Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 62 comments are related to the topic:
The illusion of time.
The illusion of time.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 62
|
By:
Foinavon,sorry i got your name wrong,yes we may become famous when someone reads this thread.
 |
|
By:
You've got me there, Brass,
 I don't think of time as travelling, only passing. Perhaps you are onto something. Where is it travelling to?  There is a Universal speed limit, light happens to travel at that speed, no more no less. Einstein's laws show that we all travel through space-time at the universal speed limit, believe it or not. Has your mind been boggled enough for one evening? |
|
By:
You're not the only one to call me Fionavan, Brassy. I don't mind.
|
|
By:
here is out theory.TIME TRAVELS FASTER THAN EVERYTHING.IN OTHER WORDS ,THE TIME IT TAKES ANYTHING TO HAPPEN ,TIME WILL TRAVEL FASTER.and it will only travel one tiny second faster.
If a fork falls to the floor the time it takes for it to fall to the floor will be faster than the event itself. it the answer science has be looking for,what is faster than the speed of light,answer nothing. but we say" the TIME it takes for the speed of light to travel travels faster than the speed of light ITSELF" holy feck i think we have a theory  |
|
By:
Goodness me, Prof. Brian Cox will be flabbergasted when he reads this.
  |
|
By:
TIME IS EVERYWHERE.in the begining time was in the tiny pea that big banged ,when the big bang occured everything expanded out to create space,but time had to travel also,
but if the speed of light travelled out in front to the far reaches of the universe it have to have time to expand ,so time had to be faster or the speed of light could not expand . so the speed of time is faster than the speed of light. if albert is correct and the speed of light is faster(you can go back in time) but everyone says nothing travels faster than the speed of light,and thats where they are wrong.The FOINAVON/BRASSNECK theory says the speed of time is faster than the speed of light.(11th january 2018) science theory=something that is taken as fact until proven wrong. |
|
By:
You've worn me down, Brassy
 , my tiny brain can't take any more for now. |
|
By:
you are correct foinavon,i am not explaining it right,i will try again.
the TIME it takes for the speed of light to get from one place to the other is faster that the actual speed of light itself. now i have it. |
|
By:
IN OTHER WORDS if light is travelling from A TO B ,when the light arrives at B the time it took will be at B a nano second before the light arrives
because the speed of time it took is a nano second faster than the speed of light. reason.=no matter how fast the speed was for the light to get to B it had to have the time to do it. speed of time=speed of light +1(unit of the smallest space time ever recorded)nano second.(Foinavon/brassneck theory) |
|
By:
Time started when the second thing was created. Eg one cycle of the first thing equals two cycles of the second thing.
When there was only one thing, time wasnt measurable and didnt exist. |
|
By:
I suppose there is no such thing as physical time, it is only a construct of memory .
It is the same thing because you can't have memory without time It is from within us, part of being human that is what creates time , our memory |
|
By:
But then as please says you can't have anything physical without time , because physical things change , and that takes time
|
|
By:
Then if you have distance you must have time . The universe has to be big so as to stop us getting to the end of it
If it wasn't so big and it was possible to have enough time to walk to the end then we would be able to see what is at the end and we would know everything , and that can't be allowed I don't know why |
|
By:
Of course there is a short way and a long way to the end of the universe , if you travel up or down it is very much shorter than if you travel left or right
But even up or down is much too far |
|
By:
STOP
Hammer Time |
|
By:
There is a restaurant at the end of the Universe. I read it in a book.
|
|
By:
a thread with the two great betfair philosophers brass and lfc on it
|
|
By:
use lot haven't a klue. And I simply haven't got the time to explain
|
|
By:
the edge of the universe has to have light from the big bang because it is still expanding and the speed of light would have trapped well after the big bang and once out on front there was nothing going to catch it,but the new foinavon/brassneck theory proves that time(also a member of the big bang)would have trapped well also.
the speed of light on its big bang journey would have to go back in time if time was not out in front of it,proving that space time travels faster than the speed of light. remember there was nothing before the big bang so when the space expanded the time had to be on front of it otherwise the speed of lightin space would have nothing to expand into and would go back in time.So there you are guys ,SPACE TIME TRAVELS FASTER THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT. And it follows that if we human beings could harness the speed of time it would be possible to go back in time.So Albert was correct about that one,but foinavon /brass have now updated the big bang theory saying that space time travels faster than the speed of light.  |
|
By:
SO Albert was correct when he said everything happens together but he forgot to say anything can only happen when the time for it to happen is already there.
in other words nothing can happen unless there is time already there for it to happen. it is now time for me to end this thread. |
|
By:
And about time too, Albert will be spinning in his grave.
|
|
By:
Just read all this thread, that's 5 minutes of my time I'll never get back..
|
|
By:
but the big big question is "how can you make time so that it can be an advantage to you ?
|