Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 794 comments are related to the topic:
9/11 seventeen years on
9/11 seventeen years on
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 794
|
By:
so you watched a 2hr doc in 10 mins well done, you haven't watched and never will,shame as you could have seen what really happened to the second tower,you"ll never guess!
|
|
By:
I’ve watched bits and pieces here and there , may not have seen this
what does it say happened ? ( don’t mention dustification I don’t believe that ) |
|
By:
It’s a bit rude to say watch a 2 hr doc , what did it say just one or two facts
hope you have watched it terry and not telling fibs ! |
|
By:
Fibs! Don't know what you mean, a perfect example of a closed mind, he asks for evidence and then cant be ar$ed to watch,couldnt make it up
|
|
By:
The building ,steel stacked in columns with little bits of welding , substandard concrete mixed with sand
remember the space shuttle lightweight foam damaged the wing It’s momentum caused by speed , the wtc planes hit a matchstick building at very high speed with the fuel etc These are the things we can understand ,these are the kind of things that make sense imo |
|
By:
It's pretty pathetic to say 'show me the evidence' of the 9/11 tragedies. Go look for yourself - there's more than enough evidence to blow the 'offical line' out of the water.
Only a fool would believe the offical line if you bothered to take some time to view evidence. Mexico is on a windup. He is knitpicking the wordings of Terry McCann, but not answering the major points Terry made. It's all out there if you look. |
|
By:
still no evidence from terry you notice
and he chaims to have watched the doc , hmmm I suppose anythings possible |
|
By:
nothing from black rock either
Go ahead ... |
|
By:
I have no idea what blsckrock believes happened
Let’s see |
|
By:
Evidence please , just one little FACT , is that too much to ask ?
|
|
By:
Blackrock,ive just come to the conclusion the poor sod is mental,a dodgepot
 |
|
By:
Why don't you find time to view some documentaries and come back with a more informed opinion. Why concern yourself with what i believe?
|
|
By:
That’s neither here nor there , any facts ?
go ahead , so far not even one from dyno or blackrock or terry not one so far of course , go ahead ,.. |
|
By:
I have watched many documentaries and read a lot ,
I believe the official story pretty well Now if h have missed any evidence that’s ok What is it ? |
|
By:
Why are you so quiet ?
|
|
By:
Because we cant believe what we are reading that's why,Geez you are something else mush
|
|
By:
nothing of any consequence from terry there you might notice
|
|
By:
maybe blackrock can do better , no idea what he believes
nevertheless he has no evidence so far ... |
|
By:
This is very simple,you asked for evidence,i tell you where to find it,you don't look and then demand evidence, your fooking mad!!!
|
|
By:
might have to look later , please no make believe fairy tales or fantasy or supernatural theories
Facts if you have any , I like facts , I’m like that Let’s see .... |
|
By:
As a hatter
 |
|
By:
Take your pick :
The problem is im not sure if there are versions offered in Braille for those who are hard of hearing !!! As stated earlier the evidence is such that it is no longer in question that the official tale of two planes is a complete red herring, I still find it totally bewildering how the Psy Op put in place b4 during and after has managed to keep the event as per the original findings. Quite staggering !! I am almost tempted to say that was even a bigger job than the stage managing of the bringing down of WTC buildings 1 2 3 4 5 6 AND 7. Again most do not even realise that as the case. NINE ELEVEN TWO THOUSAND & ONE. As we approach the 17th Anniversary of that most tragic of days, I decided to open up a thread and leave a couple of links which may be useful to anyone who wants to revisit the event and to consider some relatively new ( and some not so new but hidden from mainstream media ) information which casts an enormous shadow over the official narrative which is still,almost unbelievably, in the history books. I wonder what the modern day history classes of the latest generation are being taught by their tutors in respect of the vanishing WTC towers ??? I am not going to offer my own opinion as it matters not and will give added reason for trolls to descend upon the thread although i expect the " keyboard experts with no evidence to back up their spurious input " will arrive any time soon. i will simply list links which i found informative and helpful which I invite you to view objectively and run your own chain of thought through the presentations. Here is the link for a recent documentary/ Investigation carried out by a young guy called Chris Hampton. In respect of copyright infringement his original presentation was taken down by Youtube but as i type the updated version is still available. 911 ALCHEMY = FACING REALITY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Zz04_-f0GE This is also available to view on his own website WOLF CLAN MEDIA This presentation predominantly deals with the four reported plane crashes in relation to the 911 attack and is approximately 3 hours in duration. It is compulsive viewing. I would also recommend you consider viewing the following. IRREFUTABLE - 911 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgyWhdSe0Yc Evidence based documentary regarding the WTC towers. In addition . CHECKtheEVIDENCE.COM is a comprehensive research hub which has many points of interest. http://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/ RICHPLANET.TV has various interviews contained on his platform which are enlightening https://www.richplanet.net/ 9/11 TRILLIONS : FOLLOW THE MONEY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3xgjxJwedA Interesting analysis from James Corbett who covers the events leading up the attack. Corbett has also produced documentaries covering potential suspects for the crime which are well worth looking up. There are 3 books which are well worth reading, FINDING THE TRUTH and HOLDING THE TRUTH both written by Andrew Johnson and available as FOC PDF downloads from his website Checktheevidence.com Last but not least probably the most informative book ever written about the subject WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO ? written by Dr Judy Wood. There is a fabulous array of information documented above and early this coming week the racing is extremely poor. Take a day off, keep an open mind and consider the evidence. Frankly I am not sure if there is anything the common man can do in order to stand up against this type of perpetrator but being armed with the knowledge presented may help. There are some pretty determined truth seeking baton carriers listed above who have pure and simply put their lives on the line over this and is some cases ruined their careers in the name of the justice. Thank you for reading. |
|
By:
I would like to think you may not here from somebody posting on here for a few weeks as he attempts to digest the many avenues of evidence he has been given to work through.
