice this hole being dug, which is a coincidence because no one noticed the explosives being placed in the building. So we are back to providing evidence that the photo was photoshopped. The largest pieces of the plane still extant are barely bigger than a telephone book totally meaningless out of context. |
|
By:
who said anything about people digging a hole?
all I've said is I don't think it was UA93 |
|
By:
however, my views are that this...
Pentagon was hit by a missile. Shanksville was just a hole dug up, no plane involved. is completely correct reason being that I see no evidence of a plane having crashed at either sites |
|
By:
exactly
|
|
By:
you introduced the people digging the hole, not me
|
|
By:
Detroller :
How about you realise this is not my disclosure about the physics. They are the current laws of physics which we work with !!!!!! When i research ( sorry look into as Charlie prefers that ) I look at what the evidence tells me . Not what MMS and forum no marks spew out. I have no interest in the Hollywood movie which shows the Wile E Coyote silhouette punctured holes in the buildings. God give me strength !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I looked at numerous conclusions and decided that the official spin was indeed just that. Those commercial planes would have broken up on impact as per the reasoning, they would not have disappeared into the abyss of the steel constructed fortress. Far too much evidence to make me think anything else, however, everyone is entitled to their own opinion ![]() Far too much information included in that simple document * to show the reasoning offered makes sense. Mex.. As well as dissing the current laws of physics you have offered a new word for us to decipher ...garbabage You really are a waste of space. No theories just appraisal of evidence. You don't have theories when you do that. Read this presentation again and see if you can understand it .. although i doubt it. * https://911planeshoax.com/2014/01/11/proof-that-no-real-planes-were-used-on-911/ * “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” — ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER, German philosopher (1788–1860). Enjoy your evening ![]() |
|
By:
Far too much evidence to make me think anything else
And obviously far to much evidence to share and discuss. |
|
By:
Do you think he’s on a big wind up or does he actually believe the nonsense on that website?
|
|
By:
At the moment I'm not 100% sure.
He's on a completely different intellectual level to McCann but at the moment he's nothing more than a preacher. |
|
By:
John
It is obvious you did not study Physics even to O level/ GCSE level. That is a very basic level where children are introduced to Newton's laws. No calculus needed at that level yet you fail. John you must realise you have zero understanding of Newton's laws so why post such rubbish. Clearly you would fail any common sense & logic test . You still haven't answered that simple Physics question regarding energy of objects of different masses travelling at the same velocity. Why post lies John? |
|
By:
Jesus H, is this still running?. An immutable, subject where we don't even have a vote. I'm sure Trumpy tunes in every night to CC to decide his next move.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
I did an internship at Illuminati in 2009 and my supervisor told me 9/11 was planned in Ingolstadt to make America invade Afghanistan. But they had a mole and the Americans found out. The original plan only had three planes crashing into the towers
SO when the americans found out they did two things. One they faked an attack on Pentagon so they could burn some files currently they were under investigation for. Second they set up explosives in the twin towers and WTC7 so that they could bring the buildings down and surprise the illuminati people. On the day of the attack two planes crashed into the twin towers but the one that was supposed to crash into WTC7 had already crashed in Shanksville. It was too late though and the WTC7 explosives went off exactly when they were supposed to and brought the building down. True story. |
|
By:
Since when did America start killing their own to go to war, FFS, do you really believe what you think?. I suppose Hitlers crimes against the world (your legacy) twist your reasoning, or lack of.
|
|
By:
Were you recruited by Adam Weishaupt?
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
When losing revert to puerile gestures, grow up!.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Pearl harbour, REALLY!!. My talking to morons allocation is fully used up, detroller how do you ever find time to bet, or is spouting drivel on here your raison d'être.
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I'm just amazed how much faith people have in their governments!
Is it naivety or some kind of national pride? |
|
By:
I trust govts as much as I trust the Pak cricket team!
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
DT if tomorrow the headline was that the US was behind 9/11, what would your level of surprise be
1 = not at all 10 = very surprised |
|
By:
Oh dear, carry on kiddies, carry on hating, carry on indulging in conspiracy theories about things over which you have no influence let alone a say. Feeling 'empowered' with ones own scribbles on a (dimishing) gambooooling forum must be so fullfilling.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
De troller, as you may , or most probably may not realise, I don't post on here 24/7/365. I do realise what your arrogant replies are about, you have already stated that half on here are brain dead in your Germanic estimation.
You obviously despise anyone on here who disagrees with you, takes me back in history to the 1930s. Mimicking is a way you Germanicaly think is clever or intelegent/satirical, ....it is actually way out of date by decades. You pontificate on everything!, fckn hell you must be a genius. ![]() |
|
By:
As I mentioned, this thread is exactly about what you are accusing me to be.
There's a guy here who thinks 6 billion people will be killed by 5G by 2025. There's another who says if you dropped yourself on a block of concrete, the damage done to your body will be the same as if the concrete block was dropped on you. There's another who's been searching for answers for over a year now and is on autopilot now. Pardon me for my arrogance and pontification(whatever that means) Stay here long enough and you'll go crazy like the rest of us. Or just take it easy and live with the way we all are. |
|
By:
I see I may have offended you with the barbarian poking his nose pic. That wasn't meant as a response to you, I keep posting these pics at random. When you asked me when did america start killing their own to go to war, I didn't respond because the illuminati story was obviously made up(exactly what others do on this thread, I was just doing my part). I can understand it may have come across as arrogant as I didn't respond to you then and instead posted that pic.
I own the rest of the nonsense I post though. I just request you not to take any of it seriousy. |
|
By:
Fir enough detraveller, reasonable responses eruditely elucidated. I was being unfair
to you, and acknowledge that fact. My 'broad brush' criticisms of your origins were also wrong, and you not rising to the bait is indeed a credit to you. I will cease and desist as of now and wish you a fond good day. ![]() |