Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Will the Luvvie parents be moving to be with him ?? Canada Next next stop ?
Show More
The parents have turned on the Government 
For not letting Jack Back 
Poor old confused Jack
For not letting Jack Back Poor old confused Jack
It was his choice to join a death cult letting him back would be a insult to all the people that have been killed by isis good riddance if he served his time here he would have to watched 24/7 it would cost a fortune I’m sure Canada will welcome him with open arms
Father saying the decision of the British Government to strip him of his citizenship is unfair.
Also complaining that they haven't told him why. Went on to say he didn't know what wrong his son had done.
Should go back to Canada if he's that unhappy.
Also complaining that they haven't told him why. Went on to say he didn't know what wrong his son had done.
Should go back to Canada if he's that unhappy.
They had probably made arrangements to move to Canada , thinking the Silly boy was on his way back here , they only sent him money to keep him in Syria , Look at the head on him 
Bet they have had Years of ADHD
The mother Looks a Wrong un and all Shift the lot of em to Canada
The Old Luvvie family u cannot make it up tbh .
Bet they have had Years of ADHD The mother Looks a Wrong un and all Shift the lot of em to Canada
The Old Luvvie family
u cannot make it up tbh .
The Canadians said he will be Prosecuted ,he won't be going there .
some dumb lefties against this here;
I know it's hard for old idiots like alun to understand but being critical of the process isn't defending him or Shamima Begum for example though.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jihadi-jack-stripped-of-british-citizenship-htsdbf92r
Andrew Mitchell, the former international development secretary, made his comments it was revealed that the Home Office had stepped in to revoke the citizenship of Jack Letts, 24, in one of the final acts of Theresa May’s administration.
Letts, a Muslim convert from Oxford, was exposed as the first white British male to join the jihadist group after he travelled to Syria as a teenager in 2014.
Mr Mitchell said it was not in the national interest for ministers to eschew responsibility for “dangerous, evil” jihadists who hail from Britain.
Mr Mitchell poured scorn on the government’s attitude towards citizenship revocation. He told The Times: “As a member of the United Nations security council, Britain sets a bad example to other countries if we do not take responsibility for such dangerous, evil people, as a result of rescinding their citizenship.
“It is not in our own interests or those of other innocent countries that such people should be left stateless and unaccountable. What if Canada follows this bad example?”
Tobias Ellwood, a former defence minister, also weighed in, warning that the move “shunts the responsibility elsewhere” when many fighters were “radicalised here in the UK”.
In a statement posted online, he said: “If [we] are to stay safe and prevent Isis 2.0 we must work with our allies and think more strategically than simply removing UK citizenship from radicalised dual nationals.”
I know it's hard for old idiots like alun to understand but being critical of the process isn't defending him or Shamima Begum for example though.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jihadi-jack-stripped-of-british-citizenship-htsdbf92r
Andrew Mitchell, the former international development secretary, made his comments it was revealed that the Home Office had stepped in to revoke the citizenship of Jack Letts, 24, in one of the final acts of Theresa May’s administration.
Letts, a Muslim convert from Oxford, was exposed as the first white British male to join the jihadist group after he travelled to Syria as a teenager in 2014.
Mr Mitchell said it was not in the national interest for ministers to eschew responsibility for “dangerous, evil” jihadists who hail from Britain.
Mr Mitchell poured scorn on the government’s attitude towards citizenship revocation. He told The Times: “As a member of the United Nations security council, Britain sets a bad example to other countries if we do not take responsibility for such dangerous, evil people, as a result of rescinding their citizenship.
“It is not in our own interests or those of other innocent countries that such people should be left stateless and unaccountable. What if Canada follows this bad example?”
Tobias Ellwood, a former defence minister, also weighed in, warning that the move “shunts the responsibility elsewhere” when many fighters were “radicalised here in the UK”.
In a statement posted online, he said: “If [we] are to stay safe and prevent Isis 2.0 we must work with our allies and think more strategically than simply removing UK citizenship from radicalised dual nationals.”
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539