We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
Big news. The world is quickly going down the pan.
|
|
By:
Message asking for 300 dollars. Can't call 'em greedy
![]() |
|
By:
$300? Obviously someone from the poker forum.
|
|
By:
If they're in this country should be tried for murder. If abroad a job for the SAS.
|
|
By:
My brother has his prescription delivered to the Chemist. Went to collect and it wasn't there. Someone had hacked the doctors records and had them sent to a Chemist 200 miles away where they were collected.
|
|
By:
Seems to be confusion as to whether it's 300 Bitcoin (about $430,000) or 300 dollars worth of Bitcoin.
Current reports suggest the latter. |
|
By:
'BREAKING NEWS: NHS is hit by large-scale cyber attack as computer systems and phones in hospitals across England go down as hackers demand £415,000 not to wipe files, and criminals have taken control of computers.The pop up contains a countdown clock with a deadline of next Friday'
Did someone click on a dodgy email ? Seriously, why would you attack a hospital, what is wrong with people ?! |
|
By:
It does sound like it was a dodgy email. Targeting hospitals is probably as low as you caould go but apparently, organisations other than the NHS have been attacked.
|
|
By:
NHS still using Windows XP. Air Traffic Control systems still using Windows 3.
(Although these organisations, if they pay, can still get security updates from Microsoft for these old versions.) |
|
By:
we may be back to horses and carts before we realise
|
|
By:
If GCHQ arnt all over this and catch whoever are doing it then it totally undermines both them and snoopers charter since terrorists would just do similar to evade em.
|
|
By:
40+ NHS trusts using Windows XP software.
![]() |
|
By:
I would hope that our security services find who did this. I also hope that nobody has been harmed by this but if anybody has that whoever is responsible faces the most serious charges possible.
|
|
By:
Those pesky cybermen again. Where's the doctor?
|
|
By:
dustybin 12 May 17 17:05
If GCHQ arnt all over this and catch whoever are doing it then it totally undermines both them and snoopers charter since terrorists would just do similar to evade em. ---------------- Excellent observation, and comment. |
|
By:
Heard a Podcast on this and it's virtually impossible to trace, even for Governments, usually paying up is the only option if the information is important enough (and in this case it is). All they can do is tighten the loophole but another will be found.
I think this was the episode: http://www.radiolab.org/story/darkode/ |
|
By:
The software used to attack was developed by the NSA which was stolen and placed online for all to use and all to defend against. The hackers are always one step ahead, and there'll only be an escalation of attacks in the future. Large companies and organistaions are paying millions in ransoms every day, it wasn't just the NHS today that was affected, but because it was it made the headlines. It wouldn't be a surprise to find that many critical infrastructure systems are being attacked all the time that aren't reported in the media. Seems to me digital currencies are an ideal method to launder money and have been designed for that purpose as it becomes more difficult to use traditional methods.
|
|
By:
Large companies and organistaions are paying millions in ransoms every day,
Wow, that surprises me. Do we have half a dozen or so examples? I thought this kind of attack had now become comparatively ineffective against the big boys. Cheers if you have some links. |
|
By:
Correct spelling of "your" in the ransom message... exonerates many on Chit-Chat and most from Football forum from suspicion.
![]() |
|
By:
alun2005
The research showed almost half (44%) of UK businesses have been infected by ransomware in the last 24 months. Almost a third (27%) of those more than once - with the most unlucky UK organisation targeted as much as five times. Those who have been targeted by ransomware say that a third (33%) of their employees were affected by the infection, along with an estimated 31% of the organisation’s customers. Nearly two thirds of UK businesses hit by ransomware attacks have paid up to cyber criminals. However, only 45 per cent of those who were infected got their data back, meaning that one in five companies paid up but never regained access to their files. Source: Trendmicro |
|
By:
what was wrong with paper.
power stations linked to internet? do we need all this computer stuff? microsoft should have their heads handed to them. Not keeping up with updates for their products. Billions ahead. and not looking back. |
|
By:
Thanks ooO
|
|
By:
what was wrong with paper.
My wife has a lump in her leg and it's growing. Letter was sent in January, not received, letter sent in March, not received last letter was sent last Month, it was received as it was sent registered post but she's still waiting on a date for a scan. A simple Email sent at the end of January would have cured the whole problem. Why in this day and age a Doctor has to send a letter is beyond me. There's a lot of red tape that's costing billions, I reckon the NHS still use letters to keep the Royal Mail in business. |
|
By:
Its wildly known that a large chunk of companies consider security a burden to the business and not a critical cimponent to their IT unfrastructure. This happens on a daily basis. Just because it's the nhs it now hits the news. Ransomware will evolve, users will contunue to click on whatever they like, IF will continue to be stretched and under invested in
|
|
By:
I work for a leccy company, the most important part of the business is the electricity network, this is not connected to the internet, surprised the NHS dont have an internal system like this or at least a back up version.
All of the network is connected to other computers on its own system without no outside connections. |
|
By:
$300 ? Why don't they pay it and move on.....something not right here !
|
|
By:
Is there not a case for suing Microsoft for failing to ensure its products meet security standards ? The IT world seems to regards itself as above normal product conformity and there may come a time in the future when Microsoft gets sued for the IT equivalent of PPI by millions of users,they have to stop considering themselves so aloof from the law.
|
|
By:
False Flag - Nap
|
|
By:
May desperate to declare it an International attack....."we're not at fault"
|
|
By:
More government controls on internet - NB
|
|
By:
I would think the opposite treetop, microsoft cannot protect you from the outside its just an operating system, the devil in me thinks microsoft are trying to venture into cybersecurity.
|
|
By:
I blame the Russians btw.
|
|
By:
Looks like it from this :
. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/12/global-cyber-attack-ransomware-nsa-uk-nhs |
|
By:
The NHS should have renewed their norton. cheap B^sturds
|
|
By:
Can't wait for them to hack into the general election and give UKIP a 500 seat landslide majority
|
|
By:
scotland also effected
windows 10 ? |
|
By:
Microsoft already have a security product..plus they released a patch for the vulnerability.
|
|
By:
It is all the YANKS fault - surprise, surprise -
Because their NSA failed to stop, or account for, a ROGUE releasing THEIR own HACKING CODES to the rest of the internet HACKERS. |
|
By:
Actually, regarding Microsoft, they have said anyone who patched the most recent security update wouldn't have been susceptible to this attack.
The reason OS was susceptible therefore was down to corporate decisions of no longer providing adequate security cover. Now in the case of XP there might be an argument for them to suggest they were no longer responsible to do so since the promoted coverage date has lapsed...but since their decision to pull the security updates for the newest technology that use kabylake processors and not using Windows 10 OS (the one that uses telemetry a la Google to sell your data) then those machines have arbitrarily been placed in danger while still within the agreed servicing period for the purchased software (in win 7 case it's still got 3 years to go) Ergo, anyone who purchased Windows 7 and installed it onto a new machine in the belief they would be covered for security but then get attacked because the adequate security patch was denied them purely for reasons of forcing further purchase of a product that has spying capabilities and low market share may have an interesting question to ask... |