We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
No cash sales is the way.
|
|
By:
f somebody created cover, let's say phoned a friend before setting off to arrange for them to bring the cleaning materials for the other person to clean their home.....then went out and attacked ppl.
How would the police be able to charge them with carrying an offensive weapon if they were stopped before the first assault? Well that would depend on the circumstances but surely you aren't suggesting criminalising people taking cleaning products to another house to clean? |
|
By:
i put bleach into a spray bottle to kill mold on windows and ceilings.
Under this new law? that some are proposing I'm now a criminal? If people are attacking other people it's got nothing to to with the materials they are using.. unlike a gun which is designed to kill people, Bleach and acids have a purpose that is legitimate in everyday life. It's the people and their mental states that needs to be addressed. Respecting people and doing no violence needs to be the emphasis here. There are people out there that believe they are better than other people - Narcissism is the phrase used. They treat people as objects and they manipulate people. When they cannot have their way they turn to violence and destruction. CONTROL of their environment extends out to random violence. |
|
By:
SD
Not criminalising the taking of cleaning fluids between properties no, as long as they are retained in their original container, and by design that would erradicate the plausibility of deployment in the ways we have seen. You would be allowed to do what you want on your own premisis, just like owning knives is permissible as they suit a function....but leave the property with them (not in their original container) and just like the knife you would get a mandatory jail term. You got no chance changing people's mind set zorro. Look at the year (even by your 6000 year calendar) there has been plenty of time to change it if it were possible. |
|
By:
If someone was stopped by the police carrying cleaning fluids not in there container but in a cup or spray bottle then the likelihood is they would already be charged with carrying an offensive weapon regardless if someone says he was bringing it to mine to clean.
Your law change also wouldn't prevent someone carrying a bottle of cleaning fluid in their own container with an empty spray bottle in circumstances which suggest they were going to be used as a weapon so the police would end up resorting back to the current law anyway. There seems to be a lot of furore about changing the law when the law for acid is the same as screwdrivers, scissors, garden tools, baseball bats etc. etc. in terms of the possibility of being an offensive weapon, it's just that acid seems to be in fashion amongst idiots looking to assault people at the moment. Carrying a knife is also legal if you have a reasonable excuse so it's always possible to create cover by getting a friend to suggest you were bringing one round for some DIY. Whether or not it gets believed is another story. |
|
By:
Its about creating a standard, just like any other safety standard where certain chemicals are only permitted to be carried in certain containers.
Having a clearly defined law that chemicals taken out of these containers would be punishable is clear. If somebody transfered caustic chemicals out on the street that would be punishable just as it would be if I broke off a branch from a tree and fashioned it into a point to stab somebody in the neck. If you carry a knife you get 2 years, done. |
|
By:
someone on the the BBC last night said it was a problem Britain had going back 200 years,
no, no, I`m not telling lies. |
|
By:
that was music to the ears of the k*nts at the BBC.
|
|
By:
It may well have been, not at all relevant tho as we have evolved over the 200 years, unlike others. I suppose it's just another example of blaming ourselves for every ill visited upon us.
|
|
By:
We have not evolved over 200 years.
|
|
By:
my favourite year is 1874
|
|
By:
the year of the 1st impressionist art exhibition, or was that 1873 ?
whichever. |
|
By:
If somebody transfered caustic chemicals out on the street that would be punishable just as it would be if I broke off a branch from a tree and fashioned it into a point to stab somebody in the neck.
Yes under the current laws relating to offensive weapons. The same laws that can make carrying acid around in another container an offensive weapon. Its just reactionary law making that doesn't really change anything but make it more difficult for people trying to use these substances legally. The practical affect will be minimal but because the new legislation specifically refers to acid it will appease people as it looks as if something has been done. Next it will probably be the licensing of garden tools or large sports equipment if that becomes becomes the weapon of choice. |
|
By:
200 years? i thought evolutionists said we are the same as humans who were around 200,000 years ago? evolution is a slow,slow, process? unless you are an x-man?
it's our tools that have got better, crop growing etc. |
|
By:
this is classic evolved behaviour imo ,evolution only shapes a species subjected to a set of specific conditions ,nothing else
|
|
By:
I don't know about 200 years but doesn't the pre-war gangster Pinkie (Richard Attenborough) in Brighton Rock carry a bottle of acid, as well as a razor?
