Personally I have mixed feelings about the above legislation likely to be coming in soon.
Firstly greedy bookmakers opening up multiple shops in certain high streets with 4 FOBT’s in every shop bleeding people dry and would be good to see them suffer on that basis.
On the other hand we’ll see many job losses for beleaguered staff which cannot be a good thing. Add to that the notion that government officials seem to know what the people of this country should be spending their money on and how to spend it. Also how to spend leisure time and to outlaw gambling as they believe it to be wrong. Greyhound tracks being closed to facilitate more housing with these ventures rubber stamped by the powers that be. Next will be the ban on pubs as they don’t believe people should be drinking.
Another step towards a sterile existence by judgemental MP’s.
There was a thread opened earlier on this but I want to question some of your comments.
Add to that the notion that government officials seem to know what the people of this country should be spending their money on and how to spend it. The government is merely responding to pressure from the general public, safe gambling bodies and the like.
Also how to spend leisure time and to outlaw gambling as they believe it to be wrong. And your evidence is?
Greyhound tracks being closed to facilitate more housing with these ventures rubber stamped by the powers that be. Which tracks did the government close to facilitate this? Have known some to close because of a lack of business but not aware of any through compulsory purchase.
Next will be the ban on pubs as they don’t believe people should be drinking. I take it you were being funny here.
There was a thread opened earlier on this but I want to question some of your comments.Add to that the notion that government officials seem to know what the people of this country should be spending their money on and how to spend it. The government
They should never have allowed them in the first place. The spread of betting shops has been a blight on the landscape particularly in town centres. As for job losses, happens all the time ie: car industry, banking, docks, mining etc. Might help people to find something more rewarding. There's always a chance that bookies will become bookies again.
They should never have allowed them in the first place. The spread of betting shops has been a blight on the landscape particularly in town centres. As for job losses, happens all the time ie: car industry, banking, docks, mining etc. Might help peop
It won't cost the bookies a billion or anything like it! (though they will claim it to try to get their way) 2 reasons: 1, The big bookies have a huge online presence. 2, Machine punters will start betting over the counter.
The key is slowing it all down a bit and returning to a "betting opportunity" every 5 minutes or so and not every 30 seconds. Punters would soon get used to it once more.
It won't cost the bookies a billion or anything like it!(though they will claim it to try to get their way)2 reasons:1, The big bookies have a huge online presence.2, Machine punters will start betting over the counter.The key is slowing it all down
cant see machine players going over the counter/ different breed
cant see £2 either tho think £30 more realistic
this leak of news strange one - plant i say
cant see machine players going over the counter/ different breedcant see £2 either tho think £30 more realisticthis leak of news strange one - plant i say
I saw loads of punters (including me), capt f, stop betting OTC and play the machines gradually placing less and less bets because they were so hooked to the machine. The lack of excitement of the machine - through minimal stakes should make them revert to betting normally. They aren't a different breed, they're all gamblers. It's just that machines are SO quick and SO addictive.
I agree about the news leak though, it does seem strange.
I saw loads of punters (including me), capt f, stop betting OTC and play the machines gradually placing less and less bets because they were so hooked to the machine.The lack of excitement of the machine - through minimal stakes should make them reve
some Machines only - would not know diff between Frankle and Stockport County _ will go on line/scratch card or just go
the last group keep the shops going
The End is Neigh
i in the shops every day Studysome punters back OTC only - no changesome do OTC / Machines - switch to otcsome Machines only - would not know diff between Frankle and Stockport County _ will go on line/scratch card or just gothe last group keep the s
I've been a bookie for many years mate. Owning shops as well as running them for others. My 1st shop was one of the 1st to rent machines, before roulette was even developed, before we knew what they would do.
I'm well out of it now though.
But, I do speak (write) from knowledge, even having played the things myself and seeing loads of what I spoke about including ruined lives and worse. Old blokes exchanging their 10p L15 for their putting their savings in notes in the FOBTS then leaving without putting a bet on. a 50p combination dog forecast (£3) out of a week's wages becoming the whole brown wages envelope contents being fed into the FOBTs
Same people - addicted and forgetting why they enjoyed popping to the betting shop.
The drop in bet numbers from maybe 250 a day in an average shop, midweek, to less than 100 was far too rapid for it too have been anything other than money transferring to FOBTs. On which profits the duty payable is 25% - which is why governments have been reluctant to get rid. Then there's the cost of renting them - which for small bookies is MUCH more than the big firms. I don't think the end is nigh.
However, I do believe that it will take a while for the return to the otc business. for the last 10-15 years it's been substitution, it won't change back overnight.
I would reckon that if you told all machine players the things were going to be banned, most of them would say "GOOD" and go back to written bets.
I've been a bookie for many years mate. Owning shops as well as running them for others.My 1st shop was one of the 1st to rent machines, before roulette was even developed, before we knew what they would do.I'm well out of it now though.But, I do spe
machine players mostly youngold guys like me dieing unfortyoung people not using cash now2 years ago i taking c £500 on football now less than £100 cash out etci been in own buisness 35 yearsnote you say you well out of it you are Correct M
Or, sod 'em, the greedy bookie firms have killed their own industry. It didn't need fixing, but SIS, HBLB, Jockey Club, and whoever got the chance all wanted just that little bit more from bookies, so all that was left is the big few.
Then the fobt owners came along. The things have helped no-one not the bookies, not the punters and not the poor sods whose lives have been ruined.
All true - A little re-education might help.Or, sod 'em, the greedy bookie firms have killed their own industry.It didn't need fixing, but SIS, HBLB, Jockey Club, and whoever got the chance all wanted just that little bit more from bookies, so all th
£2 my a r s e, can't happen as someone said it will be more like twenty, ALL the shops opened in the last ten years have been solely for the machines, they need to close the lot & stop this single manning that should cut down on the " loss of thousands of jobs "
£2 my a r s e, can't happen as someone said it will be more like twenty, ALL the shops opened in the last ten years have been solely for the machines, they need to close the lot & stop this single manning that should cut down on the " loss of thousa
I think the campaign (against the fobts) was really after £5, made a case for £16, but dreamed of £2, pumph. It would be so good for society if they were £2, not as good as a blanket ban. £20 wouldn't change very much of what's going on now.
A ban of the machines and closure of the Gambling Commission. It's all that's needed.
I think the campaign (against the fobts) was really after £5, made a case for £16, but dreamed of £2, pumph.It would be so good for society if they were £2, not as good as a blanket ban. £20 wouldn't change very much of what's going on now.A ban
I met the inventor of the 1st machines - soon after he developed them. An Austrian bloke, who joined forces with the one you're thinking of, who was running some west London shops. I've met him a few times too. He made MANY millions from them, he didn't develop the idea - he was in the right place, right time. He still works hard promoting the things as it happens.
I met the inventor of the 1st machines - soon after he developed them. An Austrian bloke, who joined forces with the one you're thinking of, who was running some west London shops. I've met him a few times too. He made MANY millions from them, he did
Sad fact is it will probably be twenty both sides will say its a huge step in the right direction bla bla bla, nothing will change sadly with that except a few more fights with people getting impatient over waiting too long to get on a machine
Sad fact is it will probably be twenty both sides will say its a huge step in the right direction bla bla bla, nothing will change sadly with that except a few more fights with people getting impatient over waiting too long to get on a machine