It started way back with Labour's Race Relations Act. That was the thin edge of the wedge. They got away with it and a lot more since until now they think the public are so soft they can get away with forcing anything on us.
It started way back with Labour's Race Relations Act. That was the thin edge of the wedge. They got away with it and a lot more since until now they think the public are so soft they can get away with forcing anything on us.
It's the Globalist plan to remove all national identity. Create chaotic soup cultures where the established identity is swamped by others, diluted and effectively ceases to exist.
In that scenario the elite can have even greater power as the people become divided and 'cosmopolotan' (although I thought that was an ice cream...)
Of course it opens the door for a new, dominant identity to hold sway.. I think we all know who they are.
It's the Globalist plan to remove all national identity. Create chaotic soup cultures where the established identity is swamped by others, diluted and effectively ceases to exist.In that scenario the elite can have even greater power as the people be
I stupidly watched that smug leftist t)sser on the "the mash report" last night (yes - why DO I torture myself?). And he was getting laid into Clinton for her acknowledging the simple fact that people were rightly pissed off about immigration and that politicians should listen to their valid concerns. He (in amongst his predictable mud slinging that Trump was "far right") of course was totally against this, and instead said listening to concerns about immigration was "appeasing" the far right.
Basically, and this is the usual theme from *holes like him, who is of course not remotely funny and employed as a diversity box tick by the BBC (who themselves are little more than mass migration propaganda network): if you are in any way against mass immigration you are a nazi, and listenng to valid concerns or acting on them is appeasing nazis and will lead to more people becoming far right.
I'm sure he'd LOVE the UNs idea and that anyone he or any other SJW disagrees with should be charged with a "hate crime". Our university campuses are now becoming free speech free areas, lets roll it out to the entire population.
The reality is of course that the rise of the far right is precisely because blinkered fools on the left have created a situation where any talk about immigration is silenced with hysterical accusations of "fascist" so people are turning to the only people who have ears open to their justified concerns. That much is obvious, but way above the intellect of the sort of leftie luvvies the BBC take on.
I stupidly watched that smug leftist t)sser on the "the mash report" last night (yes - why DO I torture myself?). And he was getting laid into Clinton for her acknowledging the simple fact that people were rightly pissed off about immigration and tha
Be interesting to see the lists of candidates for the next general election. If we're not free of the EU by then, Neither Labour, Liberals or the Conservatives will get my vote.
Be interesting to see the lists of candidates for the next general election.If we're not free of the EU by then, Neither Labour, Liberals or the Conservatives will get my vote.
I stupidly watched that smug leftist t)sser on the "the mash report" last night (yes - why DO I torture myself?).
I`ll say one thing JC you are a glutton for punishment.
I had never heard of it and only switched it on because you kept moaning about it. Curiosity killed the cat and all that. I can honestly say you were being kind with your criticism. I lasted five minutes and I was quickly losing the will to live. I can honestly say that I have never seen as much tosh in all my life.
I stupidly watched that smug leftist t)sser on the "the mash report" last night (yes - why DO I torture myself?). I`ll say one thing JC you are a glutton for punishment. I had never heard of it and only switched it on because you kept moaning about i
There you go, the EU, great example. UKIP are accused of being "far right" - but people were p1ssed off at the EU. The Tories allowed a referendum, so the people were satisfied. People didn't then turn to a further right party or even stay with UKIP, on the contrary, the UKIP vote totally collapsed. That ties in with what I'm saying above and is precisely the opposite of the clueless leftie argument that you shouldn't listen to people and instead insult them ... NOT listening to people and insulting their views, in addition to being extremely arrogant and condescending, drives people to find other parties who WILL listen to them...
There you go, the EU, great example. UKIP are accused of being "far right" - but people were p1ssed off at the EU. The Tories allowed a referendum, so the people were satisfied. People didn't then turn to a further right party or even stay with UKIP,
another labour form ticking black female mp resigns because she cant tell the truth about her son taking/selling drugs whilst employed by her, on taxpayers money,then giving a foul mouthed violent rant to the reporter telling the story,SCUM, and I don't care if some think its racist
another labour form ticking black female mp resigns because she cant tell the truth about her son taking/selling drugs whilst employed by her, on taxpayers money,then giving a foul mouthed violent rant to the reporter telling the story,SCUM, and I do
Yes mighty mac I know, I'm my own worst enemy :) I'd say I'd watch it because I like Rachel Paris but that would of course be "sexist"!
I watched about 2 minutes and turned it off the previous week, this week I managed maybe 15.
I suppose watching that sh1te - it's a bit like rubber necking a car accident, you don't WANT to see how bad it is, but you kind of DO.
Yes mighty mac I know, I'm my own worst enemy :) I'd say I'd watch it because I like Rachel Paris but that would of course be "sexist"!I watched about 2 minutes and turned it off the previous week, this week I managed maybe 15. I suppose watching tha
Osamor had apparently previously claimed she knew nothing about Ishmael’s legal case until after the sentencing. It has since been reported that she must have been aware of the case before this because she had written to the trial judge asking for leniency.
Nice to know we can trust our MPs.
