Chit Chat
I had some hopes of this when I heard the parents were boycotting it, but it seems there is going to be in depth analysis of 'child kidnapping to order gangs' and similar Easter Bunny level abduction scenarios
|
By:
It seems a bit pointless at best. I expect that if the Netflix team had found Maddie, or even any credible evidence linking anyone at all to her disappearance, they'd have announced it already. Instead it will be a Wikipedia page in video form.
|
|
By:
And they always tell the truth!
|
|
By:
As is well known, on her lawyer's advice, Kate refused to answer 48 questions.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6816327/The-48-questions-Kate-McCann-didnt-answer-disappearance-daughter-Madeleine.html |
|
By:
The only parties not to lie in this whole sordid story were the dogs .. They knew.
|
|
By:
Although I feel sure some will try to defend that evidence which seems to have been completely ignored
|
|
By:
I would usually be very interested in a series/documentary on Maddy. but this series sounds pointless and pro-McCanns.
James Bogart shares his views on the Netflix series, and confirmed that I will not be watching: https://youtu.be/3Vfkloq7vgI Besides he has already solved the case and I just wish someone had the balls to televise it! I noticed the Sun is still stating that the McCanns have been cleared of being involved. How are they allowed to do this when the Portuguese Supreme court confirmed that they HAVE NOT been cleared. |
|
By:
GUILTY AS SIN, TERRIBLE DOCUMENTARY
|
|
By:
What is the strange obsession with this case when so many others go by un noticed?
|
|
By:
THE OBV GUILT
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Fair enough when you put it like that you have just highlighted the some of the issues with our sicj society
|
|
By:
Tin foil truthers gravitate to conspiracy like flies to sh1t, how unexpected.
|
|
By:
In any case or controversy I just like to follow the evidence.
Here we have zero evidence of any abduction, and a very long list of unusual words and actions from the people claiming it was an abduction. And an £11M and counting police investigation that is only allowed to 'look for the abductor', that was ordered by the government and The Sun. |
|
By:
Hardly surprising when MI5 were on the scene within 48 hours, Clarence Mitchell is their press officer and Gordon Brown's on the blower that week!!
|
|
By:
Not sure why the McCanns didn't want anything to do with this I suspect they fell out with Netflix over money.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
What the parents did to that poor girl was a disgrace.... dressing her in an Everton shirt.
|
|
By:
I expect they are unhappy with this because they have grown accustomed to entirely biased coverage, where 100% of the discussion is 'who was the abductor'. The Crimewatch 2013 is the gold standard for the Mccanns.
As this thing is 8hrs long i expect 45 minutes or so is given over to the evidence against them, though likely with talking heads explaining it was all a big mistake by 'Bungling Portuguese Cops'. |
|
By:
Kate and Gerry didn't look for their daughter on the night of her disappearance. They stayed in the hotel complex.
Kate's first words to the 'Tapas 7' were 'they've taken her!' 99% of parents with missing kids would surely say 'she's gone' or 'I can't find her'. |
|
By:
So why are the parents being protected by Government/police? Btw the Irish family on holiday who said that they say Mr. McCann holding a lifeless child of about 3yrs old 9.30 that fateful evening didn't retract their statement as the BBC said,they still stand by that.
|
|
By:
Yes Terry, the BBC made it up...and episode 13 or 14 of Bogart explores the reasons for protection.
It's just pathetic that this is still going on. Injera...not just that (there is so much BS that has been exposed), but Kate also claimed the window was open (convenient narrative) yet in their statements none of the Tapas 7 mentioned the window was open. Perhaps Kate was cold, and decided to close it? None of the Tapas 7 knew of Gerry's whereabouts in the aftermath (according to their statements), he was neither outside searching with the men, nor was he inside the flat. He just mysteriously vanished. At the same time there was the Smith sighting. |
|
By:
Having watched YouTube clips of Gerry Mccan over the years, the guild is 100% there, laughing and smiling in one clip. Saville got away with it for 40 years plus and in the public eye, I guess its easy with the right connections.
|
|
By:
Ive been asleep for 5 yrs,i thought this was a case of very bad parenting.
