Is this due to confusion caused by claimants having multiple spouses ? Don't think the computer was set up with this in mind .
Tick one of the following :- Marital Status , a) single b) married c) divorced d) separated e) widowed
The new form has the above but underneath is a box ...... if b) please state number of spouses in box provided .
Is this due to confusion caused by claimants having multiple spouses ? Don't think the computer was set up with this in mind . Tick one of the following :-Marital Status ,a) singleb) marriedc) divorcedd) separatede) widowedThe new form has the above
Reynard 18 Oct 18 00:14 The new form has the above but underneath is a box ...... if b) please state number of spouses in box provided .
This is the UK, only one spouse allowed. Why bother changing forms to ask this? Is it a way of getting bigamists to admit a crime or are we pandering to outsiders again?
Reynard 18 Oct 18 00:14 The new form has the above but underneath is a box ...... if b) please state number of spouses in box provided .This is the UK, only one spouse allowed. Why bother changing forms to ask this? Is it a way of getting bigamis
It's not "the tories" who **cked up it'll be civil servants or IT developers. I don't think May or Gove were doing the relevant processing. HTH.
There should be a couple new Monopoly cards. "Government IT Scheme screwed up in your favour, collect £5000." "You say something innocent and someone on the internet takes offence. Convicted of a hate crime. Go directly to jail." "You are of a minority group the police are scared to touch. Get out of jail free and an entry ticket to York railway museum."
It's not "the tories" who **cked up it'll be civil servants or IT developers. I don't think May or Gove were doing the relevant processing. HTH.There should be a couple new Monopoly cards."Government IT Scheme screwed up in your favour, collect £500
You are trying too hard to look 'right on' jamesdean. No one on this thread has blamed anyone but government. Cherry picking part of my sentence does not change that. Are you still trying to make up for your own racist attack in pikeys by virtue signalling?
You are trying too hard to look 'right on' jamesdean. No one on this thread has blamed anyone but government. Cherry picking part of my sentence does not change that. Are you still trying to make up for your own racist attack in pikeys by virtue sign
Not by asking how many wives a man has, no. By asking if we are pandering to 'outsiders'
This after the DWP (under the governments rules) have already admitted it was their mistake. It's absolutely pathetic!
#iblametheyislamists
Not by asking how many wives a man has, no. By asking if we are pandering to 'outsiders'This after the DWP (under the governments rules) have already admitted it was their mistake. It's absolutely pathetic!#iblametheyislamists
No, saddo. The Government/DWP made a mistake with payments and owned up to it. Nout to do with any 'outsiders' Cannot blame them this time I'm afraid
or are we pandering to outsiders again? No, saddo. The Government/DWP made a mistake with payments and owned up to it. Nout to do with any 'outsiders'Cannot blame them this time I'm afraid
No, Saddo. You are beginning to realise that it is you that's looking silly after trying to blame those pesky 'outsiders' for something that had nothing to do with them. Obviously dawning on you how pathetic the blaming is. Good luck...
No, Saddo. You are beginning to realise that it is you that's looking silly after trying to blamethose pesky 'outsiders' for something that had nothing to do with them. Obviously dawning on you how patheticthe blaming is. Good luck...