Osamor had apparently previously claimed she knew nothing about Ishmael’s legal case until after the sentencing. It has since been reported that she must have been aware of the case before this because she had written to the trial judge asking for
doridoru fuming about nonsense again. I can see his arteries throbbing as he spends his saturday watching nonsensical youtubes.
Of course the usual suspects quickly run along - even terry mccann is here.
There is no law that makes it a criminal offence to criticise migration and there won't be in "a week or so".
If any of you had the slightest clue how laws work you would be laughing at OP not indulging in a massive bout of pearl clutching.
doridoru fuming about nonsense again. I can see his arteries throbbing as he spends his saturday watching nonsensical youtubes.Of course the usual suspects quickly run along - even terry mccann is here.There is no law that makes it a criminal offenc
dave - so the UN Global Compact Meeting aint happening on December 10-11 in Morrocco?
Have you seen the agenda for that meeting? I'm hoping to go although sadly they're not accepting any more registrations. Would still like to be there,...
dave - so the UN Global Compact Meeting aint happening on December 10-11 in Morrocco? Have you seen the agenda for that meeting? I'm hoping to go although sadly they're not accepting any more registrations. Would still like to be there,...
This is the relevant part of the non-binding document. Which bit do you disagree with? Where does it say that it is a criminal offence to criticise migration? Note the bolded part.
OBJECTIVE 17: Eliminate all forms of discrimination and promote evidence-based public discourse to shape perceptions of migration 33. We commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination, condemn and counter expressions, acts and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, violence, xenophobia and related intolerance against all migrants in conformity with international human rights law. We further commit to promote an open and evidence-based public discourse on migration and migrants in partnership with all parts of society, that generates a more realistic, humane and constructive perception in this regard. We also commit to protect freedom of expression in accordance with international law, recognizing that an open and free debate contributes to a comprehensive understanding of all aspects of migration. To realize this commitment, we will draw from the following actions: a) Enact, implement or maintain legislation that penalizes hate crimes and aggravated hate crimes targeting migrants, and train law enforcement and other public officials to identify, prevent and respond to such crimes and other acts of violence that target migrants, as well as to provide medical, legal and psychosocial assistance for victims b) Empower migrants and communities to denounce any acts of incitement to violence directed towards migrants by informing them of available mechanisms for redress, and ensure that those who actively participate in the commission of a hate crime targeting migrants are held accountable, in accordance with national legislation, while upholding international human rights law, in particular the right to freedom of expression c) Promote independent, objective and quality reporting of media outlets, including internetbased information, including by sensitizing and educating media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology, investing in ethical reporting standards and advertising, and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants, in full respect for the freedom of the media 25 d) Establish mechanisms to prevent, detect and respond to racial, ethnic and religious profiling of migrants by public authorities, as well as systematic instances of intolerance, xenophobia, racism and all other multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination in partnership with National Human Rights Institutions, including by tracking and publishing trends analyses, and ensuring access to effective complaint and redress mechanisms e) Provide migrants, especially migrant women, with access to national and regional complaint and redress mechanisms with a view to promoting accountability and addressing governmental actions related to discriminatory acts and manifestations carried out against migrants and their families f) Promote awareness-raising campaigns targeted at communities of origin, transit and destination in order to inform public perceptions regarding the positive contributions of safe, orderly and regular migration, based on evidence and facts, and to end racism, xenophobia and stigmatization against all migrants g) Engage migrants, political, religious and community leaders, as well as educators and service providers to detect and prevent incidences of intolerance, racism, xenophobia, and other forms of discrimination against migrants and diasporas and support activities in local communities to promote mutual respect, including in the context of electoral campaigns
This is the relevant part of the non-binding document. Which bit do you disagree with? Where does it say that it is a criminal offence to criticise migration? Note the bolded part.OBJECTIVE 17: Eliminate all forms of discrimination and promote evi
It is about facilitating the take over which they actually don't quite understand what that means ho ho It is about silencing any critique of the position of open borders and flooding countries with the 'right' sort. Submit.
It is about facilitating the take over which they actually don't quite understand what that means ho hoIt is about silencing any critique of the position of open borders and flooding countries with the 'right' sort.Submit.
dave, dori came to the tennis forum and thought it were directly UN folks in the video.
Report• Quote • Block User doridoru • December 1, 2018 3:22 PM GMT Watch the video you idiot, the UN guy says it will be criminal
It took a very kind reminder from us that he might want to read the description of his own video for him to realise it were MEPs from far-right European parties.
That's how well he researched the thing. He doesn't care anyway as long as it gives him a reason to play victim and be outraged.
dave, dori came to the tennis forum and thought it were directly UN folks in the video.Report• Quote • Block User doridoru • December 1, 2018 3:22 PM GMTWatch the video you idiot, the UN guy says it will be criminalIt took a very kind reminder
edy - I would say the passage you highlight and those you don't spell out a clear agenda to shut down any criticism of migration.
'Hate' is another word for 'criticism'. We've seen many examples of hate speech laws abused by the alleged victims in order to silence critics.
I would sadly predict that the next invented word will be 'migrantphobia'.
