Jan 15, 2019 -- 4:25PM, UBLE/REGY wrote:
yes...probably of starvation wolf3011
prob
Jan 15, 2019 -- 4:54PM, i_agree_with_nick wrote:
There are people on the forums who consistently make a profit from their betting. You know who you are!
no there arent
Jan 15, 2019 -- 4:30PM, themightymac wrote:
When one is twenty one thinks that they can be a professional gambler.By thirty one realises how extremely difficult it is.By forty one realises that gambling has taken over one`s life and that it can`t be done.By fifty one wishes one had never started gambling in the first instance.
It can be done from a young age it's only the freedom to place bets that slows you down and being forced to live a conventional life from childhood that makes you start later than you should've done.
Jan 15, 2019 -- 9:11PM, DenzilPenberthy wrote:
Jan 15, 2019 -- 4:30PM, themightymac wrote:When one is twenty one thinks that they can be a professional gambler.By thirty one realises how extremely difficult it is.By forty one realises that gambling has taken over one`s life and that it can`t be done.By fifty one wishes one had never started gambling in the first instance.It can be done from a young age it's only the freedom to place bets that slows you down and being forced to live a conventional life from childhood that makes you start later than you should've done.
lol rubbish , you must be just starting out
Jan 15, 2019 -- 9:14PM, mouse muldoon wrote:
Age 28, opened betfair accountAge 29, jacked in day jobOf course there were a lot more low-hanging fruits in them days, don't suppose there's many that make the leap now.
You're saying you make money betting or trading enough to clear a minimum wage job.. funny how so many are in the 0.5% that do
Jan 15, 2019 -- 9:29PM, wolf3011 wrote:
Are you doing it now as a fulltime job?
Do you think it can't be done wolf?
Jan 15, 2019 -- 9:30PM, DenzilPenberthy wrote:
Jan 15, 2019 -- 9:29PM, wolf3011 wrote:Are you doing it now as a fulltime job?Do you think it can't be done wolf?
without bots no I dont
Jan 15, 2019 -- 9:32PM, wolf3011 wrote:
Jan 15, 2019 -- 9:30PM, DenzilPenberthy wrote:Jan 15, 2019 -- 9:29PM, wolf3011 wrote:Are you doing it now as a fulltime job?Do you think it can't be done wolf?without bots no I dont
Don't know about trading have never done it but straightforward betting can be done,if bookmakers took bets it could be done by many.
Jan 15, 2019 -- 9:38PM, wolf3011 wrote:
Are you clearing a years minimum wage plus annually in profit denzil on a consistent basis
Don't know what the minimum wage is and don't like to talk about money given different perceptions,will only say I've got a comfortable life and work when I want to.
Jan 15, 2019 -- 10:41PM, ufcdan wrote:
Ladcrooks used to call me John222. Hills called me "Fat bloke" really banged their heads together to come up with that one
Jan 15, 2019 -- 10:28PM, Richie_Burnett wrote:
wolf3011, maybe some people are shrewder than you.e.g. ME Keep depositing you lemonKOD >>> the betting and forum legend
or maybe you're a lying bellend just bragging on an internet forum
Jan 15, 2019 -- 10:37PM, Richie_Burnett wrote:
BTW, if you think the markets are on point then you're sadly mistaken.http://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/23434118/... can clearly see, over a period of years, that the markets have not adjusted to the global dearth of test match quality batting - hence the draw lay profitability. This is pre-toss, mark my words: it gets better as the the game goes on. This is mens, womens is even better
The fact you are using a tiny same ( which less than 500 is) to demonstrate laying odds approaching 10 shows anything illustrates you must be one of the thickest posters to have ever graced the forum
Jan 15, 2019 -- 11:11PM, Richie_Burnett wrote:
Look man, you don't need a huge sample to exploit the market. You're so bitterIf I gave you 20/1 on Liverpool to win the league you'd be like........small sample
"look man " you do..you're using 460 bets to show that backing the underdog in cricket at long odds proves the markets are out and laying the draw at long odds proves the market is out. It's embarrassing and utterly ridiculous. You could take any one season in the premier league and look at a specific market over that number of bets and see either a significant profit or loss. It means fck all. Laying the draw at 10 would mean in 400 matches , 40 would average a draw but in any given sample just a few out would mean significant gains or losses. The next 400 matches, you are likely to be the same amount down as you were in profit.
Jan 17, 2019 -- 12:01AM, Richie_Burnett wrote:
wolf3011, you lemon, I wish you would stop embarrassing yourself. It's quite unnecessary.I was pointing out that the markets are not as efficient as you claimed, not saying I point and click on test match draw lays.
You clearly haven't read anything I've written and too thick to continue on speaking to Richie... you keep on laying the draw with your edge lol