Not that this excuses or is even related to criminality now. |
|
By:
Amonia used to be the Job
|
|
By:
16 year old lad arrested
|
|
By:
Havent seen one main news outlet mention the rise in bike crime which directly links to this storey. The perpetrator was nicking mopeds. Because insurance companies foot the vast bulk of the bill and its hard to prosecute Police dont bother to do anything
|
|
By:
i was thinking more turf war ,but just theft of a scooter ,ffs thar about 1k ....desperados
|
|
By:
They use the mopeds to snatch bags and phones then dump em, I think.
|
|
By:
Proposed Solution to the Problem.
Anyone convicted will remain in prison indefinitely. Each night they will sleep in a restrained position on a specially constructed bed with a container of bleach suspended over their face. They will be given a pull switch which will dispense the liquid over their face. If they do so, they will be able to leave prison. Alternatively, each Saturday, they will be invited to draw a number from a bag containing balls number between 1 and 59 and will be strapped in a similar device and will watch the Lottery Draw. If their allocated number comes up they get a pint of corrosive liquid in their face. |
|
By:
There seems to be more than one thing going on here. In no particular order:
1) so-called honour crimes 2) theft (nicking mopeds for use in nicking phones, as @saddo says a couple of comments ago) 3) gangs (turf wars) 4) muggers 5) completely inexplicable attacks eg Tomlin who seems to have attacked that model and her friend simply because they were stopped at traffic lights when he happened on by You could, perhaps, lump 2, 3 and 4 together as having some sort of economic, criminal rationale. To the extent these people are at least thinking about how best to make money (illegally) they may respond to stiffer sentences or other changes in the law. The others are harder. 1 requires a change of attitudes about what is acceptable, and how do we get there from here? 5 -- well, what do you do about people who have a screw loose? |
|
By:
I don't know about 200 years but doesn't the pre-war gangster Pinkie (Richard Attenborough) in Brighton Rock carry a bottle of acid, as well as a razor?
The razor gangs used to tape part of the blade so they'd not "accidentally" kill their victims -- there was hanging in those days, of course. Apparently we are now seeing a similar trend of so-called "safe stabbings". http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/campaigners-issue-fresh-warning-over-disturbing-trend-of-safe-stabbings-in-london-a3588206.html It is of a piece with the rise in acid attacks in crime because in both cases there is an apparently rational aim to avoid a murder charge. It is proposed to show the gang members how dangerous all stabbings can be. The danger is the gangs just end up with a better idea of how to "safely" avoid major blood vessels. |
|
By:
BBC HEADLINE ON THIS ITEM
BOYS HURT IN COLLISION WITH POLICE http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-40624453 But lets read a Little further into the article The Heading Should Read 3 armed rsoles apprehended by Police |
|
By:
the guardian tried this line as well
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/16/london-teenager-in-critical-condition-after-moped-collides-with-police-car not KNIFE ARMED GANG etc etc |
|
By:
All three were arrested at the scene and two large knives were recovered.
The incident had been referred to the police watchdog. |
|
By:
Unbelievable Mois ,the Scum are running Riot , But we need the Police watch dog involved ,you cant make it up.
|
|
By:
but we can't have the nazi state going around harming innocent youngsters leisurely perambulating around the city on their private transport
|
|
By:
Poor Young Chaps 3 of em on one Bike at 2 in the Morning
|
|
By:
Should've reversed over the other two imo.
|
|
By:
As Long as the Watchdog investigation takes Place that is the Main thing , The young Chaps will probably Recieve a small Fine and Be sent on their Way ,while the tax payer Pays thousands to Find out how this dreadful Event could ever have happened ,procedures wlll be put in place ...
|
|
By:
Delivery drivers led by Jabed Hussain, the victim of an acid attack last week, have held a noisy protest outside parliament demanding protection from violence.
