The important point is that buckled columns can be reduced in strength so much that they might as well not be there

Terry

Is that total BS.

The annual budget of all US military is under a trillion dollars- but you claim there were a few trillion stolen on 10thSept 2001.

Without any evidence.

BTW Terry - you have not explained your racist comments about EDF & Rothchild.

So sorry but im sure Donald Rumsfeld told the world about the money vanishing,i guess he made it all up then

no evidence from scand either for what happened you will notice

sh implied that Silverstein said that explosives were used
That’s not true

Oh he did say it mex you old tease, Donald Rumsfeld I just seen him admit trillions have vanished from the pentagon, so theres your proof,its no secret, so into whos off shore accounts did it go into??

Hardly an admission Terry.

OMFG ! Team 1971 Mexico .....They cannot read. They cannot write and they cannot come to terms with being completely wrong !

I have provided them the links to find out for themselves what happened. These pockets of information have been garnered together through in an excess of a  decade of proper scientific study and investigation and yet they cannot fit in the time through their untold posts to consider them ????? GO FIGURE !!!

I will for a third time post the links and ask them to at least have a look. The ebooks are free to download and although the hard back book WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO is probably way out of their price range I feel it is an essential read for anyone who wants to pass comment on that tragic world changing event.

CHECKtheEVIDENCE.COM is a comprehensive research hub which has many points of interest.

http://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/

RICHPLANET.TV has various interviews contained on his platform which are enlightening

https://www.richplanet.net/

9/11 TRILLIONS : FOLLOW THE MONEY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3xgjxJwedA

Interesting analysis from James Corbett who covers the events leading up the attack.

Corbett has also produced documentaries covering potential suspects for the crime which are well worth looking up.

There are 3 books which are well worth reading,

FINDING THE TRUTH and HOLDING THE TRUTH both written by Andrew Johnson and available as FOC PDF downloads from his website Checktheevidence.com

Last but not least probably the most informative book ever written about the subject

WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO ? written by Dr Judy Wood.


Regarding the planes .. http://mark-conlon.blogspot.com/

Here is the link for a recent documentary/ Investigation carried out by a young guy called Chris Hampton. In respect of copyright infringement his original presentation was taken down by Youtube but as i type the updated version is still available.

911 ALCHEMY = FACING REALITY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Zz04_-f0GE

I would also recommend you consider viewing the following.

IRREFUTABLE  - 911

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgyWhdSe0Yc

Evidence based documentary regarding the WTC towers.


The following 2 links are included because they highlight the lengths that are gone to in order to keep the suppression of information firmly under control. Sadly there are many others

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrTjPGy2k_U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o95Pr1pSNI

There is a fabulous array of information documented above  Take a day off, keep an open mind and consider the evidence.

Frankly I am not sure if there is anything the common man can do in order to stand up against this type of perpetrator but being armed with the knowledge presented may help. There are some pretty determined truth seeking baton carriers listed above who have pure and simply put their lives on the line over this and is some cases ruined their careers in the name of the justice.

So strong was the evidence uncovered by Dr Judy Wood she took " NIST " the DELEGATED official report producers to the the supreme court for an alleged science fraud.

DR. JUDY WOOD on behalf of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff/Relator,
vs.
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

Wood-Original
Filing
(FILED UNDER SEAL, April
25, 2007)        Wood-Order to
Unseal
(FILE UNSEALED, September
12, 2007)

       

Page 1        Page 1
In 2005, a number of reports were issued by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) which were meant to explain how the World Trade Centre towers were completely destroyed. The collective name for these reports was NCSTAR 1.

On 16 March 2007 under the guidance of attorney Jerry Leaphart, Dr. Judy Wood filed a “Request For Correction” (RFC). This proved that the main NIST WTC report (NCSTAR1) is/was “fraudulent and deceptive,” because it in no way accounts for the profound level of destruction of the WTC towers – as illustrated in a collection of over 65 photographs she presented then (a collection which has since been expanded on).

On 25 April 2007, Dr Wood filed a Qui Tam case against NIST’s NCSTAR contractors for science fraud – under the Data Quality Act (DQA).

Dr. Wood stated that “NIST cannot make a statement that the World Trade Center towers came down in ‘free fall’ on one hand”, and then say “that doing so is a form of collapse.” Wood also stated that “Use of the descriptive word ‘collapse’” is incorrect and Wood points out that according to NIST’s own data, their explanation of how the towers were “dustified” does not satisfy the laws of Physics. Dr. Wood, concludes from her study, that some type of Directed Energy Weapon was used to destroy most of the WTC buildings. Dr. Wood also points out that Applied Research Associates (ARA) were involved in the production of some aspects of the NCSTAR reports and that they are a manufacturer of Directed Energy Weapons and/or components of same. This therefore would be one example of where there was a “conflict of interest” in producing a truthful report.

