This is what any presenter with an agenda will do.
The object for the presenter is to get their points across in the form of punchy one line questions or accusations, then prevent the interviewee from giving an answer. The whole idea is to make the interviewee look bad.
But when the presenter interviews a person they agree with, the accusations are missing and te questions are far less frequent.
Watch Andrew Marr interviewing someone from the left, it has more in common with a fireside chat than an interview. Then smiles all round at the conclusion.
In contrast his interviewing of any from the right is always hostile, and he always saves his most damning question or personal slur for right at the end of the interview. Which is designed to leave a negative lingering thought in the mind of the viewer.
This is what any presenter with an agenda will do.The object for the presenter is to get their points across in the form of punchy one line questions or accusations, then prevent the interviewee from giving an answer. The whole idea is to make the in
Most blatant bias I heard on Sky, was from some female presenter summing up a report on UKIP's rising popularity some years ago.
When she said - ''a disturbing report there about UKIP.''
I kid you not.
Most blatant bias I heard on Sky, was from some female presenter summing up a report on UKIP's rising popularity some years ago.When she said - ''a disturbing report there about UKIP.''I kid you not.
He neatly turned the tables on Boulton by accusing him of something instead.
Then kept Boulton on the back foot as he tried to defend himself.
Brilliant stuff from Campbell.
I remember that with Alastair Campbell. He neatly turned the tables on Boulton by accusing him of something instead.Then kept Boulton on the back foot as he tried to defend himself.Brilliant stuff from Campbell.