Grenfell, wherefore art thou?

Why was it Removed ?

Must have got fruity...

Seen worse Em, a lot Worse

On the bright side, Spurs won..

Thought there was a bright side

STUDY appears to have disappeared ,he was in a Furious state near  the end of the thread ..

Crumbs...

pending charges i would have thought.. fancy they will find something to stick on em

The censorship is getting a bit tiresome imo, arrogant would be another way of describing it.

casemoney
STUDY appears to have disappeared ,he was in a Furious state near  the end of the thread

Study been in a right bad mood since he heard Posh wouldn't be in the Spice Girls reunion tour.

For those who didn't see the Grenfell thread before it was deleted,  I put up a link to another newly proven despicable case of massive Fraud, where the perpetrator claimed over £100k off the back of the tragedy. 

A far more newsworthy story than the 'bad taste video nasty' that emerged this week, and the latest in a long line of entirely predictable Grenfell frauds.

.
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/deplorable-grenfell-fraud-claimed-100000-pretending-lived-victims-103419234.html

This was in someones back garden and apart from being in really bad taste I can't see any criminality.
Heard they were being charged with public order offences which seems strange for a private event.

The public order offence was surely the filming and posting on social media the incident

For those who didn't see the Grenfell thread before it was deleted,  I put up a link to another newly proven despicable case of massive Fraud, where the perpetrator claimed over £100k off the back of the tragedy. 

A far more newsworthy story than the 'bad taste video nasty' that emerged this week, and the latest in a long line of entirely predictable Grenfell frauds.


sod the whataboutery, both/all incidents are equally deplorable.

If it was a genuine claim... how the hell are you able to claim £100k in benefits in 12 months?

Being a non white foreigner with a hard luck story goes a long way.

Vision a Fair Point  , the Payments appear to be Unreal ,Hundred Bags for What ?

accommodation???? four or five star hotels arent cheap and k&c still have quite a few in them

i know its a different point altogether but, from what i've seen, it looks like the establishment are lining up the fire brigade as the fall guys for the fire.

I agree with Saddo.

They did a bit of a Merkel tbf, made it clear there would be no barrier to help whether you were here legally or not, and a possible chunk at the end of it. What could possibly go wrong.

Nov 6, 2018 -- 10:13PM, casemoney wrote:

STUDY appears to have disappeared ,he was in a Furious state near  the end of the thread ..

Are you sure?
WAC

I wasn't remotely furious. I went to bed.
Having spent hours pointing out the stupidity all over the thread, the last thing I would want was its removal.

Quite apart from the obvious fact that I wouldn't ask for such a thing.
If I have something to say to you casemoney, I'll say it.

There are some VERY sad, not very nice people on here. I am neither of those things

and the double or treble sub letting

stop mithering you tart

i wreck on that this latest moral panic tops the mithering chart for my the ring

Just imagine you were round a friends house for drinks and fireworks and some genius comes out with a cardboard box ect ect... what do you do? If i'm honest i'd groan and maybe giggle a bit. Now if i'm arrested for that, I'd be furious and pretty much unrepentant..

nonono   they must be hunted down

meanwhile in rotherham   and Landistan!!!

You're right, emitdeb.
Until it gets posted online for public enjoyment.

I'm not saying what they did was a crime, but it WAS wrong.

I’m with Emitdeb on this. I’ve heard and seen far worst jokes played whilst at BBQs and house parties after a gallon. In fact I’d probably have not even groaned had I been at this bonfire party.

The thread on this which some snot-gobbling sulker had removed, would have said roughly the same as the last few posts, had it not been conflated with;
"paedo gangs", "Khan", "immigrants", "Labour", "lefties" and anything else which seems compulsory nowadays.

Although I've seen a few filtering in to this thread again.

The law is the law, not a comfort blanket for snowflakes.

Clearly not intended to be taken seriously, in poor taste, certainly. But so what? Do we ban all comedy, pranks or jokes that are in poor taste. Just another step toward wrongthink.

WALOFS

If we ban people for poor taste and offensive behaviour, then Frankie Boyle would have been banned years ago,
Oh, but wait a minute,he only slags off the tories, UKIP, disabled people and the Jews so thats ok, thats called comedy by the lefties and the beeb,and they  love him..

Had they kept it, as a very controversial event (albeit wrong to involve children) it wouldn't have become such an emotive issue!

The mistake was to have posted it for others to see....

STUDYFORM • November 7, 2018 6:34 PM GMT
.............. some snot-gobbling sulker ...............

Is it that difficult to comment on a post without resorting to disgusting , childish insults ?

sniff

Lux nailed with his post. I don't understood why people are so upset,why don't they vent their distain on the people responsible for the dreadful fire in the first place,ie Westminster Council

Hopefully Norwood conservative club will be banning them being regulars....

or the sub sub letters who they gave amnesty too or the dozens of crimes associated with that tower
hmmmmm

I like a bit of balance.

Have they arrested anyone over the real fire yet or was it an "Act of God"?

Reynard, that "insult" was directed at whichever toerag reported the thread and had it removed.
Sorry if it somehow offended YOU.
But then this was a thread about being offended.
Strange how different things offend different people, isn't it?

Who reported it / had it removed ?

Some snot-gobbling sulker.

Like everything on here, it was anonymously done.

I don't think you should hurl insults at somebody if you haven't got a clue who they are . It may even have been the other person on the thread that shared your opinion .

I think reporting and getting threads removed is reprehensible.
I'll take the chance on who's upset by my hurling.
Also, I have a few ideas as to who does it the most.

All of whom are snot-gobbling sulkers.
And if that's the worst thing they get called, I'll be amazed.

I wish my wife would call me a "snot-gobbling sulker" instead of the fiendish names she does call me

Just take down some of her threads, baphornet.

Don't see the point tbh. If you can't debate then go on twitter and namecall all you want

Whoosh

I was debating plenty, and the thread was removed.
I have insulted whoever was enough of a tw@ to arrange this occurrence.

Not only have you not understood a pretty good joke, but you've also berated me for the opposite of what I've done.

Head has now banged SO much wall it's actually wobbling around on the other side.

I'm sorry you seem to have misinterpreted my words, Studyform. My "you can't" meant anyone on here, and not you peronally.

*s

You're welcome.

And again in reference to my earlier words; i would never berate anyone on a forum as i don't see the point. Once again that wasn't meant personally, Studyform

Just stick around mate, you will eventually.

lol i doubt it; that's what i get called names for by 'she who rules' i'm far too placid

I think she said flacid.

Well yes that's another matter

STUDYFORM
I think reporting and getting threads removed is reprehensible.-

Yet you reported me SF.

Give it a rest mate, it's been explained, debated, done to death, and like so much else is just another stalkery little pop at me.
Do you really get that much of a thrill out of trying to contradict me?
Do you really have nothing better to do?

The Grenfell Memorial Advent Calendar has just arrived.  I see all the chocolates have melted though

https://unherd.com/2018/11/let-morons-laugh-grenfell/

A good article on this subject:

"This embrace of PC culture by the police didn’t happen in isolation. It is a regrettable by-product of a society governed by a cultural and political elite which likes to think of itself as liberal and tolerant but which in reality is the opposite of these things. That’s why we see freedom of expression increasingly treated as a luxury and not a right, not least as a consequence of the proliferation of ‘hate’ legislation, whose effect has been to stifle the voicing of unfashionable opinions. In public services – the police force included – a failure to uphold every facet of equality and diversity rules can mean the end of one’s career."

Do you really get that much of a thrill out of trying to contradict me?

I wasn't contradicting you SF. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of your statement.