Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Injera
05 Aug 19 16:35
Joined:
Date Joined: 04 Jan 03
| Topic/replies: 17,864 | Blogger: Injera's blog
'July this year was the warmest month ever recorded worldwide, satellite data has confirmed.

The assessment was carried out by researchers at the EU's Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S).

Scientists say it's the latest sign that Earth is experiencing unprecedented warming.'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-49238745

But wait! 'The July figures are likely to be the highest recorded in the organisation's 40-year dataset.' 40 years??!!!!LaughLaughLaugh

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-49165476

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 37
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 05 Aug 19 17:01
Fair enough. The warmest since records began. Happy now?
By:
aaronh
When: 05 Aug 19 17:47
thought this thread was at least gonna have some figures that went against the consensus but this is pretty pitiful, even for Injera
By:
treetop
When: 05 Aug 19 17:51
Intriguing suggestion that the database used has been adjusted in order to promote comments in the media such as hottest/coldest/wettest since records began ?
By:
SontaranStratagem
When: 05 Aug 19 17:52
We've had warmer July's I can assure you of that

Last July was warmer for a kick off, this year we got 3 days of high humidity and that was enough for them to spout their OTT c*ap

They can take pieces of that data to fit whatever agenda they are going with ffs

Its pitiful now
By:
SontaranStratagem
When: 05 Aug 19 17:55
Last summer we got a good 2 to 3 week period of good sunshine

2004 was the best summer I can remember, the whole 6 week holidays were blue sky sunshine, we spent all day everyday of that 6 week holiday on the park playing footy and sitting on the bank talking b0llucks Laugh

We've not had a stretch like that again since
By:
SontaranStratagem
When: 05 Aug 19 17:56
I can remember it well because we got asked by the teachers where we got our tans from Laugh
By:
treetop
When: 05 Aug 19 17:59
I recall 1976 as a summer of hot weather,pretty sure I haven't lived through one like that since but also sure some bright spark will select a doctored piece of data to tell me otherwise.
By:
macarony
When: 05 Aug 19 18:05
The Earth is 4 billion years old and there as many years far hotter than this year or any year in the near future.
The Earth orbits the sun the sun in turn travellers through the night sky in what is known as procession to  do full 365 degree orbit take just under 26000 years, the Earth alsof goes through periods of tilt and periods of distance change all of these things have an impact on the Earth.
However adding to these problems will only make things worse, I am all for greenactment energy not least because of the freedom and opportunities  it will ultimately bring for those  communities that sensible enough to use them, no more spending money to the Russians and the Middle East. Win Win
By:
Injera
When: 05 Aug 19 19:25
aaron - figures? I gave you THE figure. The EU Climate Change Service are saying July was the hottest on record and their records go back just the 40 years.

The spin is that it's the hottest July ever.

Lamentable.

I had a wonderful curry last week. It's the best curry I've had since June.. It was the best curry on record. Spin: it was the best curry ever.
By:
SontaranStratagem
When: 05 Aug 19 19:30
40 years is barely a generation ffs

How they can spin it as they are takes some serious front it has to be said

Its not even in the hottest July of the past 2 years though ffs
By:
Baphornet
When: 05 Aug 19 19:41
they've got to make a buck somehow!
By:
Mexico
When: 05 Aug 19 19:43
Just because this organisation has satellite data for "only" 40 years does not mean it does not have access to data recorded using different methods.

I would guess that when the 1st satellite started to send back data it was calibrated with traditional surface methods.

Injera's 2nd link contains a graph which suggests temp 100 years ago, 50 years ago was not even close to the recent temperatures recorded.
The 1940's seems to be warmer than 1930s or 1950s but nowhere near the temp of past decade.

The is data stretching back over 40 years, clearly disappointed that the lazy Victorians could not be bothered to put a few satellites into orbit.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 05 Aug 19 20:56
figures are for worldwide  - not the UK .

wake up at the back
By:
treetop
When: 06 Aug 19 21:23
Divert the question to an area that cant be contested by personal experience ?
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 06 Aug 19 21:34
Yeah, because the guy saying "I remember it was dead warm last summer" is just an important source of truth as the scientists looking at data over many years spanning the entire planet.
By:
dukeofpuke
When: 07 Aug 19 12:06
There are some studies on the earths magnetoshere and its effect on the weather very small changes in it ie a weaker field will mean more of the suns radiation reaching the earths atmosphere therefore warming the planet as more cloud cover is formed but that is conveniently ignored by the climate change activists
By:
Mexico
When: 07 Aug 19 19:47
Any link to some of these studies duke.
A couple of NASA pages (links below) suggest solar activity & Earth's temp are being studied- they seem to think the effect is small compared to atmospheric changes.
NASA disagree with your theory that more clouds means more of Sun's radiation reaching Earth - they say the opposite.

