Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 469 comments are related to the topic:
GLASTONBURY-FESTIVAL-GOERS ARE WALKING INTO A 5G EMF MINEFIELD
GLASTONBURY-FESTIVAL-GOERS ARE WALKING INTO A 5G EMF MINEFIELD
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 469
|
By:
^^^
Bloody hell can we not keep going about how it's "Stormzy"  We don't get thunder and lightning storms here like we do on the continent though? That sort of "it's fine" then within minutes it's dark and all hell breaks loose with torrential rain and Thor smighting the area, then a shortly later back to normal again. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
"On 5G at Glastonbury here is a useful blog recording the discussion and the news that someone has been measuring the radiation but their video has been REMOVED by Facebook. One copy still being circulated. https//www.5gexposed.com/glastonbury-guinea-pig-5gspecial/ see final entry on this page".
|
|
By:
so how many will die, will they die soon or long term cancer. out of about 250k around a third will have some
sort of cancer experience if they live past 45. you need to back this up terry, who is dying & when? Very unlikely commercial enterprises would target 1st world countries who have spending power & buy things off them . It just makes zero sense. |
|
By:
cue, "that's what they want you to think"
 |
|
By:
3V or 3000mv (easier to quantify mv) especially at that distance is way above the EU Directive on occupational exposure however the government set no limits for public exposure.
The Laws and limits are also outdated given the changes in technology in recent years. http://www.emfs.info/limits/limits-organisations/regulations-2016/ |
|
By:
Lovely place to start would be "U.N AGENDA 21 CULLING OF THE POPULATION" Just think 5G and why they are rolling it out untested then read the U.N"S and see if the penny drops then.
|
|
By:
North,you really have a closed mind don't you, actually don't bother and don't bother me again,ta.
|
|
By:
that's a bit harsh, i may have a closed mind but i read your posts whether i agree or not.
semi open mind? |
|
By:
Sorry North wasn't might for you that last post,makes a good read but very depressing
|
|
By:
the fact you named me was a tad confusing
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
I get your point but I had just read your post and in the words of Crispin St.Peters "you were on my mind" |
|
By:
This guy has devoted his whole life to conspiracies.
There doesn't seem to be a single conspiracy web page that Terry hasn't memorised. And that's on top of the tens of hours a week he spends on here. |
|
By:
he is entitled to. all i ask him to do is consider the logic of his claims
|
|
By:
Good God Almighty
So none of you have read about the kids starting to wake up to whats happening at Glastonbury? How the f uck do I get to be called a nut still? Hey guys f uck u 2. |
|
By:
dave1357 it's extremely relevant to any 5G debate as the acceptable levels from 2016 are for lower frequency technologies and are still potentially dangerous and 5G will be operating on higher frequencies with far more potential for cellular damage.
That's why I wrote: The Laws and limits are also outdated given the changes in technology in recent years. |
|
By:
It was for 2 and 3 G Den I believe,years out of date, how can anyone kid people alond still that its safe for Chist Sakes
 |
|
By:
he is entitled to. all i ask him to do is consider the logic of his claims
Northanlite----Haven't you been trying to do that for months? And many have tried before you. Conspiracies is his obsession. Conspiracies and logic don't mix. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
dave1357 you sound like an expert please explain.
|
|
By:
Here's another outdated study with links to more outdated studies which showed risk even at the lower end.
There are plenty studies that show potential risks we could go round in circles but EMF radiation exposure isn't RISK FREE it is folly to maintain it is when the issue hasn't been properly investigated publicly. This 5G lark is on bandwidths which have been previously owned and used by Military and haven't been properly tested which is a fact nobody can deny. If they were more open and did proper testing there'd be less people asking questions why,hopefully these technologies ARE LOW RISK LONG TERM but as of now nobody can confirm for certain due to lack of testing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716201 |
|
By:
That is another debate - specifically I was calling you out about using a completely irrelevant source.
|
|
By:
I'm showing you evidence of risk from less powerful technology whilst pointing out the technology hasn't been tested,as said we could go round in circles.
|
|
By:
*new technology hasn't been tested*
Just letting you know dave I'm off out so not in for a pointless back and forth if that's what you're after. |
|
By:
no - what you did was ignorantly pick a source that discussed electromagnetic radiation from power sources. It was as relevant as picking a source that discussed the safety dangers to staff working outside in the sun, being exposed to solar radiation.
