Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
brassneck
09 Jul 17 19:54
Joined:
Date Joined: 13 Feb 03
| Topic/replies: 21,811 | Blogger: brassneck's blog
Life has a 0% possibility of evolving by chance.Thats a scientific fact.So it doesn't matter how many planets we find with possible life on them.if you multiply by 0% you get =ZERO.LaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 58
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Jul 17 20:02
You win your bet, brassneck, I didn't know that.Wink
By:
brassneck
When: 09 Jul 17 20:07
just after reading this.when the maths experts do their sums they always get zero %Shocked
By:
brassneck
When: 09 Jul 17 20:09
So I guess we should not be here according to the maths.Grin
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Jul 17 20:11
We are just holograms according to some so we aren't really here.Cool
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Jul 17 20:12
Smoke and mirrors
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 09 Jul 17 20:33
Not sure your scientific fact can be confirmed as a scientific fact.
Actually, I'm fairly sure it isn't scientific fact!
So once you discount the fact that it cannot (by dint of a probably infinite universe) be cited as a fact, the rest of the factual arithmetic sort of goes out of the wormhole.
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Jul 17 21:06
Spoilsport. Grin
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 09 Jul 17 21:47
I like your idea that we're all holograms though.
There might be whole hologram planets.
Parallel universes like planet of the apes.... all sorts
Loads to have fun with.

It can all be found on futurama.
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Jul 17 21:55
Wouldn't be surprised to see the crazy gang here before long to discuss all that. Looking forward to it.
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 09 Jul 17 22:01
It'll all be the because of lefties and the religion of peace.
Crazy
By:
i_agree_with_nick
When: 09 Jul 17 22:15
Drake Equation - BBC4 tonight
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 09 Jul 17 22:23
If it's all illusion then anything you create or build is illusion?
Museums full of art worth billions all illusion.
all the books illusions. the forests and the animals.

Somehow it's all a computer projection, now that we all use computers?
nobody said this in 1920, when computers didn't exist?
It's because we watch screens now all day that we associate reality with
a flickering image. It's just another stupid theory. Not yet a LAW.

How many physic students are there? how many physics professors?
because they all have to justify their existence and come up with
a thesis to pass out of Universities. Or to get a job promotion?
In art schools like Goldsmiths you have to come up with some deep thought
BS to sell your wares. Blood sculptures. Paintings made with elephant dung.
a dead shark split down the middle with a fly colony trapped within.
It's the same thing. I am an individual with a mad idea. I'm interesting.
I wear a pie hat and have a gold tooth. It's all absurd. reality has left
the building. Occasionally they chance upon something that works.. a mold dish
that has been left out. Then they investigate it at length to find out why
it works. But all they are doing is discovering. They are rarely understanding
the mechanism. If they did making new antibiotics would be an everyday activity.
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 09 Jul 17 22:24
2 things about the Drake equation.
1. It only applies to our galaxy and not the whole universe
and
2. It makes suppositions about the form life takes - ie that what's needed is Earthlike planets and conditions.

Anyone who's ever seen star trek knows life could be made of energy and come from a giant space whale!
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Jul 17 22:26
I think I've seen it before. Nick but I've put it on record as I have to be up early tomorrow.
By:
i_agree_with_nick
When: 09 Jul 17 22:28
It's a chilling thought but I do believe it's likely we're alone in the universe.
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 09 Jul 17 22:32
nope - there is God and there's the fallen angels that pretend to be gods.
so we are not alone.
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Jul 17 22:36
Piero Manzoni, Merda d'Artista, Zorro, remember him from your art appreciation classes? Grin
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 09 Jul 17 22:36
Zorro, at the risk of getting into a theological spat
(actually, I won't because I'm turning this off and going to bed now)

The issue is simple:
Space is very big. We don't get it, because we aren't capable of getting it and we don't have enough information to go on, plus we are completely incapable of understanding big spaces or long periods of time, let alone infinity.

So Religion makes for a handy, popular, catch-all and safe(ish) explanation.
There's no proof of any of it any more than there is proof that there isn't of it.
I know what is more likely though.

I_agree_with_nick - I don't agree with you Happy
It is almost impossible, imo that we are alone. We all just so far apart we'll never meet. Then there's the timing aspect.
Just suppose someone found this planet at any time in the last 4 billion years or so. They had, for most of it, found no life, for loads of it rudimentary life and for about 5,000 years (the equivalent of a few seconds if it was all equal to a 24 hour clock) some form of intelligence - and that's assuming they didn't see this forum.

Even then 70% of the Earth is Sea, about 50% -(guess) is uninhabitable, so they'd need to be lucky enough to find the right bits.
Then there's the size/time thing.
They'd need to exist in our time frame, and they'd need to be of an equivalent size. They could be 1 inch creatures in 3 foot ships, they might breathe methane.

Plenty of life, just no chance of seeing it.
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Jul 17 22:43
If it's possible here, it's possible elsewhere so I do not think we are alone as a life form.
Communication is the problem due to the vast distances and the time it takes for information to travel from one place to another at the speed of light. (100,000 years just to cross our galaxy). Should we by chance hear a message from ET it's likely they had gone extinct before we evolved, (or before Adam and Eve if you prefer).
By:
i_agree_with_nick
When: 09 Jul 17 22:45
Totally agree about the timing and scale aspects.

