No poppy Corbyn

he's always going to be wrong where most of you are concerned.

He's got a lot in common with STUDYFROM here.

Yes Jeremy is a good human being, still lives off his MP salary. What's he do with the extra for being leader of the opposition about 60k give it to good causes ? No he sticks it in an investment fund ! As I've said many times before "All the animals are equal, but some are more equal than others"

How much extra is that, Dan?

He wore a poppy though too, didn't he...
Which was what this thread was supposedly about.

It's is just over 60k studyform. And yes poor laziness on my part just jumped on here. My gripe was/is he's a scruffy coont who out of respect could of turned himself out better

Pure ffs

Send us a picture Dan - let's see what you scrub up like

Picture George Clooney you'll get the idea Crystal oh and btw I'm not representing a political party or wanting to run the country........oh hang on and you lot thought the Donald was bad

In the words of the smartly turned out politician, Boris Johnson, (when asked about £250,000)... chicken feed.

Desperate Dan

I suppose if the OP hadn't wrongly accused JC of not wearing a poppy you would have started a sartorial thread, given that you feel so strongly about it.

absolute garbage from the tory/donny fanboys , dear me the tory lie machine must have a fast line to these gullible people

No reasoning with the likes of study form, anxious and crystalhunt.
I joined BF back near the beginning and used to enjoy chitchat when this forum was started but there is no engagement with people like these.
People are generally neither 100% right or wrong but the sad individuals named above make me despair of contributing to threads like these.
Mission accomplished, chaps.

I too have been using this forum for a long time. about 14 years, and I should think I have contributed even more than you have, RacingCert.
I've started: competitions, general chat, cooking, medical, comedy and joke threads, quizzes and more. I even met my mrs on here, I've met or personally know about 25 others, and have communicated personally with about 25 more, so engagement with me is incredibly easy.

I've never said who or what I support politically, it's just assumed because, like you, people assume things.
This forum has become buggered by the sheer volume of politics all over it. And by the infiltration of constant right-wing content, which started around the time of the BNP and its requesting of its members to spread the word online. It never stopped since.

What I've done on this thread, as I do on others, is point out the stupidity of it. The OP was wrong, the majority of (the same old) contributors have used it as another political - in this case anti-corbyn, platform.
It could just as easily been Trump, Muslims, Yaxley or brexit.
What you seem to want to see is the same people making the same points over and over again. Anyone who disagrees or points out how ridiculous any of the assertions might be is a "sad individual".
Well, in this case, I do think you're 100% wrong.
No-one has written more (and most politicos will disagree it's for the right reasons) than I have, bemoaning the state of this forum, its lack of traffic, and what it's become. The virtual destruction of the place is almost entirely due to non-stop divisive and political content.

If you want to engage or reason with me, just talk sensibly and don't go all Daily Mail or Breitbart.
Not that it will ever happen, but if ALL political content was banned from this forum, THEN it would be mission accomplished.

Studyform,
Thank you for your partly respectful response.
A couple of things.
It is outrageous to suggest that I want to see the same people making the same points.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
I hold great store by the old Japanese question ... when a finger points to a star, do you look at the star or the finger.
Secondly, Daily fricking Mail? Where on god’s earth do you extract that from on anything I have ever written?
However you are correct on one thing politics is better out of chitchat, as in a pub don’t talk religion or politics.

Finger pointing OP must be blind.

That's what you'd call a poppy that was present but didn't want to be involved.

I think the answer, RacingCert, to your Japanese question rather depends on whether or not you're a dog.

My apologies for grouping you with the unbending forum users your initial post seemed to make you appear like.
(A little scout round the forum WILL show the same people making the same points, A LOT - to prove my point).

Well done on a general dismissal of the Daily fricking Mail. Just Breitbart to denounce now

It might be nice for all those jumping on the "Corbyn... Grrrr" bandwagon to admit they were wrong!
Not a chance though. And THAT is what I pick up on. Yet still am able to reason.

It would be fine if he wasn’t a pacifist

In 1935 the Labour Party was led by George Lansbury and pledged never to take part in any war
This mattered because Hitler was listening

Seeing Brown and Blair there makes me wish for some pacifism...

