Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
30 May 17
21:26
Joined:
Date Joined:
05 May 05
The proof on here is the intolerance and disappearance of contrary opinions. see Lepard, S_H, A_T etc.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/weak-men-more-likely-to-be-socialists-study-claims-rsnc3l8mk
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/weak-men-more-likely-to-be-socialists-study-claims-rsnc3l8mk
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 56
|
By:
^ g2d again
|
|
By:
Just realised that spelled SHAT, sounds about right.
 |
|
By:
Joseph Stalin weak ?
|
|
By:
Aneirun Bevan ?
|
|
By:
btf is not bothered with all this forum bickering.....g2d is
|
|
By:
When Hitler invaded Russia Stalin had a mental breakdown.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Blair was the only strong socialist. They don't like it though.
|
|
By:
Someone recently quoted Winston Churchill as saying “If a man is not a socialist by the time he is 20, he has no heart. If he is not a conservative by the time he is 40, he has no brain.”
I think that's more like it. anxious - Sir Winston Churchill said you haven't got a brain. |
|
By:
Churchill was a good judge!
 |
|
By:
Churchill advocated the use of Gas weapons in WW1
|
|
By:
Stalin killed his own generals, and 50 million of his own subjects, are you holding him up as a figure, of socialism/commusim.
|
|
By:
.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2013/sep/01/winston-churchill-shocking-use-chemical-weapons |
|
By:
Leopard, hates Churchill, probably hates the very men who died giving him the freedom to spout this nonsense. God how this once great country has changed.
|
|
By:
The Gaurdian,
|
|
By:
What else?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Churchill was not a saint.....just a figure-head for WW2
|
|
By:
Guardian :
Secrecy was paramount. Britain's imperial general staff knew there would be outrage if it became known that the government was intending to use its secret stockpile of chemical weapons. But Winston Churchill, then secretary of state for war, brushed aside their concerns. As a long-term advocate of chemical warfare, he was determined to use them against the Russian Bolsheviks. In the summer of 1919, 94 years before the devastating strike in Syria, Churchill planned and executed a sustained chemical attack on northern Russia. |
|
By:
We all understand the IMMENSE part he played in securing yourfreedoms, you seemingly don't. Why is that no surprise.
 |
|
By:
Peep always trying to smear the name of Churchill.
|
|
By:
The British were no strangers to the use of chemical weapons. During the third battle of Gaza in 1917, General Edmund Allenby had fired 10,000 cans of asphyxiating gas at enemy positions, to limited effect.
But in the final months of the first world war, scientists at the governmental laboratories at Porton in Wiltshire developed a far more devastating weapon: the top secret "M Device", an exploding shell containing a highly toxic gas called diphenylaminechloroarsine. The man in charge of developing it, Major General Charles Foulkes, called it "the most effective chemical weapon ever devised". |
|
By:
Churchill was so popular he was thrown out to make way for the best British government ever 1945 , when Socialism re built Briatain
|
|
By:
Also the Russians defeated Hitler , if that had not happened the world would have been a very different place
|
|
By:
Absolute rubbish btw regarding the use of chemical weapons.
|
|
By:
^ Ostrich puts his head in sand
|
|
By:
So Churchill played no part.
 |
|
By:
No Churchill did play a part but lots of others did too
|
|
By:
Read any of the so called reports and they'll start with 'a leaked memo' and these sweetie wives fall for it hook line and sinker.
|
|
By:
OH dear, can't educate pork, so why bother. Byeeeeeeeeeeeee
|
|
By:
Anti British this lot Foxy. The enemy within.
|
|
By:
Resorting to personal abuse again crippen , a bit like your grand leader Chairman Mayo
|
|
By:
No not anti British more anti-Tory
|
|
By:
Crippen? Wheres his post?
BTW only person on here whos been banned for abusive posts is you anxious. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
By the way Akabula how do you know what I was banned for ?
|
|
By:
Because anxious at the time of your ban your abusive posts were mentioned.
I didn't gloat at your ban btw but you probably know that as you'd have read everyones comments on it.. |
|
By:
Actually the ban was football related comments which in actual fact were very mild and just banter that you get all the time on there .
|
|
By:
Im not in favour of banning anybody unless it is a very serious matter
|