Foxy gone

its getting a bit stupid

foxy posted some excellent stuff on the grenfell thread


i read anxious has gone too



i got banned not long back without ever getting a warning and the post i was banned for
remains on the forum

yet other posts are removed seemingly without good reason

take care all

It's a shame that people are getting banned for fairly innocuous posts - It all seems a bit OTT.

Isn't this btf's 2nd ban in a few months, Can't augur well for a return. I had btf down as a good egg. Anxious is no loss with his leftie let em all in rhetoric.  Can't be a coincidence that anxious appeared to be an enema of btf and they both got banned!

I got banned for a fortnight without ever once breaking the advertised forum rules. Despite being the target of frequent abuse ( the C word and F word included) the worst I ever called anybody was a buttercup or a cupcake. For this, one anonymous user saw fit to report me eleven times in the space of three weeks!

Hmmm! Who could that possibly be I wonder?

He was making some very useful contributions on the Grenfell thread but then veered off and starting being abusive to me and AT for literally no apparent reason which I pulled him up on and he became more abusive, on the anagrams thread he started attacking me again out of the blue, unprovoked and unwarranted, you can still read the posts, every name under the sun was aimed at me, even laughed at one of them. It may have been aimed at me, but I'm not the only person that can read them, I'm not the only person that can be offended by them, I'm not the only person that can report them and fwiw, I did not report him neither could I care less if you don't believe it, he made his own bed and now he's lying in it. Clearly has some kind of temper or drink problem to keep going on these late night rants. Not sure why anyone would make excuses for him, he lets himself down with the way he becomes so vitriolic and personal esp considering nobody was insulting him on or near the same level. Should know better at his age.

Shame about anxious.

I saw the spat involving Boxy last night - before much of the offending material was removed - and I suspect that Boxy has got his ticket because he used a couple of offensive words (beginning with an F and a P) in describing Scandinavian Haven. No doubt Boxy knew full well that he was contravening the rules and it might get him banned but probably didn't care. Where's the consistency though? Others appear to get away with worse on a regular basis.

In answering my own question, it is probably because some of us have better things to do than keep hitting the report button.

PP says anyone denying being a grass makes him think they are. (Today on the anxious thread).
That's pals for you Scandi.

Sad to see the level of bitterness increase on an ever decreasing forum.

Exactly. The Horse Racing forum is a prime example. There used to be a lot of good info and banter on there. These days it is totally unrecognisable.  A lot of petty squabbles on this forum as well with people trading insults when they are unable to put up a suitable debate!

I thought you had posted a well balanced reply scandy, until the last line. A shame we won't have to read "spiv" or "fanboys" 50 times a day? Not really is it

aka you asked me directly in the opening post, and now I denied not reporting him I am guilty

All very sad, used to be a laugh on here. Many many good lads be banned on here for fu ck all. To any grasses on here man up ffs

Anybody know how long the ban is?
Hopefully he'll be back.
Hopefully a few quizzes will be run before he gets back though.

SHAVEN THE ODDS WERE UP FOR THE TESCO'S EVENT ,THIS COULD HAVE BEEN SORTED LIKE PROPER GENTLEMAN ,I'M SORRY ,BUT I CAN ONLY ASSUME YOU OR ONE OF THE TEAM GRASSED HIM

I LIKED BOX HE WAS A DECENT POSTER ..

Always thought btf was a good egg.

It's a joke this place, boxingthefox is a decent man. Another goodun gone, there is hardly anyone left

I was reported eleven times by the same anonymous user (no prizes for guessing who it was). None of the 'offending' posts even came close to contravening the rules, they are still there in fact, but I was still given a two week ban nevertheless. There are several on here (several usernames anyway) who see fit to take offence at anything that doesn't fit their own agenda and quickly hit the report button. Massive long rants of lefty nonsense are usually a good indicator to spot the culprits.

They are such sensitive souls, they'll probably report this post, too!

I had one take umbrage with what I said and threatened me with violence before telling me he was reporting me.
Needless to say I hadn't broken any of the T&Cs and I never report people so neither of us got a ban.
BTW he hasn't thanked me for not reporting him for the threats.

Just one person noticed that I had been banned. What a surprise! They even knew before I did! I didn't realise for a week.

That's scandilous Torque.
Used to be a haven for common sense on here, no more though.
I'm pondering who you are talking about here.

Sorry Aka, I cannot say, it would be beneath me to grass someone up.

Even though they reported me 11 times for using dreadful words like buttercup and cupcake!

Aka accuses people of 'grassing' so often he sounds paranoid, or maybe it's something he's used to doing himself.
Also, if you say someone threatened you aka, and you are insinuated it was me, please feel free to repost or point towards the thread in which those threats were made, because that certainly isn't my style!