Thank you Studyform.
Apology accepted. Such graciousness seems rare. Is it the first time anyone has ever apologised on here?
My best wishes to to you.
I hope you continue to strive to reason.
Even if you occasionally get things wrong.

wonderful , I’m sure the people that Hitler’s regime sent to the concentration camps would agree

: ) poor study , yes racing cert at least he apologised

I'm amazed that this thread is still going, as the OP got it so badly wrong!!. Why the OP could not be more respectful himself and wait 2 minutes and double check his assertion displays obsessive behaviour IMO.

I know I know, this post of mine is helping the thread to keep going. BTW, I thought his bow was particularly respectful, I am not a Corbyn fan, or threads based on a false premise.

must admit feel a little bit sorry for Corby over this , don’t mind really if he was a little bit scruffy , he probably thought he looked fine !
he did really . I’m a bit like that myself , even a new suit makes me feel uncomfortable

Some very disappointing post's yesterday, Remembrance Sunday and also the 100th Anniversary of the signing of the Amristice. Surely a time for reflection on those who gave their todays for our tomorrows.

Instead we get the same old tu rds posting absolute sheite. Some complaing about a coat with a hood and others about whether or not someone was wearing a poppy.

Shame on some of you and a pox upon your houses!

lfc1971    12 Nov 18 16:18 
It would be fine if he wasn’t a pacifist

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/jeremy-corbyn-syria_uk_5ad9eef4e4b09442d8076d93


you can scrub that one off your list

I suppose in any group of people there will always be the one who is the scruffiest.
In this case, amongst the thousands there, it was Jeremy Corbyn.

Racing cert im puzzled by your waffling on about this , scruffy this scruffy that , who has the biggest poppy blah blah , seriously it was 100 year remembrance and all you do is waffle on about corbyn , does anybody really care about this rubbish about what people wear

Hey anxious, hope you are well and winning . We don't agree about things, but I'm with you on this one.

*We don't always agree*

Hello Boxing hope you to are well and winning too mate , strange thread this one

Yeah most peculiar.

So anxious, you don’t disagree he was scruffy, wasn’t he.
I think we are done.

Is the word Muslim on this thread anywhere,would surely be some sort of record this many posts without bringing that word in..

Nov 12, 2018 -- 6:53PM, thegiggilo wrote:

Is the word Muslim on this thread anywhere,would surely be some sort of record this many posts without bringing that word in..

It is now,

boxing you are just too much

Thank you moisok.

Racing no i dont think he was scruffy but i dont think he was dressed like marks and spencer doll either  , the point is surely your moaning is all about image , he paid his respects like everybody else , unless there is some moral dress code then what is the problem ? ,  its all about cheap political points scoring i think

Exactly the kind of the thing the daily mail does

My comments were on the sartorial.
Politics is too tribal. I cannot associate myself with any group.
Let’s agree to differ.
Ciao.

Racing cert im puzzled by your waffling on about this , scruffy this scruffy that , who has the biggest poppy blah blah , seriously it was 100 year remembrance and all you do is waffle on about corbyn , does anybody really care about this rubbish about what people wear


I do, he's a scruffy coont

The word Muslim should certainly not appear here, because as we always say, It's got nothing to do with Islam!

The proper protocol at an occasions such as these is to turn out in your Sunday best.

Anything less shows at the very least ignorance. And worse, that you're not showing proper respect for the occasion.

Take your pick which applies to Corbyn.

why has islam got nothing to do with this Dr slicer

I thought it was obvious - they seem to be largely absent from anything like this

Because, Mr OK, Islam has never got anything to do with anything even when it has! I hope this clarifies the matter.

yes but will hampton and richmond win twonite

I hope you have apologised along with the Oz PM!!!

Well, they are 1-0 up. But if they don't win, I have to point out that it will be nothing to do with Islam or for that matter Jezza Dustbin turning up with a poppy but looking scruffy!

HOW DO YOU KNOW!!?????

Didn't take long...

The doctor has spoken and he nose. It has nothing to do with it so there!!!

hampton and richmond crushing the northern thugs

It looked like Corbyn had got his anorak on inside out.

Can anybody confirm that?

He'd left the coat hanger in as well.

coathanger, lol

its used as a goalpost by his bairns

That's not funny STUDYFORM, you're just making yourself look a berk.

Well done.
I've taught you a new word.

There you go again. You just can't help yourself.

