Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 47 comments are related to the topic:
What's the point of banning chemical weapons ?
What's the point of banning chemical weapons ?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 47
|
By:
theres some fooking shoite spouted about redlines etc,syria has crossed this so called red line 37 times since this conflict started,more like a green for go line,so called chemical attacks in uk,syria and a supposedly serious journo asked the russian lady defence minister if it was RUDE of trump tp tweet his thoughts,she rightly scoffed and laughed at the question asking if the word rude is actually used in any context in the world today
|
|
By:
This isn't madness yet. Madness will be when a Syrian stabs someone saying Allah o Akbar on the london bridge and the whole country goes in mourning blaming a 1400 year old book and. It has happened before and will happen again.
|
|
By:
1st time... I can't give you a definitive reason why the UK's getting so excited by #37. I'd love to know myself.
Macron's used the red line reference before. Obama did too. I guess there comes a time where you can only use words, rhetoric and demand full investigations (with seemingly no positive outcome) so many times. As has already been mentioned, tho, you can then start looking into motives etc. etc. and start questioning the reasoning. I used the phrase "a line gets crossed" in my previous post simply because use of chemical weapons does provoke a different response from other States than boring old bullets do. Had 50 people in Douma been killed because of gunfire at the weekend, would the UK be batting an eyelid? |
|
By:
according to may and boris there were more people at risk of been killed in salisburys chemical attack than died in douma the weekend,but at no point was it even considered to attack the labs in the country where boris says 100% we no who and where these chemicals are been made and stockpiled,someone should ask boris why in the opinion of his government a Syrian life is worth more than someones life in the uk,and don't bother asking why after 12 months of lambasting trump we,re now hanging of his every word,after saying a lines bern crossed if trump decides against action for whatever reason will the uk go it alone after telling us all something must be done,of course not
|
|
By:
mad the lot of them and great distraction too. Let's go and support the 5 islamist groups and defeat assad. Then they can be given western democracy as we are right. It's sort of like we used to send christianity to africa etc. Teach the 'savages' our better ways - ho ho!! Wonder how that will turn out?
question for you - answers on a postcard who intially gave this stuff to dear old saddam? Who poisoned the kurds? Who used chems against Iraq? But where did it go to when he got rid of the stuff? and now WE complain about assad using it and are prepared NOW to risk war!! oh what a tangled web we weave |
|
By:
It's all simple. We want our ( US/Israel ) puppet in charge not the Russian/Iranian one.
|
|
By:
Correct howard. The US and UK have dictated the Middle East via foreign policy for many years. The last thing they want is Putin intefering.
Salisbury was a 9/11 type thing. Created an excuse to ramp up the war on Putin. |
|
By:
If you invent something and then ban it and get rid of it. You still have the technology to reproduce it, so again back to my original question
 |