|
By:
classic 'OH LOOK OVER THERE' statements from 'progressives' to divert attention away from the main issue and severe problem that exists in the community
|
|
By:
When someone pops up to raise awareness of crimes committed and covered up on young girls they decide to attack the TR over something unrelated to make out that he cannot be trusted, the left are just a sick group who need help.
|
|
By:
My view is that Mr Robinsons incarceration was unjust and almost certainly politically motivated - You disagree ?
I disagree it was both to be honest. Sentences are always open to interpretation but to call it unjust is wrong imo. Politically motivated also no. He was prejudicing a very important case. If he hadn't been stopped those men could have called a mistrial and the victims would have had to give testimony again. Mr Robinson , along with a number of others , is concerned that there is a disproportionate threat to vulnerable young girls posed by pakistani muslim men . You are not ? I've yet to see evidence of anything except him solely focusing on muslims and asians and turning a blind eye to everyone else. When he starts turning up outside court to highlight white, British paedophiles then, maybe, I'd start taking him more seriously. I'd take this "concern" more seriously if it wasn't such an obvious deliberate career path. He's a young man with a criminal record. However, he's persuasive and organised and knows a lot of thick, easily influenced people. He's smart enough to monetise that and be able to afford flash homes and nice holidays. Got to give him credit for that to be fair. If you condone such actions and activities then you really need to have a serious look at the evidence . If you think any of that acts as someone condoning child rape then you're beyond help. Maybe if I did something likely to cause a mistrial you could accuse me of that like. |
|
By:
It is not just robinson - it is almost anyone who mentions the heavy muslim connection - like certain labour mps who were attacked and/or demoted by their own party.
4 million votes are more important. |
|
By:
You haven't read the Judge's statement have you PP?
There was NO chance of a mistrial according to the judge. TR's facebook stream could IN NO WAY influence the jury. His inacarciration was illegal. As for not highlighting white gangs raping Pakistani girls for the last 20 years, TR hasn't done this because it's not hapening. The Filth in Rotherham arrested an 11 year old girl for being drunk and disorderly in a house where she was being raped. The men were not charged. The Filth in Rotherham said a 12 year old girl who was raped by 5 men was said she had sex consensually. - Jay Report. |
|
By:
I've yet to see evidence of anything except him solely focusing on muslims and asians and turning a blind eye to everyone else. When he starts turning up outside court to highlight white, British paedophiles then, maybe, I'd start taking him more seriously. I'd take this "concern" more seriously if it wasn't such an obvious deliberate career path. He's a young man with a criminal record. However, he's persuasive and organised and knows a lot of thick, easily influenced people. He's smart enough to monetise that and be able to afford flash homes and nice holidays. Got to give him credit for that to be fair.
He has stated on numerous occasions that he holds the Catholic Church in contempt for the abuse cases within . But these cases are covered in the main by the media . He focuses on highlighting the cases that the media are unwilling to cover . He was prejudicing a very important case. If he hadn't been stopped those men could have called a mistrial and the victims would have had to give testimony again. If you had paid the slightest bit of attention to Tuesdays proceedings at the Old Bailey you'd be fully aware by now that his actions DID NOT prejudice this trial and that he acted within the law at all times . If you prefer to concentrate on Mr Robinsons previous convictions , even exaggerating the seriousness of the charges laid against him , rather than the issues of child rape in many UK towns and cities then you make it clear where your priorities lie . |
|
By:
Sorry , Injera , I didn't realise you'd responded
![]() |
|
By:
Again with the "stop talking about millionaire Yaxley Lennon and focus on the work that I'm paying my subscription for instead please" argument.