Watching Have I got a bit extra news for you. Corbyn in that anorak riding his bike. Approached a right turn only road..........the direction he went ? Fxxking left now there's a surprise

Corbyn looked like a tramp in charity clothes.
Has spent all his life supporting terrorists.
And people want this hypocrite as PM, shameful.

Lol predictable drivel again from the outraged defenders of the Imperialists

defenders of the Imperialists

Corbyn wasn't 'formal' but he was 'smart' in the sense his jacket didn't have holes in it or look like it needed washing etc.
He represents the average person in the street, no airs nor graces. He did what was expected of him.

While charlie turned up with ceremonial sword and costume, representing the armed forces he is now head of after mummy bequeathed it him like a toy given a child.
Just like each opening of parliament they turn out in their traditional gimp costumes to impose a whiff of prestige and privilege that keeps people under the boot.
40million people were killed in WW1 alone....how many of those were finely dressed royals?

other than the Russian cousins that were dragged from their beds that is

Corbyn's got his reasons for not dressing up on Remembrance Sunday.

If he wants to upset people that's all right by me, bring it on Jezza!

It just means fewer votes for him at the next general election.

Mr Bin-the last ENGLISH King to die in battle was Richard the Third.

Yet showing disrespect on a national day of mourning like Corbyn did on Remembrance Sunday, does serve to show the vast gulf there exists between ordinary working people and the left-wing politicians who pretend to represent their interests.

Yes Slicer
Ive already used that in this very thread.

George III last one to lead too.

Its correct to remember and to be respectful, but lets not continually cover up for why things happened the way they did.
Most wars were either directly or indirectly the result of colonialist power struggles, even innocent little Belgium was in on it, King Leopold II perhaps the worst despot in history in my view.
So don't be blinded with all of the pomp and ceremony and point scoring by those who manufacture power with people forget the disparity of those ruined by war and those who gloried in it.

DrC
There was no disrespect shown by Corbyn. What rankles with me is how the likes Mrs Brown down Old Kent road are lead to believe her sons/grandsons etc died for something.

Then dustybin, what's the point in rubbing their noses in it?

I don't see where anyone are having their noses rubbed in anything.
The constant as with all things is to become informed, portrayal of things based on emotion allow for continued injustices.

People maybe forgiven for forgetting, but as far as Im aware every family who lost a member in WW1 were issued with a ceremonial plaque, colloquially referred to as the 'Death Penny'. We still have ours from my Great Grandfather, its in a frame on my wall because remembrance isn't about 1 day a year for me.
Around the perimeter of this bronze plaque reads 'He died for freedom and for honour'

Well its a bit late talking about freedom when the last 400 years had been about ruining other peoples isn't it?

If you tell people their sons died for nothing, I'd say that's rubbing their noses in it.

WW1 did die for nothing
Cos WW2 occured within 20 years

Never again.
Good God

Anyway this isnt about that, this is about the continued attempt at disparaging somebody who represents people in their own right, they dont have to wear the clothes others want them to wear in doing it.

Never let it be said that Mr Corbyn can't manage an appropriate floral tribute to the dead when the occasion demands it.

Well they were his friends, unlike the British dead!!!!

Still no ties though! I think we have to accept he doesn't dress like others. Can't say it bothers me in the slightest.

Dusty's profound and heart wrenching conclusion on WW1 is far more troubling...

Each year we 'remember' but when will we ever debate the foolishness of WW1?

Nov 13, 2018 -- 11:52AM, Dr Crippen wrote:

Yet showing disrespect on a national day of mourning like Corbyn did on Remembrance Sunday, does serve to show the vast gulf there exists between ordinary working people and the left-wing politicians who pretend to represent their interests.

Not like you to make things up to suit your diatribe, crippen.
(1.01 you need to look it up).

I notice a few posts from screaming beneath the waves too, nothing practical, just more anti-corbyn.

What is it with those of you who feel the need to hate Corbyn at every opportunity - whatever he does.
Do any of you think it'll make a difference to anything, by your constant digging?
Does it make you feel good?

To answer an earlier post from treetop...
No, I haven't seen the same thing on here about May.
A few mentions when, like any politician she'll be castigated.
But if a similar thread, especially if the thread turned out to be wrong, there is no way there would be anything the crap that's all over this thread.

Note: I'm still not saying what I support - you can all assume what you like as usual. I'm just pointing out a little of the crap that has so spoiled this forum.
It's what I like doing - In response to what you like doing.

