tims correct was odds against after heroics in world cup - around 11/8 mark but around 1/3 at last look tea time after the innings of all innings - the biggest cert for many a year
tims correct was odds against after heroics in world cup - around 11/8 mark but around 1/3 at last look tea time after the innings of all innings - the biggest cert for many a year
cant believe they took big bro off ya tim - biggest ever victory by a country mile for me was tourettes Pete falling down the steps on entry - wont eva be beaten
cant believe they took big bro off ya tim - biggest ever victory by a country mile for me was tourettes Pete falling down the steps on entry - wont eva be beaten
Can any of you remember what odds Freddie Flintoff dropped to after the 2005 Ashes win and then months later just before the show? Muzza apparently was as low as 1.05 on the night, but I'm sure would have been higher months prior to the show.
Stokes was 3.4ish just after the World Cup and dipped to evens at various hopeful times but was out to 2.9s until the last match turned around.
If Eng don't win The Ashes enough has happened to suggest he may not drift out anywhere near that far again, perhaps not even getting above evens. Only if Archer pulls off some amazing stunts is there any chance of a split cricket vote and that's if they allow two cricketers in the four male nominations, after allowing for the two obligatory women.
Can any of you remember what odds Freddie Flintoff dropped to after the 2005 Ashes win and then months later just before the show? Muzza apparently was as low as 1.05 on the night, but I'm sure would have been higher months prior to the show.Stokes w
To be fair, the DRS made it look a lot less doubtful than it might have actually been to the naked eye.
One of my favourite comments by a commie, I think it was Michael Holding who once said about a particularly easy LBW decision, in his relaxed Jamaican accent:-
"A man fixing a pipe couldn't be plumber than that".
To be fair, the DRS made it look a lot less doubtful than it might have actually been to the naked eye.One of my favourite comments by a commie, I think it was Michael Holding who once said about a particularly easy LBW decision, in his relaxed Jamai
most famous story was a certain fred trumen playing in sub continent 1st ball hit opener in front off middle and leg, umpire sed not out 2nd ball hit him bang in front of middle , not out sed umpire 3rd ball sent middle stump cartwheeling down ground,fred turned round and sed to umpire that must be close
most famous story was a certain fred trumen playing in sub continent 1st ball hit opener in front off middle and leg, umpire sed not out2nd ball hit him bang in front of middle , not out sed umpire3rd ball sent middle stump cartwheeling down ground,f
the guy that was batting with ben stokes will win it,jack was his name,he was the one under pressure,everyone who seen it felt that is Jack can hold on England can win,Ben is expected to score runs,but poor Jack had to look through a pair of sweaty spectacles as the rock hard cricket ball came hurtling towards him,the poor man could not even see.But Jack risked life and limb for his country and stuck to the job everyone in the nation wanted him to do.IT was Jack that was under far more pressure rather than Ben who is a recognised batsman. SO ITS JACK WHO SHOULD BE 1.01 IN MY BOOK.
the guy that was batting with ben stokes will win it,jack was his name,he was the one under pressure,everyone who seen it felt that is Jack can hold on England can win,Ben is expected to score runs,but poor Jack had to look through a pair of sweaty s
the guy that was batting with ben stokes will win it,jack was his name,he was the one under pressure,everyone who seen it felt that is Jack can hold on England can win,Ben is expected to score runs,but poor Jack had to look through a pair of sweaty spectacles as the rock hard cricket ball came hurtling towards him,the poor man could not even see.But Jack risked life and limb for his country and stuck to the job everyone in the nation wanted him to do.IT was Jack that was under far more pressure rather than Ben who is a recognised batsman. SO ITS JACK WHO SHOULD BE 1.01 IN MY BOOK.
the guy that was batting with ben stokes will win it,jack was his name,he was the one under pressure,everyone who seen it felt that is Jack can hold on England can win,Ben is expected to score runs,but poor Jack had to look through a pair of sweaty s
WHEN THEY MAKE THE FILM ABOUT IT jack will have a bad back,and a twisted knee and will be made look 30 years older than he really is,Ben will be a young high flying fit 21 year old who scores runs for fun,and faith will pair them together, but remember Ben had a choice with every ball, poor old JACK was shaking in his boots ,could not see,and if he is out he is blamed,However IF Ben is out he is still cheered. Now how does that Hollywood movie end?
WHEN THEY MAKE THE FILM ABOUT IT jack will have a bad back,and a twisted knee and will be made look 30 years older than he really is,Ben will be a young high flying fit 21 year old who scores runs for fun,and faith will pair them together,but remembe