Hundreds of motorcycle and moped riders, who say they fear for their safety while working, brought traffic around Parliament Square to a standstill with their vehicles on Tuesday. They say the attack on Hussain, who had his scooter stolen in one of five alleged acid-throwing incidents in east London on Thursday night, reflects an environment in which they and their vehicles are constantly targeted. “We are scared. [The] government’s not taking enough action, [the] government’s not providing enough police,” said Hussain, who organised the demonstration. “I am a victim of an acid attack, I don’t want anyone else to experience the feeling of it. I felt fire on my face ... Who is going to give us our dignity? I want to ask the prime minister, who is sleeping [on the job] right now.” Hussain said many delivery drivers were refusing to work after 8pm because they did not feel safe and many were considering leaving the job even if they had to “live on the streets”. He promised more demonstrations if drivers were not listened to. “This has happened so many times, that’s why all the drivers are angry,” he said. Delivery drivers, some wearing the distinctive liveries of their employers, tooted their horns, revved their engines, and chanted: “No more acid attacks.” They blocked off the north side of Parliament Square with their vehicles and marched around the square holding a large banner, which read: “Stop acid attacks, bike theft, motorcycle crime.” Wellington Silveira, 33, from Brazil, said he had been in London working as a delivery driver for about 10 years, but things had deteriorated to the extent that he was thinking of moving out of the city. “I work in Islington, north London,” said Silveira, who works for UberEats and Deliveroo. “All day I have these problems; people trying to steal my bike. It’s not safe. I stop work at 10pm because it’s too dangerous.” Bilal Zari, 32, said: “It’s about us being able to provide a service to people and put food on the table for our family. We are hard-working people.” Zari said he had been threatened with reduced hours if he attended the demonstration, but had gone along anyway. “I am a father, I have two kids, [aged] two and three: that’s more important,” he said. While Hussain said he was not blaming police, Silveira and Zari demanded tougher action by officers. Hussain, an UberEats delivery driver, was on his moped at the corner of Queensbridge Road and Hackney Road when two men on a moped pulled up alongside and threw acid on him. It was the first of five acid attacks to take place in a three-mile radius. He believes his helmet saved him from more serious injuries, but one of the alleged victims could lose sight in one eye. Will Shu, the chief executive of Deliveroo, sent an email to his drivers on Tuesday pledging to protect them. He said a contact line has been set up for them to report concerns and no driver would have to work in an area where they felt unsafe. A 16-year-old boy, who cannot be named because of his age, appeared in a youth court in east London on Monday accused of carrying out attacks on six victims on 13 July. He denies charges including wounding, robbery and possession of a weapon. |
|
By:
Aren't all the "if someone were stopped by the police and found to be carrying bleach ..." scenarios a bit irrelevant now? I thought the police were no longer allowed to stop and search.
Disclaimer: I may be out of touch these days with the sus laws and community relations and that sort of thing, having not lived in London for 30 years. Thank Christ. |
|
By:
But, oc, you think you're missing out
![]() |
|
By:
It's the mad bomb affect. People have lost all sense of authority.
That's why election results are mocked. Instead of getting on with governing, governments are struggling to maintain power. Trump is in dispute. Teresa May, Venezuela, It's all up in the air. Shouting down people at the Grenfell community meeting before any action can be taken? All authority is disputed. So people are doing what they want, including violent crime. they eroded the safety net, benefits, the NHS, the police, every service out there. Nature abhors a vacuum so people are moving into the space. Lawlessness increases with police numbers being cut. |
|
By:
@screaming from beneaththewaves -- Disclaimer: I may be out of touch these days with the sus laws and community relations and that sort of thing, having not lived in London for 30 years. Thank Christ.
Community relations and even race are red herrings -- it is gangs. In different parts of London it might be Black or Asian gangs in Black or Asian areas but in the north-west it seems to be mainly White kids shooting and stabbing each other. What can be done about it, I've no idea. |