But aren't we here to disagree?

Nice to see STUDYFORM's still on the boil after the roasting he's taken the last couple of nights on here.

Whoosh - went for me first post.

There should be the comment BBV after most of his posts.

1.01 he has to look that up.

is this the right room for an argument?

https://youtu.be/wxrbOVeRonQ

Crippen... I "went for" one of your even more ridiculous posts.
You honestly think, I mean really, even in your very strange world, that I've taken a "roasting" the last couple of nights? and that I'm "boiling"?
I mean really?
That is very hard to understand. But as it's you, it'll be a touch more grist for the mill if I get bored later.
There was me thinking I was having a little sport, and once again exploiting your lack of intelligence, humour and common sense in just a few posts.

You could try - though this won't happen justifying the post I quoted... This one:
Yet showing disrespect on a national day of mourning like Corbyn did on Remembrance Sunday, does serve to show the vast gulf there exists between ordinary working people and the left-wing politicians who pretend to represent their interests.

Now, pointing out the fact that you wrote some unfounded rubbish (again), doesn't give me a "leftie" etc etc title. It just shows that you make stuff up.
Your post was wrong, a lie, if you will, but I have no doubt you will either completely ignore this fact or try to justify it with more crap.

BBV? You're right, I have no idea what it means. Did you make it up?
Unless it's Blood Borne Virus, is it? Do you have a BBV? Is it syphilis? That affects the brain, so it could be.
I don't understand why you'd want me to type BBV after each post. Is it the letters after your name?


Injera, nothing wrong with a little debate and disagreement, but the subject tends to be the same. I mean, have a look through this thread. Many of the points are in no way a debate they are statements based on determination to push home the same thing as every day, on loads of threads.

In some cases - crippen being a main example - I find it hard to actually agree. So in that regard you're definitely right, imo.

Now, I'm busy doing some paperwork for the next couple of hours. I'll be back to read your twaddle later, crippen.

Corbyn prepares for rain; Trump doesn't bother because of it.

Corbyn prepares for rain; Trump doesn't bother because of it.

I'll give you that one

To answer an earlier post from treetop...

Haven't got a clue what you are on about Study,I don't take all this too seriously,just banter and we shouldn't get too intense talking about trivia.My opinions about Corbyn began 48 years ago when he disrupted the final year of my degree.

treetop  • November 11, 2018 9:08 PM GMT 
It doesn't matter what Corbyn does, he's always going to be wrong where most of you are concerned.
As does the reverse situation with May and the tories ?

That's what I was answering. It did have a ? and included a line copied and pasted from my earlier post!

Dr Crippen    13 Nov 18 11:52 
Yet showing disrespect on a national day of mourning like Corbyn did on Remembrance Sunday, does serve to show the vast gulf there exists between ordinary working people and the left-wing politicians who pretend to represent their interests.



What utter utter crap.

dustybin
WW1 did die for nothing
Cos WW2 occured within 20 years
Never again.
Good God

Cannot fathom the point in that post. Are you suggesting we should just have rolled over in WW1 and allowed events to unfold?
WW1 stopped one evil faction in its tracks as did WW2.

This is the way internet debates go now. Right and Left act the same way.

95% of people are not interested in the facts of a particular event. Because they have already decided who is right or wrong before the event occurs. eg Trump is always right. Trump is always wrong. There are people who will blame Trump for absolutely everything and then people who will never admit he has ever done anything wrong.

This thread a great example: Corbyn did not wear a poppy. On page 1 it is established that he was wearing one, but that does not matter, Corbyn has to be in the wrong so just move the goalposts and carry on attacking him. Anyone reading the OP and skipping to page 3 of the thread would think he definitely was not wearing one.

The left did a similar thing with Serena Williams when she attacked the umpire: She said he penalized her because of sexism or racism, that he would not have done the same to male players, and the left were all over it, demanding tennis had to be overhauled to stop stuff like this happening to Serena. It was quickly established that the umpire had a very consistent record of applying these penalties to big name male players too, so at that point could everyone just admit Serena was wrong, or just move on and shut up about it ? No, because Serena Williams is a big deal in identity politics and so she can never be wrong. There then followed days of articles of Serena as victim (with goalposts moves as they could no longer pretend the umpire was just picking on her alone).

