|
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves • September 26, 2018 7:07 PM BST
I hit dave1357's link for full info and got 404 - The webpage you are requesting does not exist on the site dave1357 • September 26, 2018 3:50 PM BST .... cut and paste these links or they might not work |
|
By:
Ta, dave. Cut & paste works. Can't find any breakdown by ethnicity or skin colour though.
According to the link, life expectancy for Scotland has always trailed the other three countries, with England having the longest life expectancy. Which would suggest that access to high-angle sunlight in the south of England, and consequent vitamin D formation, might be crucial to a longer life. And that there'll be a pullback in life expectancy in the overall population as an increasing number come to have dark skins (which evolved to protect against intense tropical sunlight), rather than pale skins (which evolved to absorb the weak sunlight at UK latitudes). |
|
By:
Can only see Life Expectancy At Birth
|
|
By:
I read last night that dark skinned people need 10 times the exposure to the sun in order to get the same amount of vitamin D as light skinned people.
|
|
By:
Jack Hacksaw • September 26, 2018 9:29 PM BST
Can only see Life Expectancy At Birth The national life tables are “period” life tables and all figures referred to in this bulletin are “period” life expectancies. Period life expectancy is the average number of additional years a person would live if he or she experienced the age-specific mortality rates of the given area and time period for the rest of their life. So the tables apply to any age not just at birth. |
|
By:
Was there not a bad flu epidemic killing loads of people last winter, hospitals overflowing with very ill people, followed by a very hot summer that also increases mortality, and life span drops statistically by a week I think they aid, and the media as usual go into meltdown?
|
|
By:
I wouldv'e thought heavy smokers and drinkers people in their 70s would be keeing the figures down as they are probably the last generation of a specific group with that lifestyle..In 20 years time surely luing cancwers and smoking related cancers will be very low % probably smoking in the next 25 years will be virtually non exiostent and drtinking habits are improving as well..
|
|
By:
Brain cancers and other slow growers will increase dramatically especially in the young (under 25) as will all auto immune illnesses which are already on the rise mostly due to the techy environment we've been poisoned with,agree nobody's somoking and less drinking but our environment will more than make up for that.
|
|
By:
Cheers Dave
|
|
By:
Some have argued that industry used to account for high numbers of premature deaths. Perhaps healthier working conditions which were a long time in coming helped boost longevity and that effect has now run its course.
|
|
By:
Im sure the sh1t they sprey on us from the skies here on the south coast nearly every day is good for our health,and they do a lovely job in trying to block at the sun rays bless em
|
|
By:
Jack Hacksaw • September 26, 2018 9:29 PM BST
Can only see Life Expectancy At Birth The national life tables are “period” life tables and all figures referred to in this bulletin are “period” life expectancies. Period life expectancy is the average number of additional years a person would live if he or she experienced the age-specific mortality rates of the given area and time period for the rest of their life. So the tables apply to any age not just at birth. So, a man on his 60th birthday can expect to live another 19.2 years. And a boy on his 5th birthday can expect to live another 74.2 years. How much longer can a man celebrating his 85th birthday expect to live for? ![]() |
|
By:
6 years
|
|
By:
All of these estimates are merely guesswork and poor and dishonest statistics
Usually using one of two methods , one method uses what happened in the past to arrive at an estimate ( where they use wrong maths ) And the other method uses a combination of the past ( with wrong maths ) and the future ( guesswork ) Then the government or some other body will give you the findings , part fact , part misunderstood or ignored facts , and partly outright lies That’s all you need to know |
|
By:
lfc moving into terry mccann mode
|
|
By:
dave that is hiw it has been in the past , certainly with the government statistics ( on anything )
and in the vast majority of books etc They have all been wrong , something may have changed I suppose Anythings possible |
|
By:
There has never been a study done that shows the true life expectancy of people in Britain , never
|
|
By:
You se all these studies are fundamentally flawed in the manner in which they collect data
And when there are flaws of this nature they will be manipulated by the governments and others There is only one way to get the true figure , but that not practical |
|
By:
One will have fundamental flaws in one way , the other method has fundamental flaws in a different way
|
|
By:
That’s good god the government , they can tell you any old sh1te
The system allows it |
|
By:
When it comes to longevity they have been doing that for at least 200 years
|
|
By:
The only true way to do it would be for everyone born in say 1920 , wait until they have all died
Then you know the true life exectency that group of people just them , no one else ( don’t forget wars etc ) And the same for 1940 , wait until they are all dead And 1970 , etc There is no other way of doing it , they don’t do that |
|
By:
Dave--CHEMTRAILS, see what the millions of LOONS are saying on the net, cant all be wrong can they?
![]() |
|
By:
sigh - they are wrong terry. Half the population (including you) are below average intelligence.
|
|
By:
^And the other half as well who only think they're intelligent.
|
|
By:
Daves just a troll,saucy bastard really
|