How exactly would one know how many times one was reported, so many of my posts have been removed (because the likes of the above who say they haven't reported anyone before and reported them), 11 is quite specific, why would any moderator count up and tell you that number

I'm sure underneath boxing is a good person, however anyone reading the anamgrams thread knows by any forums Terms and conditions that is a banning, he effed and blinded for ages. If it makes you feel better keep accusing me, especially akabula, who must be reeling at the minute after Rangers became the laughing stock of world football losing to the 4th best team in Luxembourg

Take your time to answer these points when you've both finished rubbing each others back

Also, if you say someone threatened you aka, and you are insinuated it was me, please feel free to repost or point towards the thread in which those threats were made, because that certainly isn't my style!

Where do I 'insinuate' that it was you? You know who reported me after threatening me because he told us all on the thread.

Take your time to answer this point when you've finished dubbing your handbag

11 times is specific because that is specifically what I was told. I wasn't informed who reported me, just the number. Not difficult to understand really, unlike your post with its usual array of spelling mistakes and grammatical errors.

Genuinely funny that you get labelled paranoid, Aka, by somebody accusing you of accusing him of threatening behaviour!

Looks like Scandis ran away.

He's probably just composing another massive long rant - and double checking the spelling.

Truly disappointed.
No thanks from SF for not reporting him for his threats and no apology from Scandi for a false accusation on here.
Standards have slipped on here.

but at least you still are consistent in not believing in guilt by association aka ( apart from the mayor of london, although it seems corbyn is damned by his associations in your view ).

still with your plastic football team losing to the fourth bet team in luxembourg i am sure you have much to celebrate

Be very interested to see a post where I've spoke about the mayor of London.
Hopefully just a mistake on your part and not a deliberate lie.

Need you back Foxy. Place getting overrun with trolling bankers.

Best not dwell on it Aka. Scandy and SF are so alike it wouldn't surprise me if they were the same poster.

It's a shame that Foxy has gone, hopefully he will be back eventually.

The equivalent of fake news.
Away and wrestle a kangaroo or something.

i do recall bringing the subject up at the time but you would not reply, i wonder why?

Still laughing at that. A year ago and you remember so much detail! Get a life bud.

but at least you still are consistent in not believing in guilt by association aka ( apart from the mayor of london, although it seems corbyn is damned by his associations in your view

You come on a thread to make a comment completely unrelated to the topic then post this nonsense.

i remember what i said and what you said. earlier you were suggesting i was deliberately lying, now you've changed track as you have realised i am telling the truth.
you really arent very good at this at all aka, so what i said is the truth? will you admit that? probably not.

In the first sentence you are saying I'm admitting it's the truth yet in the second saying I probably won't admit it.

i said you 'realised' i was telling the truth which clearly isnt the same thing as admitting i am telling the truth.

nuance isnt your thing is it aka? your response just shows i am right. and you still havent admitted the truth have you?

i came into this thread because i saw you talking about false accusations. will you now admit that what the tories said about khan were false accusations? and you joined in these false  accusations at the time, but did not withdraw them when they were shown to be false, even after i asked you several times about them. or dont you remember?

So lets get this right.
You came on here to pull me up about comments I supposedly made a year ago, is that correct?
Frightening. Like I said bud get a life or at least seek he

From a year ago. How sad are you.

more distraction, you poor thing.

Oh that's cutting.

nearly as cutting as 'Away and wrestle a kangaroo or something.'

still unable to tell/admit the truth aka

aka I misread that post on threats.

Best not dwell on it Aka. Scandy and SF are so alike it wouldn't surprise me if they were the same poster.


Foinavon, in which way are we both alike, I find it flattering as he is obviously quite bright but he is about 20 odd years older than me, I also think it's disappointent you make that insinuation just because we agree on basic things, many posters on here do particular right wingers.

Foxy did lose it from time to time but was always the first to admit it and apologise when he crossed a line.

Scandinavian Haven and Studyform perhaps the same person you say, Foinavon? Hmmm, what a shame one of them hasn't ever logged on to the wrong account and replied as the other one by mistake at some time in the recent past. Then we could be sure.

Oh, hang on!

It is just an impression I gained from reading their posts, not just the similarities in political ideas but the writing style and ways of expressing themselves.

You could say that about many, for examle Torque and moisok seem very similar, bith quite simple souls but with neurotic tendancies.

you're wrong foinavon, hope you was not a detective in your formative years lol.

fascists of the euro loving merkel sucking up faction  - don't you just love 'em

I didn't say it was the case Scandy, just that it seemed that way to me but I'll take your word for it.
Torque seems to think that you used both accounts by mistake when conversing with him. That's hard to explain if true.

haven you need to .....   I am not neurotic. I know you are merkel's baby. But I am certain they are waiting round the corner for me coz you have sent your mates.

nothing personnelllll.

feel free to bump that thread so I can read what he is babbling on about.

Scandanavian_haven = "Vain and insane chav" (from the anagram thread)

Gutted about Boxer, one of the good guys, but let's face it he probably doesn't give a flying fook. Also I agree with his theory that the person he used to have a little 'tete a tete' with is definitely a chick.