He's a public figure and so is worthy of scrutiny. In my opinion he's a modern day snake oil salesmen or TV evangelist. You parroting everything that all his fans say whenever we bring up his crimes or rationale merely confirms you are a paid up member. Way too far down the rabbit hole I reckon. Keep sending your money. Maybe he'll name his yacht after you. |
|
By:
PorcupineorPineapple • October 26, 2018 5:18 PM BST
Again with the "stop talking about millionaire Yaxley Lennon and focus on the work that I'm paying my subscription for instead please" argument. He's a public figure and so is worthy of scrutiny. In my opinion he's a modern day snake oil salesmen or TV evangelist. You parroting everything that all his fans say whenever we bring up his crimes or rationale merely confirms you are a paid up member. Way too far down the rabbit hole I reckon. Keep sending your money. Maybe he'll name his yacht after you. Can you try and keep it simple rather than injecting unsubstantiated nonsense into your argument . It only serves to cloud the issue (intentionally?) . Are you confusing Mr Robinson with the BBC ? I was unaware of any subscription fee , I pay nothing to Mr Robinson or the BBC for that matter . I do not send him money and finally , where is your evidence of this 'yacht' that you speak of ? |
|
By:
How about addressing your earlier remark claiming that "He was prejudicing a very important case" ? That statement has been proven not to be correct . Just throw out unsubstantiated allegations and labels and when proved wrong , throw out more . It really is very difficult having a discussion with someone who blindly refuses to stick to the facts .
|
|
By:
And continuing to refer to those who follow or support Tommy Robinson as "fans" is clearly an attempt to trivialise those who share many of his views and concerns . It's really quite unpleasant to try and demean a large number of like-minded individuals . It's really rather childish .
|
|
By:
yaxley lennon appealed against two counts, the first one in which
he was given a suspended sentence saw his appeal thrown out he faces a retrial on second count it may well be decided he has served enough time ... |
|
By:
Well the reason he was sent to prison was for that so unsubstantiated allegations is simply false. A different judge disagrees and now it's going to the AG.
Sorry if a bit of hyperbole throws you so much. The yacht reference I first used yesterday or maybe the day before. It is simply a means of illustrating the spending of those who newly find themselves very wealthy. Could have been a second home, a posh Jag, a jet plane. I mean if you've got documented evidence he gets sea sick so the yacht reference is way off beam then I wholeheartedly apologise. btw - thanks for the tip on randomly putting words in bold. Given it a go myself. Hope you like it. |
|
By:
I simply highlighted your earlier mistruths and unsubstantiated lablels in bold .
I'll happily respond when you actually post something with sufficient structure so as to constitute an intelligent argument . For now I'll just watch you waffle and duck the relevant issue . Warning : I am easily bored when faced with childish rubbish ![]() |
|
By:
I thought weatherspoons were a good group.
. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcktvWFxtzQ |
|
By:
osmond and porky are classic distractors - why they defend the perps in this and the rest of the horrific organised gangs is beyond me.
but then this is how 'progressives' operate they do not want you to look at the issue of gang related exploitation of young girls by specific groups these groups must be so grateful for people like those two who try to muddy the issue |
|
By:
clearly by slinging mud at robinson they do not support the exposure of these groups and their methods
they certainly are not on the side thousands of young girls who have been harmed by these gangs |
|
By:
Moysey, show me one example of me defending the perps. Go on, just one. Promise I won't report the slander if you do.
|
|
By:
Listen to the wrong people and you would be led to believe that Tommy Robinson is a free speech warrior and a political prisoner, who’s only crime is exposing establishment lies.
