We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 58 comments are related to the topic:
Bet you did'nt know this fact of life in the universe.
Bet you did'nt know this fact of life in the universe.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 58
|
By:
Kaballah - £300 for a bottle of water and a piece of string may be ok for Madonna and Britney but I think I'll swerve it.
|
|
By:
somebody would have to be the first to go back in time
but if you went back and showed somebody how to do it then it would already be history |
|
By:
Brassneck - is that how you've managed to win £140k on football already this season?
|
|
By:
http://www.momentmag.com/jewish-thought-influenced-science/
God favours the Jews and they have made science what it is today. They supplied the methodology taking it away from the Greeks. before it was all physical materials. But we now are in a world of intangibles. |
|
By:
nick,my system works ,so I can win as much as I want to but I am not greedy.And so can you if you follow the one rule that I say.and then just look at your available to bet balance go up like a petrol pump,but don't bring attention to yourself trying to make 100 grand a week or you will be stopped,settle for a couple of grand a week.A drop in the bucket and it will still fill up but nobody will notice.
 |
|
By:
you all went wrong with NEWTON.
GRAVITY. you made it King of the universe. but if you look at the atom, delve down into the atom. it's all about the electro magnetic fields. Gravity is weak. the electro magnetic force is vastly stronger. They tell you that 96 percent of the universe is missing (dark matter and dark energy) but if they take out gravity and put in the electro magnetic force it is all there. They made Gravity king, when it's the deuce. the micro world is the same as the macro world. It's controlled by electro magnetism. If it was gravity the spirals we see would be all gone by now. dissipated. |
|
By:
NICK,remember you have to crawl before you walk,and walk before you run.But people only notice when you run in the 100 meter's in the olimpics.
 |
|
By:
I think that dark matter is anti gravity,but nobody knows,there had to be anti gravity at the first impact(big bang)but where did it go,so brassneck comes up with another unanswerable question for the scientiests.remember you heard this question here first from brass.
 |
|
By:
correction=dark energy
|
|
By:
quote -
"Is the electromagnetic force really strong?" It is very strong and this is surprising too because it can work over an infinite range. To give you an idea, the electromagnetic force is approximately 1036 times stronger than the earth's gravitational field! That is (to put it in perspective) 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times stronger than gravity on Earth! If this was not the case, all material would collapse into a black hole! Forces compete, on Earth the electromagnetic force wins. In a black hole, gravity is a very strong contender. "What does the electromagnetic force repel and attract?" -------------------- it's a tug o war being described... gravity and electromagnetism. There is no missing matter or dark energy. just controlled chaos. abstraction. |
|
By:
Scientists know the universe is expanding at an increasing rate. They say “dark energy” is the force behind this expansion. They don’t know what “dark energy” is, but it may defy Einstein’s theory of gravity.
A NASA paper describing dark energy says one possibility “is that Einstein’s theory of gravity is not correct.” “That would not only affect the expansion of the universe, but it would also affect the way that normal matter in galaxies and clusters of galaxies behaved,” the paper states. “This fact would provide a way to decide if the solution to the dark energy problem is a new gravity theory or not: we could observe how galaxies come together in clusters. But if it does turn out that a new theory of gravity is needed, what kind of theory would it be?” ALSO SEE: Immense Force Changing Cosmos—Baffled Scientists Rethink Current Paradigm |
|
By:
summed up - brexit - 49 percent vs 51 percent
Cluster Fked physics. it's a big guessing game. |
|
By:
if we are all holograms why does my wife weigh so much ?
|
|
By:
Zorro,I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU(sometimes I think you are brian cox).
QUESTION="one second before the big bang,why did the (everything contained=the future universe)in the small ball, not collapse into a blackhole"and why did the gravity of the universe (included in the small ball )not stop the big bang. This proves to me that there had to be anti gravity inside the small ball but all the everything should have collapsed and formed a blackhole so it proves to me that the big bang did not happen ,and the universe was always there and always will be there ,unless of course someone or some god created it." |
|
By:
I've posted before that HORIZON screened a program on physicists who
do not believe in the big Bang Paradigm. It was narrated by Bernard Hill. "Horizon" What Happened Before the Big Bang? (TV Episode 2010) It's consensus science - it's not based on proof. It's opinion. they have observations and then they make a story to fit what they see. There's no way to recreate the event because we are in it. it's like trying to imagine a chicken when you are inside the atom of a fried egg. With Time it will come? maybe. Steven Weinberg says we'll never know, it's too complicated (nobel prize winner and atheist) |
|
By:
can i have copyright on that sentence?
|
|
By:
See.
What I said! It's about what we don't know, not what we do. And we know more or less nothing. |
|
By:
To say that life has a 0% chance of evolving by chance is wrong.
because the sentence doesn't make sense. it would make more sense to say that life has a 0% chance of not evolving by chance. because it is not possible for anything not to evolve, that is alive. |
|
By:
I had an epiphany about all this today. Probably one that most have had already.
Theres two big elements of chance necessary to get where we are today, the chance of life, and the chance of reproduction. So life must be a relatively common phenomena for us to have landed the reproduction element too. Its just that most of the other life out there just crops up and dies without getting anywhere. |