Even though NIST was supposed to have responded to each RFC within 60 days, an “extension of review” notification was posted on 29th June 2007 for both Dr. Wood’s and Dr. Reynolds’ RFC’s. Then, in a letter dated 27 July 2007, Catherine Fletcher of NIST rejected Dr. Wood’s original RFC, stating: “NIST has examined the photographs you provided in conjunction with all the other evidence and has found that the evidence does not support a theory involving directed energy weapons.”

Fletcher also stated, “…ARA was determined not to have an organizational conflict of interest”. Finally Fletcher stated, “In conclusion, NIST is denying your request for correction because the NIST analysis of the initiation of the collapse of the WTC towers was thorough and based on all of the available evidence, and NIST continues to believe that the report is not fraudulent, deceptive or misleading.”

The Data Quality Act, however, includes a “right of appeal” against the decision and Dr. Wood then worked to further document a significant conflict of interest between ARA and some of the analyses NIST used in their reports. In the appeal, dated August 22nd 2007, Dr. Wood made 6 key assertions and stated that “NIST should have known that Applied Research Associates (ARA) is a ‘significant manufacturer of directed energy weapons and/or components thereof’” Additionally, Dr. Wood stated “NIST should have detected evidence of the use of such weaponry even in the context of NIST’s intentional and, I assert, improper limitation of its investigation into ‘the sequence of events leading up to the ‘collapse’ of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers.’”

The action charged that “defendants knowingly concealed, or failed to disclose, or caused others to fail to disclose material information” and that the reports produced “intentionally did not satisfy, the mandate that NIST had, which was that of determining what caused the destruction of WTC 1 and 2.”

It also charged that NIST’s “documentation serves solely to mislead, obfuscate and provide a vehicle for the intended fraud; namely, that of steering NIST away from a consideration of what caused the destruction of WTC1,2; which, as elsewhere elaborated upon, was the use on 9/11/01 of exotic weaponry known as directed energy weapons.”

In June 2008, The judge dismissed both cases, and an additional one by Ed Haas, using a single document for all 3. It ruled on some technicalities, but also mentioned the Moon Landings and JFK. In July 2009, an appeal was dismissed in a hearing, but none of the evidence re DEW etc was mentioned in the ruling (ruling was essentially on a technicality). The judges also admitted in their ruling that they were ignoring changes in the law which should have made it harder to dismiss the case.

The case was filed with the US Supreme Court on 28 Oct 2009, but this court simply declined to hear the case (an option it always has).

You read about so many theories and opinions etc regarding what happened but how many of these " experts " have had the confidence in their own understanding to question the official findings in a supreme court ??

The answer is NO OTHER;

that is all you need to know.

I know how much research i carried out in trying to find the right path to follow. It certainly wasnt easy. So many layers of deception and red herrings it really was a minefield of untruths !

I would not even consider commenting unless i felt that the opportunity was there to assist others . I have no agenda and my opinion counts for zilch but sometimes you simply cannot just sit back and say nothing !!!

Terry ... Bill Cooper knew and that my friend is why they ultimately killed him

Foo !  more nonsense from dyno , and terry likes to run amock on all these threads the daft dandelion

^ there’s another ‘truther’ becoming angry when presented with the facts : )

lfc1971 09 Oct 18 12:40 Joined: 06 Nov 11 | Topic/replies: 27,621 | Blogger: lfc1971's blog
^ there’s another ‘truther’ becoming angry when presented with the facts : )


I would prefer to refer to myself as an evidence based researcher who does does get annoyed with blind stupidity but hey you carry on tilting the can and sitting on the bottle

the important point is this,  buckled columns can be reduced in strength so much that they might as well not be there

If you take the time to read the request for correction i posted earlier you will see how evasive the criminals are to pin down. They have almost every loop hole covered and if they cannot cover it they sidestep it on technicalities and can even get supreme courts to  ignore the law and suppress the case. It is an incredible tale of deception, criminality, corruption and murder on a scale which is without comparison outside of War.

And your point is ?

pipe down dyno , no one’s listening

What a dreadful post for those 3,000 plus murdered,"pipe down no one"s listening" W.A.L.C

L stands for lousy btw

or 'Operation Northwoods' I should say