We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
davies and bojo say we are making progress
are you just anti british going against them? |
|
By:
We need to agree to what sum they want and not dare question it.
If we dont the unelected man working for them will not say there is 'sufficient progress' to start the real talks. It should put anyone else off daring to leave. They might miss our 17% of EU GDP and massive net contribution to their failed project. |
|
By:
Amazing that the remainers are attacking the stalemate and blaming the UK negotiators.
What would make them happy? Maybe if we just lay down and let the EU walk all over us. Feck their calls for a breakaway payment. Lets see what's on offer first before agreeing the divorce payment. I would rather see us walking away rather than submit to their bullying and blackmail. |
|
By:
As an Australian, I find the EU asking for 80 billion because that's how much of future UK contributions they already budgetted to spend as bizzare. Really just blackmail. The UK should ask for it's net contributions back from the EU for the last 40 years.
|
|
By:
80 billion is the net amount we would pay in over 10 years after we leave had we stayed in!
The EU has a reduction in income. It needs to cut its cloth accordingly. |
|
By:
Usual brex**** I see.
The EU hasn't mentioned a monetary figure. The UK agreed to the format of the leaving negotiations. 1) What the liabilities of the UK are with the cost of these to be calculated later 2) What is the position of UK/EU citizens 3) Irish border issues. They keep saying that they can't do 1) until they know what the future trade deal is. That is quite obviously nonsense. The two are entirely separate issues. There might be an argument about 3) and future trade, but that isn't the blockage. The blockage is that the Tory party is split and can't conduct negotiations. |
|
By:
The blockage is that the EU negotiators are not interested in doing a meaningful deal .... it is exactly this sought of behaviour which led to the majority voting to leave.
Who wants to be ruled by Eurocrats when we can vote for the sort of government we want. When we joined there was no Euro and no talk of an ever expanding United States of Europe with its own army. |
|
By:
More nonsense. The EU negotiation guidelines were proposed and agreed by the 27 countries not by "eurocrats".
Why can't the UK agree what it owes or doesn't owe? It isn't difficult. If the negotiations were breaking down because the UK and the EU couldn't agree about that, fair enough. But they aren't. They are breaking down because the uk won't discuss what is owed unless trade talks start. |
|
By:
we are being held to blackmail
|
|
By:
Does anyone on here seriously expect our/other agenda driven 'news' agencies to report responsibly or even accurately on either side??
|
|
By:
dave1357 16 Oct 17 15:51 Joined: 05 Sep 10 | Topic/replies: 5,945 | Blogger: dave1357's blog Usual brex**** I see. The EU hasn't mentioned a monetary figure. The UK agreed to the format of the leaving negotiations. 1) What the liabilities of the UK are with the cost of these to be calculated later 2) What is the position of UK/EU citizens 3) Irish border issues. They keep saying that they can't do 1) until they know what the future trade deal is. That is quite obviously nonsense. The two are entirely separate issues. There might be an argument about 3) and future trade, but that isn't the blockage. The blockage is that the Tory party is split and can't conduct negotiations. Sufficient progress on the top 3 is required. It does not mean it has to be signed and sealed. The EU keep rejecting every offer we make because they dont want anyone else to leave their gang. |
|
By:
If the EU were on a rolling contract that expired and each session inside it was a new agreement then the UK could have just run down the agreement.
That isnt what is happening, the UK are breaking an agreement that they signed into, its expected that the party breacking 'contract' will get punished isnt it? |
|
By:
As a Irish citizen I can vouch that they won't stop till they get they're own way, We vetoed Maastricht they told us to vote again, we vetoed Nice they told us vote again.European Union killed Democracy imo....
|
|
By:
What is May even doing going there tonight??
They can come to us if they're bovvered. As for the 'divorce bill' (which has NO legal basis), give them a round pound coin and ask for change. |
|
By:
The "this is all caused by internal fights in the tory party" rubbish is pretty much a labour press release.
And the Labour party/Lib dem line that "no deal" can't be an option is a blank cheque for the EU to either scroo us, or make a deal so bad we try and stop Brexit. Labour probably don't care either way as long as it damages the Tories, which is what matters to the marxist a-holes on their front bench. |
|
By:
"The EU keep rejecting every offer we make because they dont want anyone else to leave their gang."
