Yaxley-Lemon punished by youtube

All they had to do was overdub him with a more manly voice.

It's a bit too late to start silencing the dissenting voices . They should have done this a couple of years ago if they wanted to have the desired effect .

He'd still be getting away with it if he was bearded with a hooky hand.

mouse muldoon • April 2, 2019 8:46 PM BST
He'd still be getting away with it if he was bearded with a hooky hand.

Not sure what he was getting away with in the first place

preaching on da tube bruv

Right wing extremism, Reynard

Cheers Richie , I missed those ones

We're not interested in RWE on 'ere, Richie, hence no Jack Renshaw thread.

No place for any extremism , on here or anywhere Mr Muldoon

I'm sure the forum's substantial "national action" contingent will be on after they've finished posting on stormfront or 8chan.

Plenty of leftee extremists on here, although three are suspected of being the same agent.

Is 'nationalist action' a type of Brexiteer ?

I believe they were promoting "civil disobedience".

The outcome of which may have proved fatal for a member of the lower house.

Anyway, as I say, we don't do RWE on here, we're more of a reaffirmation group for the casuals.

Can't understand why people are so angry

They're angry because they'll have to watch that little vest twerp now instead of Thomas.

*yellow vest twerp

I think this might just be a move to show the EU that Google is serious in tackling right wing extremism(or whatever you want to call it). From what I know Tommy was being censored by the media of his own country so Google just picked a soft target that won't be noticed but would increase their reputation(and give them something to show to authorities when social media regulation talks soon start in America)

detraveller - Apparently Mr Robinson was a neo-nazi
I know that because Richie said so .

Well there was certainly an overabundance of white faces at his recent rally.

https://youtu.be/3KSuFN8-tWw

There's something very suspicious about any movement that can't attract a few token sikhs.

Whatever you call it, Reycist, it's a blight on society which needs to be peripheralised - therefore I welcome the crackdown. If anything, it doesn't go far enough.

Banning classical liberals yet they allow depictions of the prophet!

What kind of backward thinking is that?

My 18th was your joined date, lux

I feel sorry for you if you think Robinson is a liberal.

I never said he was a liberal . Your use of the word Reycist . Do I take it as implying that I am a racist ?

hot

"kebab removalists"

Even I find that offensive.

whose side you on?

Whatever you're both whinging about is exactly what you are.

Why do people choose to label others , however subliminal or poorly disguised , and then be so gutless as to defend their slanderous jibes by referencing any evidence or factual examples ?

Richie_Burnett • April 2, 2019 10:00 PM BST
Whatever you're both whinging about is exactly what you are.
What a childish response . The sort of throwaway line I remember from the school playground

When you put it like that Was just trying to reply to both at the same time.

What I mean is that most labels apply to Robinson apologists/sympathisers - so I don't think the "who me?" argument holds much water. Whatever helps you sleep at night, I guess.

I'm neither an apologist nor a sympathiser . The problem is with your sort is that it is easier to 'generalise' and make uninformed accusations simply to shut down debate .
I never made any comment regarding race or religion , nor did I make any reference to your past activities (not because I condone such acts but I believe people deserve a second chance) .

It's a shame that you're a bigot, reynard, but you're entitled to your opinion (to an extent). It's a bigger shame that even on an anonymous forum you won't nail your colours to the mast.

Definition of 'bigot' required .

you're entitled to your opinion (to an extent). Don't remember Voltaire adding that bit

even on an anonymous forum you won't nail your colours to the mast. It's only anonymous if nobody is aware of one's true identity . Where I'm concerned that's not the case . Several know exactly who I am .
However I'm more than happy to 'nail my colours to the mast' on subjects where I'm fully informed and confident in my opinion . Unfortunately that's not the situation on the subject of Mr Robinson . I clearly know less than yourself .

Not sure what he was getting away with in the first place

Your words not mine. A tacit acknowledgement that you're an apologist. I posit that you know a lot more about him than you're letting on.

I think the anonymity is a somewhat moot point but if you're known then fair enough. Voltaire gag very droll.

bigot

noun
a person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions.

I haven't seen any footage of his neo-nazi activities but the few snippets that I have seen don't suggest that he was getting away with anything , although I'm only to willing to look at your evidence to the contrary .
As for being intolerant to those holding different opinions I'm quite prepared to listen and debate with anyone , regardless of their views , and if their argument is both sound and rational I'm not averse to changing mine .

Is the merch still selling well?

The use of Your Sort and Generalise in the same sentence is a true chit chat debating high point imo.

PP - That comment was aimed at Richie Burnett . Unfortunately Richie is unable to be with us today due to register signing duties . I'm sure he will return provided he hasn't breached his restriction .

straight over reynards head

Quite don.

Standard of comprehension on here obviously isn't what it was.