The truth, however, is completely different. Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, has committed multiple offences with absolutely none of them having anything to with being a free speech martyr. Assault In 2005, Robinson was jailed for 12 months for assault occasioning actual bodily harm, for which he was sentenced to 12 months’ imprisonment, and assault with intent to resist arrest, for which he received a concurrent term of three months. Assaulting a police officer In 2010, Robinson was charged with assaulting a police officer during clashes at a poppy burning protest. After the fighting, a police officer was taken to hospital after trying to intervene in a 50 man brawl. Rooftop protest In 2011, Robinson and EDL co-founder Kevin Carroll flew to Zurich to protest on the roof of a FIFA building that England were not allowed to wear poppies on their kit because of FIFA’s political symbol ban. They were fined £3,000 for their troubles. Assault at his own rally In 2011, Robinson was convicted of assault for an attack at an EDL march in Blackburn. After he was goaded for being a government and police informant Robinson launched into a verbal tirade against those protesting against him. Robinson then proceeded to headbutt one of the march goers. Luton football riot In July 2011, Robinson was found guilty of leading a brawl that included 100 Luton Town football fans into a fight with Newport County fans. Fans were heard chanting ‘EDL till I die.’ For the crime committed, he was given a suspended 12-month prison sentence and banned from Luton football matches for 3 years. Using someone else’s passport In January 2013 Robinson was jailed for 10 months for travelling to the USA on his friend’s passport. Robinson admitted the charge of possession of a false identity document with improper intention. The passport Robinson used was under the name of Andrew McMaster. He checked himself in on the way out from Heathrow airport however when he arrived in the USA customs officials took his fingerprints and realised he was using a passport that was not his own. Mortgage fraud In 2014, Tommy Robinson was sentenced to prison for 18 months for committing mortgage fraud with the crime dating back to 2009. After pleading guilty in November 2013 to committing £160,000 worth of mortgage fraud Robinson was sentenced at St Albans Crown Court. Whilst passing the sentence, the judge told Robinson: ‘This was an operation which was fraudulent from the outset and involved a significant amount of forward planning.’ “I am satisfied you took part in a thoroughly dishonest course of conduct,’ he told him. Contempt of court 1 In 2017, Robinson was given a 3 month suspended sentence after he admitted a contempt of court charge for attempting to photograph juvenile defendant in a court case whilst having no right to do so. Court security had told Robinson not to film in and around the court as it would lead to his arrest. The 3 month suspended sentence could be activated within 18 months. Contempt of court 2 Finally, earlier this year, the crucial case that led to Robinson being jailed and sparked the ridiculous Free Tommy protests. Robinson is currently serving a 13-month sentence for contempt of court. Robinson was arrested after Facebook live streaming outside Leeds Crown Court for an hour despite their being reporting restrictions on the case. Because he had a suspended sentence for the same crime the judge sentenced Robinson to 13 months in prison. Robinson pled guilty. |
|
By:
I find it funny that the left are obsessed with a criminal history, dont you feel a little pathetic when you post your crap ?
Are the left saying anyone with a criminal record is not worthy of anything ? The left know TR has a point but the left are sticking to their scripted posts. |
|
By:
the point is that given he has proven how dishonest he's been in the past and willingness to break the law, why should we believe a word he says now especially as this is basically his career isn't it, he sells books and it was a bestseller, is paid to be interviewed by broadcasters, was paid by rebel media, he was paid/sent tens of thousands in bitcoin payments since he was recently sent to prison, receieved 10's of thousands more via crowdfunding and has donation option on his own website.
Being Anti Muslim is a nice money earner for him, and he's riding this train for as long as it lasts. |
|
By:
Hello from Scotland.
There are plenty of proper people up here. ALWAYS |
|
By:
they are only interested in slagging robinson off to take away the attention from what he is saying about white girls being groomed by muslim gangs
by doing this those who do that are actually siding with these groups by trying to cloud the issues you will not see them coming out and condemning these organised groups and asking why it appears just one cultural group seem to be mainly responsible the other active one is the albanian importers - very interesting there too but essentially porky osmond and scandanavian are doing this by not coming out and declaring the repugnance and supporting those who have been exposing - but spending time denegrating those who do the exposing, examining, investigating, they are in fact supporting groups who are exploiting these white girls just like the senior copper in telford who tried to play down 40 years of it (not all muslim there by the way) it is too dirty a subject for the elite and their supporters to touch it is too dirty a subject for the tv news/investigations to examine we cannot have the personalised news media programmes like the kay burley show etc etc getting into it far too nasty and messy - lets do the royal family continually instead |
|
By:
just a silly post tbh, anyone caught doing the things the asian gang have done should be lifers, I've said that before because it's the worst of the worst crime, but to think TR is doing this out of the goodness of his heart with no interest in using his supporters like you as cash cows is far fetched to say the least.