They are not sure if more clouds will result in higher temps (clouds act like blankets- keeping in warm air at night) or cooler temps (clouds reflect sunlight before it reaches Earth's surface)

Plenty of money is being spent on studying the Sun - the topic is hardly being ignored.


https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/rind_03/

https://isccp.giss.nasa.gov/role.html
By:
portmanpark
When: 07 Aug 19 19:55
injera...….are you a flat earther??.you seem crazy enough
By:
treetop
When: 07 Aug 19 20:46
As a former stats man I have always had scepticism about the interpretation of stats,too often a predefined hypothesis tends to get proven by an inherent bias. Remember the famous bathtub curve ? Many fell for that until it was proven false.
By:
Mexico
When: 07 Aug 19 21:09
Tree

There is a tad more to the global warming theory than a few stats which may have been misinterpreted because of a bias.

What do you mean by a former stats man - could pretty much anything from studying at GCSE to being a professor at a University maths department .
By:
DenzilPenberthy
When: 07 Aug 19 21:14
Or one better than a professor at University a successful horse racing stats man.
By:
treetop
When: 07 Aug 19 21:24
A lazy stats man mexico, member of FRSS until I was 31 before working overseas in a different capacity.
By:
dukeofpuke
When: 08 Aug 19 01:44
also one of the big things that is proven to have an affect on the earths climate is population density so if you draw a circle around china india which incorporates indonesia and malaysia etc there is over half the worlds population in a relative small area but also in a very hot area and you can see why the weather will change its a bit like focusing a magnifying glass
By:
Mexico
When: 08 Aug 19 05:34
Duke

Good idea to move on from your previous solar activity & cloud cover theory without further comment.


So in your latest post are you seem to be saying that human population is having a proven affect on temperature. Isn't that exactly what the scientists / politicians etc. Who claim that global warming is due to Humans are also claiming?

Are you agreeing with the scientific community or disagreeing?
By:
edy
When: 08 Aug 19 06:54
Everybody knows that any emissions from Britain could never ever have any influence on the climate anywhere else anyway. We are Britain, the land of The Lord, surrounded by a magic barrier.
By:
Injera
When: 08 Aug 19 16:59
Let the Anthropogenic Climate Change campaigners take up the thorny issues of mass migration, population increase/density and poverty.

I've yet to here the big cheeses tackle any of these. Do they want Africa to have an industrial revolution? What if they demanded meat in their daily diet? (They eat maize, the rich eat rice).

Do any of these lovers of the planet call for a pause in housebuilding or other infrastructure? No!

Do they call for a pause in migration from economies of subsistence farming to industrialised cities? No!

Are they frustrated that thousands of EU migrants fly back and forth to their homelands from our multiple airports? No!

Do they tirelessly campaign for the UK to tariff the hell out of imported goods so the carbon footprint of such is reduced? No! Do they slag Trump for this? Yes!

Until we see a consistency of deabata and action, scepticism is the best policy.
By:
Charlie
When: 08 Aug 19 18:06
Injera
From your previous posts you clearly don't believe in global warming mainly based on a lack of data. Please tell us why the points you posted above are a thorny issue? Who are the big cheeses? Why do you think there is a lack of consistency of debate? Why is scepticism the best action?
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 08 Aug 19 18:46
Inj is an idiot who's constantly on the brink of bursting into tears.

Might save you some time there Charlie in engaging too heavily with him.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 08 Aug 19 18:54
No need for such offensive comments PP.

You should be ashamed.
By:
Capt__F
When: 08 Aug 19 18:56
bit hot under the collar
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 09 Aug 19 09:51
Four things I know for sure:

The earth warms up and the earth cools down.

Data can be manipulated to prove anything you care to make it prove.

People with vested interests in projects are very prone to lying.

Certain people are making a lot of money out of promoting the idea that man is responsible for climate change.

The general public are easily convinced.
By:
terry mccann
When: 09 Aug 19 09:55
3 hot days the whole summer and the BBC are drowning us all with their climate change sh1te, who thick people must be to believe it on that evidence
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 09 Aug 19 09:58
Don't give me that 99% of scientists believe either.

Not when 99% of GPs will tell you that drug therapy is the only answer to many illnesses. Which I know is incorrect.

In a company employing 1,000 scientists, there's only one opinion that matters. That's the one who employs them. They follow their leader or look for another job.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 09 Aug 19 09:59
Four things I know for sure:

And possibly five - lol.
By:
aaronh
When: 09 Aug 19 11:52
People with vested interests in projects are very prone to lying.

Certain people are making a lot of money out of promoting the idea that man is responsible for climate change.


Crippen getting so close here Happy
By:
edy
When: 09 Aug 19 12:02
Everybody knows that lizard people don't care about money.
By:
Ibrahima Sonko
When: 09 Aug 19 16:11
.
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2019/07/30/new-record-temperature-but-how-much-of-it-is-due-to-uhi/
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com