Being a gambling man i would wager its probably 1-20 that he ignores the opportunity to investigate through the platforms offered and more like 1-100 that even if he did he would still not get it. |
|
By:
With that my work is now complete.
Good luck arguing about matters which already have been scientifically researched and proved over many years yet which the extreme power of the perpetrators somehow manage to keep suppressed and hidden, The mind boggles at that power |
|
By:
Is there ONE picture of a passenger aircraft hitting the Pentagon or ONE crash landing in a field?
No. https://youtu.be/IxDjOobmC8M - 4 minute film of the crater 'where Flight 93 crashed'. There's nothing there but a hole in the ground. |
|
By:
Blast expert Allyn Kilsheimer was first on the scene at the pentagon ,
“ I saw the marks of the plane on the face of the building , I picked up the parts of the plane with the airline markings on them . I held in my hand the tail section of the plane and found the black box ( his account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building ) I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands , including body parts , okay ? “ |
|
By:
Well NO, "PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH" say he is lying, now he is President of the company,drrrr wonder why!
|
|
By:
Terry, there is evidence within the advised viewing production which show that the plane he refers to didnt ever leave the ground !!!!
As i said the layers of deception run so deep that unless you are willing to keep an open mind you will fall into the psy op trap they so cleverly set and which quite remarkably are still dragging the gullible into the labyrinth of lies. |
|
By:
you can tell me it was piloted by Father Christmas and is now somewhere in Lapland
sorry I’m not going to believe that either |
|
By:
I held in my hand the tail section of the plane
lfc - is this bloke you refer to none other than Geoffrey Capes?? |
|
By:
As Nixon said "If its shown on tv the public will believe it" how right he was
|
|
By:
So apart from
Eyewitnesses, video of crash, recovered flight recorders , radar, phone calls from victims, confessions from hijackers, wreckage, body parts/DNA, damaged buildings , victims never being seen again, passenger lists, claimed responsibility of the crime, (anything else) There is no evidence to back up the official version of events. BUT the "it was a fake" evidence is overwhelming- it consists of a 2 hour loon-tube video and a couple of books. so did the 4 planes crash? Ummm what does the evidence suggest? |
|
By:
You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink it ¿¿¿
|
|
By:
The video evidence suggests a plane did not crash land in a field. And the absence of any photos being released suggests that there was no plane on the Pentagon lawn.
|
|
By:
Injera,
Perhaps you should look at all the evidence rather than picking the odd bit . Bodies, black boxes, phone calls , radar , eyewitnesses, missing people may suggest a plane did crash in a field. Is it possible that your interpretation of this "video evidence " is not 100% reliable. |
|
By:
Mexico you will have to understand where injera is coming from , he is not being quite candid about this
he has read something from a Christian fundamentalist point of view , possibly a preacher or a book That is his angle , when you understand that you understand it’s pointless trying to reason with him , that’s where he is at ...although I don’t think he has been truthful enough to say so |
|
By:
https://youtu.be/IxDjOobmC8M
Mexico - eye witnesses said they saw NO plane. The video tells me there was NO plane. You find me a photo of Flight 93 in that field and I will believe the official verdict. As for bodies - none were recovered in Shanksville. If you think any were recovered at the Pentagon please post the links. This is what the coroner said regarding his visit to Shanksville: In the 12 months following 9/11, Miller in fact described the surprising lack of human remains at the Flight 93 crash site, repeatedly and unequivocally: He told author David McCall: “I got to the actual crash site and could not believe what I saw. … Usually you see much debris, wreckage, and much noise and commotion. This crash was different. There was no wreckage, no bodies, and no noise. … It appeared as though there were no passengers or crew on this plane.” (David McCall, From Tragedy to Triumph, 2002, pp. 86-87) Recalling the crash scene, Miller told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review: “This is the most eerie thing. I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop.” (Robb Frederick, “The day that changed America,” Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 9/11/2002) |
|
By:
There were dozens of eyewitnesses who saw the plane
And only 5 individuals for whom no remains could be found at the pentagon |
|
By:
64 were burned st Arlington , others at private ceremonies
5 no remains found , including Dana Falkenberg aged 3 |
|
By:
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/10/us/10shanksville.html
This story suggests human remains were recovered (about 8%) and everyone on board was identified. There were phone calls, missing passengers (matching flight records), black boxes recovered, wreckage recovered, radar evidence, an organisation claimed responsibility. On top of this the "truthers" don't bother to tell the world what actually happened. These loons never bother to present any evidence to show the world what happened . |