What are you guys suggesting, precisely. |
|
By:
The only saving grace is that Kate McCann wears the mask of a woman who is carrying the guilt with her til her dying day .
|
|
By:
their stories dont add up
their odd behaviour doesnt add up they hardly co operated with the police immediately after just hope 1 day the truth comes out |
|
By:
How can the truth come out now what's got to happen?
|
|
By:
no idea
maybe 1 of the tapas crew knows more than they are letting on, find the body (it will be by accident if they do. Maybe Kate breaks down and tells the truth. i doubt the police on either side of the water will uncover anything. |
|
By:
got pelters at the time for saying it, and don't no whether is was a police/bbc ruise,or why Gerry if he had any say because he was actually in the studio, let it be aired
but on that crimeweatch the reconstruction of the smith sighting,the actor playing the part of carrying the child towards the beech was a 90% plus ringer for Gerry, I nearly fell out of my chair when I saw it |
|
By:
lfc will be along shortly to post 20 times that Gerry must be innocent because a guilty man couldn't say what Gerry said,
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Tin foil truthers gravitate to conspiracy like flies to sh1t, how unexpected.
Very true. I don't see how anyone can come to any concrete conclusion other than ongoing investigations are a complete waste of money and that the McCanns are very bad parents without getting their knowledge from comments on youtube videos by nutters. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Scotland Yard have just been given their umpeenth request for more money to carry on the investigation in Portugal.
|
|
By:
The continued ongoing investigations by Scotland Yard several years after is clearly what I am referring to.
I will add a link for you since you don't seem particularly clued up. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/madeleine-mccann-cops-ask-home-office-for-more-money-to-continue-search-for-missing-child-a4080746.html. Maybe you could elaborate how my comments are stupid and ignorant. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
another madeleine mccann thread
 why do some people insist on calling her MADDY, why would you shorten the name as if you know her, it's a bit odd. tober every thread on this story you always say the same thing about there being no evidence of an abduction - but never mention the fact that every tom, d ick and harry trampled all over that property when they first arrived instead of sealing it off properly and carrying out the correct forensics procedures, given the fact it was a rented apartment it would be easy as anything for any previous tenant to gain access with a cut key, also strange how you give off the impression that no abduction evidence is a world first, many people have been abducted with evidence. also, the guy in that youtube video posted above james bogart, you have to laugh, the way he seems so angry and upset about the Portuguese Reporter women having the temerity to change her mind on the McCanns, he then proeceeds to discredit her saying she was never a serious journalist and she is a JUDAS "I had a notion about her some time ago, I suspected her" - course you did sunshine, of course you did, just because she no longer helps you and your narrative anymore, and what was that lame bullshit about a scot defending a scot just because he was a scot, that clip is just as wishy washy as the documentary, another one on the distastful gravy train, how much has he made from his youtube videos I wonder, it's typical of most people, they believe what they want to believe, get their news and info from where they want to get it from. |
|
By:
I disagree with you Scandinavian Have you watched Bogart's series? First of all it's not monetised, secondly if you watch his series he will take you step by step through the evidence and contradictions, so it doesn't go over your head.
Tober is correct in what he says, and I invite you to provide evidence to the contrary? The police may have been about late to corner off the scene, however this wouldn't have severely impacted the investigation, and the Police correctly chose to focus on the McCans until the British Elite joined in. As for the journalist, he was rightly making a comment about her, but her opinion in no way affects the investigation or anything else..so that's pointless to comment on. |
|
By:
If you think this is a legitimate investigation, which has taken years, cost millions and the only ”new" piece of information they have uncovered is that 'Tannerman’ was in fact Dr Totman (the Portuguese Police had already ruled him out from the start) then you are clearly wrong.
Scotland Yard pre-eliminated any investigation into the prime and only suspects they have , ignoring all of those facts an evidence. There are contradicting statements made by the Tapas 7 which has been ignored. So in all these years, all this money spent, there is no evidence of a break in, no new leads whatsoever! None!, No suspects, and you want to believe this is a legitimate investigation You are stupid and ignorant because you see what the Sun tells you and believe it. They do not carry out these kinds of excersies for just any missing child, so why carry it on, when after so much time and money they have discovered nothing. This. "investigation" is simply to carry on the charade until it no longer in the public's mind...so I wouldn't expect this funding to be ended soon. Perhaps you should do a little research before sharing your views. You can access the police files online, and read the evidence and you can watch Bogart (who is anything but a nutcase) I'm not even sure what you are saying Allinr1. As I understand it I have said the investigation was a complete waste of money. You have said to me their is no Investigation in to Madeliene Mccann that is ongoing. I have responded with saying the investigation by Scotland Yard is the one I was referring to. You have then said if I think this is a legitemate inevestition then I must be a sun reader etc. abuse, abuse. I already told you this investigation was a waste of money in my initial post. I'm not sure what point you are trying to get across to me by saying things like: So in all these years, all this money spent, there is no evidence of a break in, no new leads whatsoever! None!, No suspects, and you want to believe this is a legitimate investigation |
|
By:
Problem without society is the likes of Scandinavian, shrewed dude and LCFC will read the sun and just take its stories to face value.
|