From your link: d) Establish mechanisms to prevent, detect and respond to racial, ethnic and religious profiling of migrants by public authorities.
From this this it's clear that study into the benefits or otherwise or specific ethnic groups won't be allowed. Also it paves the way for more denial over which groups commit most crime etc etc.
Lord Pearson was heckled in the the Lords when he asked the Govt if they did any studies into the spread of Islam through the birth rate.
It's all part of globalist propaganda to remove all trace of existing strong, most often white, Christian cultures.
edy - I would say the passage you highlight and those you don't spell out a clear agenda to shut down any criticism of migration.'Hate' is another word for 'criticism'. We've seen many examples of hate speech laws abused by the alleged victims in ord
it will make mentioning telford or rotherham a have crime or saying we will be flooded with romainians
now up to 450,000 just as farage (branded as a scaremonger) predicted
it will make mentioning telford or rotherham a have crimeor saying we will be flooded with romainiansnow up to 450,000 just as farage (branded as a scaremonger) predicted
migration is to become a human right free speech is being removed as a human right
meanwhile they're trying to normalize things like paedophilia
we live in dangerous times, people
migration is to become a human rightfree speech is being removed as a human right meanwhile they're trying to normalize things like paedophiliawe live in dangerous times, people
From what I've read many countries are against this, Italy in particular are outraged and are boycotting the entire meeting.
The traiterous skum who run the UK however seem up for signing it.
Why do our politicians hate us so much? What did we do to deserve them?
From what I've read many countries are against this, Italy in particular are outraged and are boycotting the entire meeting.The traiterous skum who run the UK however seem up for signing it.Why do our politicians hate us so much? What did we do to de
Just read about a campaign to ban the classic song "cold outside" as it promotes "date r@pe".
What is this world coming to...
" self appointed and pro offended muppets? "Just read about a campaign to ban the classic song "cold outside" as it promotes "date r@pe".What is this world coming to...
Why do people vote for political parties who hate the British people? Immigrants come here from all over tge world and they give them equal rights money and housing,why? Its not like they have done anything to deserve it. If a politcal party can't put the British people first then they will get my vote or support
Why do people vote for political parties who hate the British people? Immigrants come here from all over tge world and they give them equal rights money and housing,why? Its not like they have done anything to deserve it.If a politcal party can't put
Why do people vote for political parties who hate the British people? Immigrants come here from all over tge world and they give them equal rights money and housing,why? Its not like they have done anything to deserve it. If a politcal party can't put the British people first then they will get my vote or support
Why do people vote for political parties who hate the British people? Immigrants come here from all over tge world and they give them equal rights money and housing,why? Its not like they have done anything to deserve it.If a politcal party can't put
I've always wondered why people put so much faith in politicians and expect them to take decisions in their favor. Last week I was just thinking it over and thought about how merkel is still the chancellor after importing a million unwanted people. Brexit is still a debate even though the referendum happened in 2016. Politicians will win, irrespective of how ridiculous their plans are.
At the moment, my faith in politicians stands at zero. It was always there, but I always attributd it to my own ignorance. Now i've seen a few events in my own lifetime and confirmed what I always believed. That the politicians are all in it together and the public is only there to be ruled.
At some point in the future, there will be a leader who'll set this right. But he won't do that because the public wanted it. He'll do that because the agenda of the ruling elite changed direction. Right now, the agenda fks the native Europeans. It'll stay like that for a few decades. These things have absolutely nothing the do with your leader being good or bad. The only relevant thing for you is whether their agenda fks u, or works in your favor. Merkel achieved something unique. She imported a million unwanted people and still survived the elections and stayed on as the leader. Is there someone who did something at that scale and still survived the election, without the help of war or his military?
My point is, politicians have ALWAYS had their own agenda. You, the general public, are sometimes on the right side of it, and sometimes on the wrong side. We will all be on the wrong side for a few decades to come. Our best bet is to hope one day the politicians find a new agenda that doesnt fk us directly. In 2016, working at the border during the migrant crisis, I kept telling people that the migrants aren't to be blamed. Its your own govt thats fking you. I was called a musim apologist. From then till now, people are somehow waiting for the very same politicians to make things right, without even bothering to ask why they created the mess(more importantly, they still havent realized they dont even have the power to ask)
So now you can't criticize migrants and you are all going crazy about it. What did you all achieve when it was allowed to criticize migrants? Fk all. At what point do people realize the politicians have a lot of power and they aren't wasting it serving the sheep?
I've always wondered why people put so much faith in politicians and expect them to take decisions in their favor. Last week I was just thinking it over and thought about how merkel is still the chancellor after importing a million unwanted people. B
If Brexit is stopped then I think UKIP or UKIP-like parties will get a HUGE boost in support. I've never voted UKIP but I'd be so disgusted at the arrogant condescending b(stards in the major parties, I'd consider it myself.
The above comments about having no faith in politicians is spot on, I didn't have that much but it's plummeting fast.
If Brexit is stopped then I think UKIP or UKIP-like parties will get a HUGE boost in support. I've never voted UKIP but I'd be so disgusted at the arrogant condescending b(stards in the major parties, I'd consider it myself.The above comments about h