Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iudkPi4_sY
So, JP is invited onto a popular Scandinavian late night talk show with a host and panel of "progressives" (inc a Swedish politician and a Norwegian author) and of course they want to quiz him on his views on gender equality. So he explains in great detail how the great social engineering experiment (the most "progressive" one of its kind anywhere in the world, and of all time) in Scandinavian countries (of all places) has been an epic failure - since it did NOT lead to the outcome they all wanted and expected, and in fact had the very opposite effect - it actually made men and women fall even more into their traditional gender roles (producing more male engineers, more female nurses, etc).
But check the look on all the panellists faces when faced with this home truth - they have a look of utter confusion, screwing up their faces like someone's taken a big dump on their brand new rug. They just can't fathom it. These are not stupid people, these are intelligent, and competent people on this show. But they are so blinded by their groupthink ideology that they just cannot accept anything JP is telling them.
Now to be fair to the audience, some of them did get it (you can hear the applause at times), but not this panel.
They have no answer, no debate, no counter-arguments, just the usual knee-jerk soundbites
but but, "feelings matter"
but but, "what's so terrifying about gender equality?"
"boys have to learn to be more sensitive", "to play with dolls"
Like many of JP's interviews on MSM shows, its car crash TV at its best (or worst)
So, JP is invited onto a popular Scandinavian late night talk show with a host and panel of "progressives" (inc a Swedish politician and a Norwegian author) and of course they want to quiz him on his views on gender equality. So he explains in great detail how the great social engineering experiment (the most "progressive" one of its kind anywhere in the world, and of all time) in Scandinavian countries (of all places) has been an epic failure - since it did NOT lead to the outcome they all wanted and expected, and in fact had the very opposite effect - it actually made men and women fall even more into their traditional gender roles (producing more male engineers, more female nurses, etc).
But check the look on all the panellists faces when faced with this home truth - they have a look of utter confusion, screwing up their faces like someone's taken a big dump on their brand new rug. They just can't fathom it. These are not stupid people, these are intelligent, and competent people on this show. But they are so blinded by their groupthink ideology that they just cannot accept anything JP is telling them.
Now to be fair to the audience, some of them did get it (you can hear the applause at times), but not this panel.
They have no answer, no debate, no counter-arguments, just the usual knee-jerk soundbites
but but, "feelings matter"
but but, "what's so terrifying about gender equality?"
"boys have to learn to be more sensitive", "to play with dolls"
Like many of JP's interviews on MSM shows, its car crash TV at its best (or worst)
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 26
|
By:
That looks pretty good with JP spot on as ever Plat. I'll watch the whole thing later. Thanks for the link
|
|
By:
Any job that requires empathy, i.e. nursing etc., is massively fulfilled by women as they are better at that than men. Even in places such as Sweden, which is arguably the most 'gender equal' country on Earth, women make up approximately 95% of nurses. Women have skills that most men lack and men have abilities that most women lack. We should acknowledge these differences and use them to our advantage instead of trying to turn everyone into a homogenous robot. Generations in the past managed it so I don't see why we can't.
|
|
By:
It`s all down to lefties and their pc twaddle.
|
|
By:
I see some policewoman who is the voice of reason is saying they should be concentrating on REAL crime, which is what everyone in the country bar the SJWs want, but of course the SJWs want them to be concentrating instead on going after people who say things that hurt someone's feelings etc.
It's time the SJWs were put back in their playground and told to **** off. |
|
By:
I know JP is a bit of a hero on here to some. Check out his debate with Sam Harris. I'm not sure he comes out so well. I'm not saying he doesn't have a few valid points though.
|
|
By:
He's not infallible, I've seen a couple of people get the better of him in debates on some topics, esp on religion. But never on the PC bull.
|
|
By:
He's on QT next week.
|
|
By:
POPCORN on order
|
|
By:
Yeah, that's fair platini.
|
|
By:
PLATINI is a well known trouble maker
they will throw him out for deliberately crunching in the front row |
|
By:
Not a bad idea. Its gotta be cheaper than a ticket for one of JP's talks. Have you seen the prices ?
 |
|
By:
as much as the Ghanaian remain whinger they advertise in the gurnadian??
|
|
By:
who he ?
|
|
By:
GM, Plat
 |
|
By:
She.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
The left will be fuming that JP is on question time, the bbc already get criticised every time they interview him.
|
|
By:
don't expect too much, he is quiet and measured, they'll cut him off a lot. Hopefully he will get annoyed at this.
|
|
By:
Don't think the format will suit him at all. When was the last time JP answered a question in less than 10 minutes ? On QT you get about 60 secs max.
|
|
By:
add in the interruptions
|
|
By:
They love to call him "far right" to discredit him. I saw some interview the other day where they tried to suggest that because some far right people in the US like him, this must make him some form of nazi.
Which is sensible as saying that some in the KKK like corn flakes so it's a racist breakfast cereal.. Watch for biased leftie sh1thead Dimblelby himself trying it.. |
|
By:
surely if there's a racist cereal it'd be special K(KK)
|
|
By:
Apologies for the crazy smiley in my previous post. The two posts above it were duplicated when I originally posted them & I'd never seen a double duplicate before.
Good of whoever removed it to leave the there. Not. |
|
By:
Btw Hank,
|
|
By:
Hank
|