Two questions about the Kavanaugh case.

There is talk on the American forums that one accuser was a hoax by some 4chan user and his girlfriend. If true Michael Avenatti, the lawyer who made the allegations public and sent them to the senate judiciary committee, could find himself in a spot of bother.

Kavanaugh appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee under penalty of a felony, an offence which carries a five-year prison sentence. He vehemently denied all allegations.

On the accusers' side, short of an unimpeachable alibi from Kavanaugh that placed him somewhere else at the time, their claims would seem impossible to either prove or disprove. A 'he said, she said' scenario as Tobermory pointed out. The latest woman to come forward claims she was gang-raped, not by Kavanaugh but at a party where he was present.

In an attempt to answer the original question: If it transpires that Kavanaugh is entirely innocent, the women making false allegations purely to serve a political agenda, I think they should face a similar punishment. Five years imprisonment.

1) Kavanaugh is not on trial so talk of imprisonment is bs.

2) if Republican men don't think it matters, then how come they were so keen to impeach Clinton over a ****?

Now if you make false allegations of this nature that could ruin someone’s life , and their family’s and children

Then that deserves a substantial prison sentence

1) Kavanaugh is not on trial. You could think of it as a job interview if you like.
2) Was Clinton getting his willy sucked a crime? Or double standards from the GOP senators?

Come out of the alt-right loop for a while and notice that Kavanaugh was not even on President Trump's original list of candidates for the Supreme Court. Oh, and he is still not on trial.

Kavanaugh is 1/4 to be confirmed, and 12/5 not to be confirmed.

Bill Clinton was not impeached.

Impeachment doesn't necessarily mean a president is removed from office; it's only a formal statement of charges.

You're right, found this :

Bill Clinton was indeed impeached by the House of Representatives, but the senate did not come to the necessary 2/3 majority agreement to fully process it, so he was acquitted.
Initially, four impeachment articles were brought against president Clinton: two perjury charges, one charge of abuse of power and one of obstruction of justice. Only the one perjury impeachment article and that of obstruction of justice passed, and he had to stand trial in front of the Senate on these two charges. This made him only the second U.S. president after Andrew Johnson (in 1868) to be impeached.

Not a single Democrat voted against Clinton during those proceedings.

I've had cause to follow the careers of Bill and Hillary Clinton since his second term as Governor of Arkansas. I consider them both to be the most corrupt politicians seen during my lifetime.

Donald Trump wouldn't have been my first choice as POTUS, but considering the alternative I'll be forever grateful to the man that he won. And, as it has transpired, he is doing a very good job despite the misguided efforts of others to derail his presidency at any cost.

Leopard flat out wrong again. "Clinton wasn't impeached"

Chalk it up alongside all the other wrong statements, predictions etc. "Trump will never win the nomination" "Trump will never become president" "Trump won't make it to inauguration" "Trump won't last a month" "Trump won't last three months" "Trump won't last a year"

And now "Clinton wasn't impeached"

leopard - 'the war will be over by christmas'  ho ho ho

I’ve just read a very long article which does an excellent job of demonstrating that Brett Kavanaugh was lying in his hearing and that Dr Ford’s claims have actually been buoyed by him, in part to his own calendar.

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying