



|
By:
All they had to do was overdub him with a more manly voice.
|
|
By:
It's a bit too late to start silencing the dissenting voices . They should have done this a couple of years ago if they wanted to have the desired effect .
|
|
By:
He'd still be getting away with it if he was bearded with a hooky hand.
|
|
By:
mouse muldoon • April 2, 2019 8:46 PM BST
He'd still be getting away with it if he was bearded with a hooky hand. Not sure what he was getting away with in the first place ![]() |
|
By:
preaching on da tube bruv
|
|
By:
Right wing extremism, Reynard
![]() |
|
By:
Cheers Richie , I missed those ones
![]() |
|
By:
We're not interested in RWE on 'ere, Richie, hence no Jack Renshaw thread.
|
|
By:
No place for any extremism , on here or anywhere Mr Muldoon
![]() |
|
By:
I'm sure the forum's substantial "national action" contingent will be on after they've finished posting on stormfront or 8chan.
|
|
By:
Plenty of leftee extremists on here, although three are suspected of being the same agent.
|
|
By:
Is 'nationalist action' a type of Brexiteer ?
|
|
By:
I believe they were promoting "civil disobedience".
|
|
By:
The outcome of which may have proved fatal for a member of the lower house.
|
|
By:
Anyway, as I say, we don't do RWE on here, we're more of a reaffirmation group for the casuals.
|
|
By:
Can't understand why people are so angry
![]() |
|
By:
They're angry because they'll have to watch that little vest twerp now instead of Thomas.
|
|
By:
*yellow vest twerp
|
|
By:
I think this might just be a move to show the EU that Google is serious in tackling right wing extremism(or whatever you want to call it). From what I know Tommy was being censored by the media of his own country so Google just picked a soft target that won't be noticed but would increase their reputation(and give them something to show to authorities when social media regulation talks soon start in America)
|
|
By:
detraveller - Apparently Mr Robinson was a neo-nazi
![]() I know that because Richie said so . |
|
By:
Well there was certainly an overabundance of white faces at his recent rally.
|
|
By:
https://youtu.be/3KSuFN8-tWw
|
|
By:
There's something very suspicious about any movement that can't attract a few token sikhs.
|
|
By:
Whatever you call it, Reycist, it's a blight on society which needs to be peripheralised - therefore I welcome the crackdown. If anything, it doesn't go far enough.
|
|
By:
Banning classical liberals yet they allow depictions of the prophet!
What kind of backward thinking is that? |
|
By:
My 18th was your joined date, lux
![]() |
|
By:
I feel sorry for you if you think Robinson is a liberal.
|
|
By:
I never said he was a liberal . Your use of the word Reycist . Do I take it as implying that I am a racist ?
![]() |
|
By:
hot
|
|
By:
"kebab removalists"
Even I find that offensive. |
|
By:
whose side you on?
|
|
By:
Whatever you're both whinging about is exactly what you are.
|
|
By:
Why do people choose to label others , however subliminal or poorly disguised , and then be so gutless as to defend their slanderous jibes by referencing any evidence or factual examples ?
![]() |
|
By:
Richie_Burnett • April 2, 2019 10:00 PM BST
Whatever you're both whinging about is exactly what you are. What a childish response . The sort of throwaway line I remember from the school playground ![]() |
|
By:
When you put it like that
Was just trying to reply to both at the same time.What I mean is that most labels apply to Robinson apologists/sympathisers - so I don't think the "who me?" argument holds much water. Whatever helps you sleep at night, I guess. |
|
By:
I'm neither an apologist nor a sympathiser . The problem is with your sort is that it is easier to 'generalise' and make uninformed accusations simply to shut down debate .
I never made any comment regarding race or religion , nor did I make any reference to your past activities (not because I condone such acts but I believe people deserve a second chance) . |
|
By:
It's a shame that you're a bigot, reynard, but you're entitled to your opinion (to an extent). It's a bigger shame that even on an anonymous forum you won't nail your colours to the mast.
|
|
By:
Definition of 'bigot' required .
you're entitled to your opinion (to an extent). Don't remember Voltaire adding that bit ![]() even on an anonymous forum you won't nail your colours to the mast. It's only anonymous if nobody is aware of one's true identity . Where I'm concerned that's not the case . Several know exactly who I am . However I'm more than happy to 'nail my colours to the mast' on subjects where I'm fully informed and confident in my opinion . Unfortunately that's not the situation on the subject of Mr Robinson . I clearly know less than yourself . |
|
By:
Not sure what he was getting away with in the first place
Your words not mine. A tacit acknowledgement that you're an apologist. I posit that you know a lot more about him than you're letting on. I think the anonymity is a somewhat moot point but if you're known then fair enough. Voltaire gag very droll. bigot noun a person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions. |