The only "offer" was Treeza saying that she would pay membership fees for two years if the EU let the UK stay in for another two years (while completely ignoring the actual negotiating framework). Davis hasn't provided the EU with any position papers on the UK's leaving bill. Davis is holding firm on not giving into EU demands over the money, and repeated his line from last week’s press conference that officials went through the EU’s financial demands “line by line” in order to get the best deal from taxpayers http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ david-davis-brexit-divorce-bill_uk_59aed637e4b0354e440ce5b5 The EU provided the papers that Davis went through line by line but has not responded with their own documents and continues to insist that future trade is linked to the leaving bill. Mr Davis admitted there was still "much work" to be done, but said there had been movement on divorce issues, including a "rigorous examination" of the financial settlement by UK officials. The Brexit Secretary also highlighted how some withdrawal issues were "dependent on discussions on our future relationship" http://news.sky.com/story/michel-barnier-says-no -brexit-progress-amid-very-disturbing-deadlock-11077391 Davies and Treeza are quite obviously taking the position that we aren't paying a leaving bill unless we get a trade deal. With Davies playing for time by not actually negotiating. That is the cause of the blockage. Now Treeza is going to Brussels tomorrow to beg the EU to change their mind. They won't and Treeza will be hit with a vote of no confidence in the House. Many of her own MP's will abstain. |
|
By:
"Davies and Treeza are quite obviously taking the position that we aren't paying a leaving bill unless we get a trade deal"
And WTF is wrong with that sensible position? What's the opposite, we give them money and DON'T get a trade deal? |
|
By:
lol Because Davies agreed to sort out the other issues before trade! That is why the negotiations are deadlocked. This isn't difficult stuff.
|
|
By:
What kind of idiot would pay if we dont get a decent deal when we pay nothing if we do no deal?
|
|
By:
it's worth pointing out that the EU is doing this because there are absolutely no visible signs that we are preparing for no deal.
there would need to be myriad projects going on in, which would be visible to all, for us to be ready to take that option. so our bluff, and it is just that, is being called and they are being obstructive because they know our threats are hollow. Bernier's job is to get the best possible deal for the EU and he is doing just that. May and Davies are hopeless while Jeremy Heywood probably doesn't even want brexit. |
|
By:
For instance what if we say fine here is a cheque for £50bn and the 3 million can stay under ECJ rules.
Then we move to trade and they so we pay £20bn a year and have to accept free movement of labour or there will be no trade deal. What happens then? |
|
By:
Dave if there is no deal we have to pay a zero 'divorce bill' unless we offer money just for the sake of it.
|
|
By:
For a start the "leaving bill" negotiations include discussions on obligations
There is no negotiation if we get nothing back in return. Why pay anything? |
|
By:
In all seriousness if we had the right people running the show we would start with a demand for £20BN and go from there.
Not a chance we owe them a penny. |
|
By:
get some tomato seeds for christmas
|
|
By:
If we agreed that "big figure plucked out of the sky" is due, then we have to pay the figure. Why would you think there is any connection to winding up the finances of EU membership and future arrangements? This is why Treeza's intervention was idiotic. She just said we'll give you £40bn for a transition period and the EU basically said fine we'll have that but first let's sort out the leaving bill, "what do you agree you owe or don't owe and why?". Davies has refused to do that for entirely party political reasons.
|
|
By:
Injera • October 16, 2017 5:57 PM BST
In all seriousness if we had the right people running the show we would start with a demand for £20BN and go from there. Not a chance we owe them a penny. Well Davies simply needs to set this out in a document and give it to the EU. He has refused to do so. |
|
By:
As I say, we need the right people. First rule of negotiation is position.
Where should Davis and May be? London. They can come here. If they want dosh let them beg. #leavingthebuilding |
|
By:
Dave, you understand we have to pay zero?
Why would we? We have put in far more into the assets of the EU than we have ever taken out. |
|
By:
For the umpteenth time "if we have to pay zero" then Davies should set that out in a document. He hasn't done so and that is the cause of the stalled negotiations.
|
|
By:
A50 never mentions a 'divorce bill'.
No side in the referendum debate ever mentioned a 'divorce bill'. It is something that was made up after the time to try to stop us leaving. |
|
By:
of course it was mentioned before
...the germans will be begging for a deal to avoid tariffs ....we were told |
|
By:
Viral video of the time of the brexit vote from Prof Michael Dougan about 14.00 in the vid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n2LcIfZNr4 |
|
By:
Davis is decent but soft. Only Moggy will deal with these fascists. Sadly May is so frightened of his intelligence she wouldn't dare give him a job.
|
|
By:
Davies is doing exactly as instructed for reasons I have explained.
|
|
By:
Dave no one who wants to leave is in the least bit interested in what Dougan had to say because he is one man on a mission. He is pro-EU so of course he takes their side.
Please link the documents that prove we have pay for future projects that we get no benefits from and that Davies must tell them exactly what we have to pay before the trade deal is done. |
|
By:
a) because Davies agreed to that format of negotiations
b) because (once again) if he doesn't think he owes anything he puts why in a document and the negotiations proceed the relevant source of the obligation is the Vienna Convention of Treaties. |
|
By:
A document?
Link please to this. |
|
By:
lol everytime I give you a link you ignore it saying it biased or msm or some such rubbish, so
"google is your friend" |