Weak men more likely to be socialists, study claims...

^ g2d again

Just realised that spelled SHAT, sounds about right.

Joseph Stalin  weak ?

Aneirun Bevan ?

btf is not bothered with all this forum bickering.....g2d is

When Hitler invaded Russia Stalin had a mental breakdown.

May 30, 2017 -- 9:29PM, anxious wrote:

Joseph Stalin

Blair was the only strong socialist. They don't like it though.

Someone recently quoted Winston Churchill as saying “If a man is not a socialist by the time he is 20, he has no heart. If he is not a conservative by the time he is 40, he has no brain.”

I think that's more like it.

anxious - Sir Winston Churchill said you haven't got a brain.

Churchill was a good judge!

Churchill advocated the use of Gas weapons in WW1

Stalin killed his own generals, and 50 million of his own subjects, are you holding him up as a figure, of socialism/commusim.

.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2013/sep/01/winston-churchill-shocking-use-chemical-weapons

Leopard, hates Churchill, probably hates the very men who died giving him the freedom to spout this nonsense. God how this once great country has changed.

The Gaurdian,

What else?

Churchill was not a saint.....just a figure-head for WW2

Guardian :
Secrecy was paramount. Britain's imperial general staff knew there would be outrage if it became known that the government was intending to use its secret stockpile of chemical weapons. But Winston Churchill, then secretary of state for war, brushed aside their concerns.

As a long-term advocate of chemical warfare, he was determined to use them against the Russian Bolsheviks. In the summer of 1919, 94 years before the devastating strike in Syria, Churchill planned and executed a sustained chemical attack on northern Russia.

We all understand the IMMENSE part he played in securing yourfreedoms, you seemingly don't. Why is that no surprise.

Peep always trying to smear the name of Churchill.

The British were no strangers to the use of chemical weapons. During the third battle of Gaza in 1917, General Edmund Allenby had fired 10,000 cans of asphyxiating gas at enemy positions, to limited effect.

But in the final months of the first world war, scientists at the governmental laboratories at Porton in Wiltshire developed a far more devastating weapon: the top secret "M Device", an exploding shell containing a highly toxic gas called diphenylaminechloroarsine.

The man in charge of developing it, Major General Charles Foulkes, called it "the most effective chemical weapon ever devised".

Churchill was so popular he was thrown out to make way for the best British government ever 1945 , when Socialism re built Briatain

Also the Russians defeated Hitler , if that had not happened the world would have been a very different place

Absolute rubbish btw regarding the use of chemical weapons.

^ Ostrich puts his head in sand

So Churchill played no part.

No Churchill did play a part but lots of others did too

Read any of the so called reports and they'll start with 'a leaked memo' and these sweetie wives fall for it hook line and sinker.

OH dear, can't educate pork, so why bother. Byeeeeeeeeeeeee

Anti British this lot Foxy. The enemy within.

Resorting to personal abuse again crippen , a bit like your grand leader Chairman Mayo

No not anti British more anti-Tory

Crippen? Wheres his post?
BTW only person on here whos been banned for abusive posts is you anxious.

May 30, 2017 -- 9:40PM, Dr Crippen wrote:

Someone recently quoted Winston Churchill as saying “If a man is not a socialist by the time he is 20, he has no heart. If he is not a conservative by the time he is 40, he has no brain.” I think that's more like it.anxious - Sir Winston Churchill said you haven't got a brain.

Here we are

By the way Akabula how do you know what I was banned for ?

Because anxious at the time of your ban your abusive posts were mentioned.
I didn't gloat at your ban btw but you probably know that as you'd have read everyones comments on it..

Actually the ban was football related comments which in actual fact were very mild and just banter that you get all the time on there .

Im not in favour of banning anybody unless it is a very serious matter

Ditto to that.

“Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth” (Matthew 5:5).

“Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. If that's all right with the rest of you"

very true jed   Don't think it applied much back then.

Sounds like a quote from Monty Python's Life Of Brian

May 31, 2017 -- 11:39AM, jed.davison wrote:

“Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. If that's all right with the rest of you"

"Blessed are the marketmakers, for they shall inherit the exchange."

"Shut up big bank"

Funny how in a thread that brings up Stalin, one of the most horrendous brutal mass murderers humanity has ever produced but a "socialist", and Churchill, the one the lefties go after is Churchill, the man generally considered to have saved European democracy, recipient of many awards including the Nobel Prize and voted greatest Briton by a huge uk wide poll a few years ago.

Kind of sums up lefties doesn't it...

I think there is little doubt we would have lost WW2 with the current ideology in this country, if indeed we had ever gone to war in the first place.

Indeed, Corbyn and chums would be first to roll ove.

Indeed, if the choice was to fight or be overwhelmed they would mainly choose the latter, to avoid causing offence.

Repeat :

Guardian :

Secrecy was paramount. Britain's imperial general staff knew there would be outrage if it became known that the government was intending to use its secret stockpile of chemical weapons. But Winston Churchill, then secretary of state for war, brushed aside their concerns.

As a long-term advocate of chemical warfare, he was determined to use them against the Russian Bolsheviks. In the summer of 1919, 94 years before the devastating strike in Syria, Churchill planned and executed a sustained chemical attack on northern Russia.

It was a world war 70 years ago. Hoe is that of any relevence

*how