Two terrible comparisons,most people in britain can't stand trump be they labour or conservative,certainly no conservatives i know, most despise him and again this left thing with serena williams maybe there were some sticking up for her but in general most people thought she was acting like a brat..

I'd agree with most of that Tobe, except maybe your confusing "the left" with "the diversity" or the "PC brigade".

It's this constant everything that idealistic students and the righteous being called "the left" that makes me as active against as much as I am on here.
And which creates the stuff you mention.

Here's a list:
Trump
Brexit
Abortion
Muslims
Immigration
(possibly) Ukip
Corbyn
Khan
Abbott
Yaxley
(maybe, if they haven't been forgotten) people on the dole

I'll lay money that most people on here have identical views on most or all of these.
I'll lay equally that there are less than 5% who don't have mixed views on them.

It is down to 2 things.
1 The internet
2 People giving up joining in on the forum because they're fed up with it all.

Surprised to see abortion in that list SF.
For me I've mixed emotions on the subject but would be opposed to either extreme, ie no restrictions or a total ban.
Trump I find fascinating and I'm neither a hater or a supporter. No graces but seems to have enough support for a second term to be a possibility.
Immigration is always presented on here as either for or against which completely ignores the middle ground of controlled immigration.
Muslims, my issues would be with the extremists along with those trying to force their laws upon us.
Second guessing you're probably right with the rest.

akabula • November 14, 2018 1:45 AM GMT
dustybin
WW1 did die for nothing
Cos WW2 occured within 20 years
Never again.
Good God

Cannot fathom the point in that post. Are you suggesting we should just have rolled over in WW1 and allowed events to unfold?
WW1 stopped one evil faction in its tracks as did WW2.

It was a response to DrC's assertion that I was rubbing noses in it by suggesting people died in WW1 for nothing.
It was somewhat glib a response but accurate I believe. WW1 achieved nothing since the problem festered and a second world war ignited after we had supposedly learned the lessons, 'the war that ends all wars'.
Well my shaping of my argument is that rhetoric like that are used to attempt to give value to (in this case sacrifice) or to justify a means.

If we are to assess the criteria of 'why' these wars occurred we can't be so myopic as to say its because an existential threat appeared overnight, because it didn't.
Its the continuing of the lie that everyone else is wrong apart from us.
The reason wars of that nature materialised is because of the actions that preceded them.
Germany emulated Britain and France in colonising other countries (the mining of other's potential for our own behest) and a power struggle insued, all the rest was just vehicles and excused for war, wars that are fought not by those in power, but of those without.

All actions have consequences. This is why Im willing to listen to (if not Corbyn) people of the mindset that we have to address our own issues if we expect others to do the same.....and only if others become grossly unreasonable for no good reason then we fight.

What a fantastically hypocritical thread - first the o.p shows more disrespect by actually making the pointless thread in the first place seeing as Corbyn was wearing a poppy and  obv doesn't see that his actions are disrespectful if he is as genuinely angry as he claims. Secondly all this a day after the Snowflake in Chief disrespected, basically the whole war, by not bothering to turn up and honour the dead from his country because of a little rain and not one mention from you lot. There is a thread on the politics forum on the Snnowflake in Cheif's non showing if you would all like to show your disgust over there - I'll bump it and expect many replies from you........

I apologise to Mr Fishwick as he did mention Trump and at least ufc can comment on it a few times

It’s all a bit tribal on here.
Perhaps chitchatters should go back to the days of “What’s your fav” threads.
Nobody on here’s been the slightest bit interested in how Sussanah Reid ended up with a bandaged finger this morning or what Rachael Riley wears.
Instead it’s just lobbing poo bags over the barricades at each other.

At the end of the day Corbyn's just a scruff.

The Worzel Gummidge of politics.

I remember Cameron taunting him in Parliament over his unkempt appearance when he said.

Put on a proper suit,  do up your tie and sing the national anthem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RwKi0fJaDI

Dear me crippen how many posts have you done on this non story , anybody analysing this would say you have developed an obsession bordering on a pathological fixation on Jeremy , truly surreal and  pathetic rambling

Put on a proper suit,  do up your tie, and sing the national anthem.

What's wrong with that? It's good advice in my opinion.

He's like a dog with a bone

A dog with a rag and bone man more like.