Your second source is at least relevant but when it uses phrases like "Recently, a number of reports revealed" and "reportedly resulted in a dramatic increase of cancer incidence among population living nearby" and is from an obscure source in the Ukraine, I will choose not to give it a lot of credit. |
|
By:
It isn't irrelevant as EMF from 5G cell towers will be increased due to the number of towers needed for the tech to work which means the levels of EMF will be higher than what they currently are and have been.
Therefore if there are potential issues at the lower levels there will be potential issues when EMF is increased that's why the technology should've been tested before any rollout commenced. dave there are plenty that I've posted on here that are all from scientific peer reviewed articles mostly relating to cell towers WIFI EMF sensitivity and the likes which are all credible or else I wouldn't post them. I had quite a few saved but when they were posted got lost in the arguments or ignored,the language used by whoever wrote the paper shouldn't influence any interpretation of the results,discussion and conclusion. If it was all complete bolox I'd have not bothered along time ago any potential health risks should've been properly investigated which hasn't happened despite the immense cost and global impact (posted the video from the US senate which was acknowledged not to be BS even by the trolls). A couple more irrelevant EMF studies from memory below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26602000 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-16623-8 Off out now |
|
By:
Sorry I was away from the computer most of the day. How is the festival going? Is everyone ok?
|
|
By:
Stormzy got a bit emotional tears one minute and f*** Boris the next but that might be more about being brown and important than EMF radiation.
|
|
By:
and f*** Boris
a message i can get behind. fat old etonian tw@t is another |
|
By:
5G STRIKES!!
https://metro.co.uk/2019/07/01/glastonbury-2019-security-guard-found-dead-tent-last-night-festival-10096967/ |
|
By:
Age 60+
falls dead for no reason officials don't know what caused the death but know its not suspicious. The media trying to downplay the death by comparing it to petty offences reported during the festival. Sounds like a coverup to me. Looks like the Glastonbury festival was a successful 5G test. |
|
By:
5G death toll: 1
Remaining: six billion nine hundred ninety-nine million nine hundred ninety-nine thousand nine hundred ninety-nine |
|
By:
Stormzy will be along shortly to explain the dangers of 5G radiation
|
|
By:
Amazon are reporting a run on union jack 5G proof vests.
|
|
By:
… everywhere but Scotland.
 The SNP mugs would rather get stabbed. |
|
By:
Was Ronnie Baxter (darts) the first person to wear that particular shade of Union Jack colour?
|
|
By:
A UJ stab proof vest will not protect you from a brick
|
|
By:
Fascinating interview yesterday twitter.com/RichieAllenshow with Barrie Trower(the trolls hate him and is there any wonder)?.All documented,verified information and evidence on microwave hazards from a thoroughly qualified and experienced expert.
Barry Trower calmly tells us the horrific damage 5G will do to your bodies and minds,how it will spy Working in tantum with Smart Meters on every single one of us,and that includes criminals and pedos spying on us and our children. But far from being doom and gloom,he firmly believes now that 5G will be stopped as there are 187 countries fighting the Industry and only the most corrupt UK,N.Z,AUSTRALIAD,USA,and CANADA determined to roll it out,but he thinks now lawsuits can stop it,and if they do still roll it out,it will have to be with FIBRE OPTIC CABLE which according to Trower is safe. So people arond the world are truly taking notice despite not one single word by the main stream media about it despite the dangers to every living thing being known for many years. He also believes that local county counsils can be taken to court,which of course would be a huge step. Have a listen,well worth it. |
|
By:
I'm not entirely sure if FIBRE OBTIC CABLE wires are a suitable technology to transmit data between base points and wireless mobile devices.
|