Jul 7, 2017 -- 2:24PM, moisok wrote:
I wonder how many attacks on people belonging to the wrong religion have been religiously reported by the freedom loving guardian.You see, when you have an agenda, you have to assign victim status to emphasise your slant on news.
Surely they'd have been reported somewhere though.
Jul 7, 2017 -- 2:36PM, Ibrahima Sonko wrote:
So you do not think that acid attacks are prevalent in certain religions ?
Not really . Happens a lot in Pakistan/Bangladesh , but even more in India among Hindus predominantly . Other places where it is especially common seem to be Vietnam ,Cambodia .The common factor with the frequency of sulphuric acid attacks is how easy it is to get hold of in a country.
Jul 7, 2017 -- 4:06PM, Shrewd_dude wrote:
The one with the 2 cousins has no known connection between them and the perpertrator . So they assume he attacked them because 'they looked like muslims'This is the problem though. This has simply been assumed for no other reason than they were muslims. There doesn't appear to be any motive and the attack seems to random at the moment but because they are muslim it must be religiously motivated.
A completely random , motiveless , acid attack would seem highly unlikely . So , if the only thing the attacker knew about the victims was what they looked like , then a racist motive would seem very probable . The alternative maybe that he was hired by someone with a grudge, but presumably that's been looked into ( though the Met screw up a lot of cases tbf)
Jul 7, 2017 -- 4:19PM, Ibrahima Sonko wrote:
tobes you need to come back and explain that acid attacks are common outside religion ?
I thought i had done . As said you have countries with little or no muslims high up in the top 10 of countries where this happens (Vietnam, Cambodia , etc )
Jul 10, 2017 -- 3:21AM, Shrewd_dude wrote:
Muslims are evidence of his attitude towards them .Attitude towards them yes. Evidence of why he assaulted one two years later, no. Although I'd still like you to quote this non vague post you refer to.
Clearly it is evidence for a motive . You can't still be saying the thing he liked was 'vague' in what is being referred to ? A Facebook group full of hatred against Muslims talks about Britons fighting back next to an image of a Crusader Knight . Doesn't seem very ambiguous to me.
Jul 10, 2017 -- 12:34PM, Shrewd_dude wrote:
I can't see any link to what you are referring to but posts do seem to appear and disappear on the forum.
Well i posted it , didn't appear , then was there later and then some other posts went and reappeared so it's hard to follow stuff here for sure.
Jul 10, 2017 -- 3:54PM, casemoney wrote:
What happened about the 17 year old Immigrant (looked 35 when pictures were Shown) who was standing at a bus stop outside a pub at 11.50 pm and was attacked by Racists from the said Pub ,a Pub that Appears to have been ran by an African Gentlemen ,whos clientele Were Black and White Racist Types ,That one seemed to go a Bit quite after the Pictures of the innocent Mite were published ,any updates on that One ? I must have missed them . Were big big Headlines in the Mirror and the Guardian a few months back even the Beeb don't appear to have Updates ,The one where Miss Abbot was in Uproar then suddenly went Quite when the involvement of Black youths became apparent ..
Not gonna be any updates between charging people and start of trial.