|
|
By:
scandanavian_haven • October 26, 2018 11:08 PM BST
was paid by rebel media He worked as a journalist for Rebel Media , for which he was paid . I cannot for the life of me understand why being paid to work should be used as a stick with which to beat someone ![]() Why you include this as evidence of his dishonesty is totally baffling . Are you suggesting that being paid for work undertaken is a measure of ones dishonesty ? Oh , and he wrote a bestselling book . WOW ! What it is , in fact , is an example as to the lengths that his detractors go to in an attempt to dismiss him and his views . You actually make Sky News and the BBC look like balanced , unbiased broadcasters . Quite a feat ![]() ( I can't believe I even wasted time responding to such garbage ) |
|
By:
what are you even talking about, I was highlighting the number of differnt ways he is paid to be anti muslim, given that I was saying he's making a career out of being anti muslim, then listed all the different ways he's paid to promote anti muslim rhetoric, rebel media being one, shouldn't come as a shock that was relevant. He was not journalist for them covering the motorway accidents or the weather.
|
|
By:
speaking about imbalance, you're not even on the same page, taking one thing out of context and presenting it as another.
All those different streams of income are all based around being anti muslim, he is using the topic to make himself wealthy, it's simple enough stuff to follow. |
|
By:
Ok
|
|
By:
the lunatics have taken over the asylum,but some of us have escaped the asylum before it was taken over
let battle commence world war 3 would be nice oops has it already begun and we dont realise we are in one lets look at the facts in world war 2 estimates are about 20 million dead since end of that and only counting armed conflicts around the world be that civil war or national wars is already past that |
|
By:
"The War to End all Wars" , a famous quote but I'm not sure whose words they were .
|
|
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
26 Oct 18 17:03 Joined: 03 Dec 15 | Topic/replies: 6,229 | Blogger: PorcupineorPineapple's blog My view is that Mr Robinsons incarceration was unjust and almost certainly politically motivated - You disagree ? I disagree it was both to be honest. Sentences are always open to interpretation but to call it unjust is wrong imo. Politically motivated also no. He was prejudicing a very important case. If he hadn't been stopped those men could have called a mistrial and the victims would have had to give testimony again. Mr Robinson , along with a number of others , is concerned that there is a disproportionate threat to vulnerable young girls posed by pakistani muslim men . You are not ? I've yet to see evidence of anything except him solely focusing on muslims and asians and turning a blind eye to everyone else. When he starts turning up outside court to highlight white, British paedophiles then, maybe, I'd start taking him more seriously. I'd take this "concern" more seriously if it wasn't such an obvious deliberate career path. ^ Do you find it unacceptable for anyone/group to be a primarily a single issue activist? e.g. Do you condemn Shelter UK for mainly speaking about housing? Do you condemn Femi Oluwole and Gina Miller for mainly speaking about Brexit? Do you condemn Stonewall for mainly speaking about trans rights? Do you condemn Breast Cancer awareness campaign for mainly speaking about breast cancer awareness? Do you condemn the fast food rights campaign for mainly speaking about fast food workers rights? |
|
By:
Don't be so pathetic.
If Shelter were only worried about white British people being homeless then I'd condemn them. If Gina Miller was only concerned about how Brexit affected white British people then I'd condemn her. If Stonewall weren't bothered about Muslim, Jewish or other trans people then I'd condemn them. etc et bloody cetera Hope that's clear enough. |
|
By:
Gina Millar is only concerned with overturning the democratic vote of the majority of the people to get her way
That’s her single issue , do you think that’s right ? |
|
By:
Hope that's clear enough.
Yes , perfectly . Thanks for the clarification ![]() |
|
By:
We could look at the others as well if you wish pineapple
|
|
By:
I think it's neither right nor wrong. I think that's your biased interpretation of it. That's all.
|
|
By:
Millers single issue , what about that ?
|
|
By:
You see I think you’ve got a biased and wrong interpretation of TR , and I think you are even more wrong in the case of Gina millar
How about that ? |
|
By:
Do you think Millars in it for the money ?
|
|
By:
lfc - I think if I took a blind tactic of simply opposing everything you said or believed I'd probably do ok. So you disagreeing with me here is something I'm very comfortable with.
|