What I can't get past is the massive leap from chemistry to biology. The one place where we know that conditions are ideal for the support of life is here on Earth.

So why in 5 billion years has life only occurred once? (Virtually the entire scientific community agree that we are all decscended from the first single-celled organism.)
By:
donny osmond
When: 09 Jul 17 22:46
we are here to invent AI

then they can colonise the universe

simples

we will be their god
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Jul 17 22:46
message crossed with studyform's. We were thinking along the same lines.
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 09 Jul 17 22:49
We don't know, I_A_W_N.
It just fits current theory.

Maybe in a hundred years they'll discover Dinosaurs went to school and played big pianos!
Or Mars had lots of underground life 2 billion years ago.

I can remember when Jupiter had 9 moons and Saturn 5!
We know nothing.

btw, fwiw, I think the big bang theory is a load of toffee too. No-one's going to listen to me about it though.
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 09 Jul 17 22:49
I'm aware of the scale - over a trillion stars per person on earth. and the nearest one is 4 miles away if we scale our planets down to one meter across.
My school pal became head of astronomy. I got the lectures.
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Jul 17 22:50
The conditions when the first life formed were very different to now (no free oxygen for example). Soon after the first life appeared the conditions would have changed. Any new starter life forms would have been eaten by the existing ones.
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 09 Jul 17 22:50
Forget the stuff we know, zorro. It's about the stuff we DON'T know.

Which is nearly everything.
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 09 Jul 17 22:52
The universe has to be that vast. Otherwise Carbon atoms could not form.
But it all fits into sub dimensions and there is higher dimensions.
so we see it as big and God sees it as small.
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Jul 17 22:54
Checking out for tonight. Happy
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 09 Jul 17 22:56
There was an idea a few years ago that if we sprinkled some Silver Iodide into Venus's atmosphere, then it might cause rain to form and fall and cool the planet down and that in a couple of hundred years make it more visitable and manageable.

My guess is that this was just a way for some scientists to get funding (wages) for some nonsense work, which unfortunately is what much astronomy is. Still it gives Journalists who are easily blinded and confused by science easy work.

Zorro - All manner of heavier elements are formed by Supernovae, over a long time and in big enough quantity to form a self-propelling method of production (which we have on earth).

Night Foinavon.
Don't dwell too much on this.
By:
i_agree_with_nick
When: 09 Jul 17 22:58
We don't know how life formed. Scientists have attempted to create life under laboratory conditions but have only been able to produce RNA which are required for the formation of DNA but are non-biological molecules.
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 09 Jul 17 23:00
evolution is dead - didn't you get the memo?

they gave up on the tree of life.
they abandoned an explanation of how life began.
they concede with reluctance that a designer might be involved(aliens by dawkins).
They have the fibonacci sequence dictating the structures of everything.
all the universal constants are on a knife edge of ridiculousness.
DNA is information, and information needs to be sent and received.
they can not observe the past, so time indexing it is stupid.

Writing began at the time Adam Appeared. 195 thousand years of doing nothing?
but in the last six thousand years we are super special? mere coincidence.
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 09 Jul 17 23:01
in a lab - get your own building blocks? you have to start with inert matter.
By:
brassneck
When: 09 Jul 17 23:02
I think I will invent a time machine and go into the future and then I can come back and tell you all.After all even the great Albert Einstein said that it was his belief that man will travel into the future some day but he was not so sure about travelling back to the past.Now I am not one for arguing with the great man ,so I guess a time machine could sort a lot out,but how does one get back from the future if you go there.Grin
By:
i_agree_with_nick
When: 09 Jul 17 23:03
I have an open mind - including to the possibility of a creator. I wouldn't rule anything out!
By:
donny osmond
When: 09 Jul 17 23:05
travelling forward in time should be fairly easy in the future

going back doest sound so easy and i dont see any future folk coming back to teach us how !
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 09 Jul 17 23:06
if you are outside of the sub dimensions. Then you can see all of the road. all of time.
we are stuck in these dimensions. God sees the end from the beginning. Time travel as a concept was in the bible.
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 09 Jul 17 23:10
You guys don't get it - it's all Kaballah mysticism.
Most of the nobel prize winners are all Jewish.
The great Einstein.

go look up ideas from Kaballah Mystics - it's your science.
it's multiverses, it's the micro and macro.

Science started out of alchemy and black magic.
they wanted gold from lead(chemistry)
By:
i_agree_with_nick
When: 09 Jul 17 23:10
Surely if travelling back in time will ever be possible, someone would have come back from the future to the earliest point in time at which they wouldn't have been dismissed as a wacko!

Are we there yet?
By:
brassneck
When: 09 Jul 17 23:11
I am just after doing my first test on going into the future ,so I went into life this day next year and only stayed 20 seconds and I have returned ok ,so my first test was successful.(As I was only there for 20 seconds I could not find out much other that Manchester City won the premier league by 8 points) but a first successful mission.Laugh
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com