Loving that anagram

Test.

Torque testing which account he's just logged in as

And that anagram doesn't work with the way my name is spelt

Foinavon.

SH confidently challenges you to find the thread where he got two of his accounts mixed up because he knows that he had the incriminating post quickly removed in desperation. You can still make out the gist of it though, as I copied and pasted it before it disappeared. Look in the archives - the thread was called something like 'French Presidential Elections, Post Your Predictions'.

It still makes me chuckle.

haven is a bit of werk

you should see what he has accused me of on another thread

if it had any basis then fair enough

but he simply loses the thread and goes on some sort of attack mode

without checking what one has said ho ho

but fling enough of it they say it sticks

but isn't that the modus of these eu merkel sucking up boys

What did he accuse you of, Moisok?

what was you 'testing' torque

so obvious.

I was testing I hadn't been banned again actually!

My username had disappeared from the top and my posts were not appearing.

How many accounts have you actually got, SH?

No answer? Or is it really so many that you're still counting?

Torque, why would a post be removed if it didn't contravene forum rules? Something suspicious there.
If they are not the same person then might they have access to each other's accounts.
SH seems to know a lot about SF from what he posted on this thread, age difference for example.

I hadn't read that thread, moisok but now see what you mean.
All that "mental assessment" stuff is strange. In my case, I'm too old to run so it wouldn't be an option, just throw everything within reach at the assailant's head and use a chair or stool to fend him off and buy time.

that's a daft post foinavon, you pick up stuff as you read as you do, I remember you saying you were 74, are we the same person too because I know your age? of course not. And that's the only 'personal' think I know about him, so I don't know where you get 'a lot'

scandanavian_haven
07 Jul 17 23:54
Joined: 27 May 11
| Topic/replies: 7,346 | Blogger: scandanavian_haven's blog
so far we'e had you telling us you're brave and telling others they're not, given how much of a ranting keyboard warrior you are, you give the opposite impression.



I still want to know where I have said anything like this.    'so far we'e had you telling us you're brave and telling others they're not'
Where did that come from?
It gets a bit much when you put words in my mouth or invent statements and attribute them to me.  All I have done is to challenge your odd statements.  You seem to wish to indulge in false practices.  You have been caught out again.

I never said I was 74 scandy, not there yet. Cemetery side of 70, yes.

see how he attributes incorrect information yet again

I wasn't saying that because he knows how much older SH is that they are the same person, quite the contrary. I know how much older I am than my wife, for example, that doesn't imply that we are the same person just that we know each other rather well.

Does anyone else think it odd that studyform hasn't added his two penny worth to this thread yet?
Perhaps scandy is speaking on his behalf.

maybe he thinks that kind of post and others are beneath him, should probably have ignored the nonsense myself, same 7-8 argumentative posters who can't get a big enough audience on the politcs forum anymore so bring their rubbish here.

Jul 6, 2017 -- 1:27PM, akabula wrote:

Truly disappointed. No thanks from SF for not reporting him for his threats and no apology from Scandi for a false accusation on here.Standards have slipped on here.

They certainly have!

They who smelt it dealt it. imo.

For the avoidance of doubt - I do NOT have any other accounts or usernames. There are plenty of people on here who know me who know this.
As opposed to some no-marks who make silly accusations.

If I have anything to say to anyone, I will say it.

Don`t be silly, we don`t come here to talk politics, we come here to chortle at study, facts and you, vain, and insane, chav; (well, if you knew how to spell your own name, that is!).  Great fun it is too!!!

Proof, as if it were needed.

Studyform, you state that you have no other accounts or usernames...fair enough.

I fail to see, however, how anyone else on here could know that for certain unless they had access to Betfair's confidential database. Are you saying that you know people who do?

Still no thanks from SF from saving him from a ban.
Mind you I suppose with more than 1 account then a ban means nothing.

Foinavon, it was more by way of character reference. That and the fact I've been on here regularly since 2005.
Alth0ugh tbh, I'm not really sure how or why anyone would have more than 1 account.

Akabula, how old are you. 14?
If I could think of anything I could possibly have to thank you for......
Saving me from a ban. Yeah, right.

I think a lot of the second accounts were set up by people who had received a ban.
It wasn't difficult in the early days but Betfair have tightened up on registrations since then.

At that time Foinavon, same as now, you could have only 1 B/F betting account however unlike now you could have more than 1 forum account.

you could have unlimited accounts back in the day

each one came with its own forum account

After I posted that Donny I thought it might be wrong.
Did they differentiate between Poker and Sports accounts?
Something at the back of my mind tells me they did.

you could just open an account , deposit, match £10 and get posting with a new name ....

You just registered a different credit card for each account.
I didn't see the point but I know others did.

If you avoid Chit Chat and Politics you have a minimal chance of being banned..i.m.o.