|
By:
adam boulton - bunter ha ha!!!
|
|
By:
She's a protest vote at best, all elections are won from centre ground in countries like France, pipe dream for the nutters to think she'd win.
|
|
By:
True.
|
|
By:
ps
Macron - (on sky) being described as an organic movement - sounds like having a Sh!t - and that about sums him up really. |
|
By:
You would have to be an idiot not to vote for Le Pen, don`t allow yourself to believe anything else.
|
|
By:
26 points behind in the polls
|
|
By:
Looks like Le Pen is extremely unlikely to get in. Thankfully the French voters will show themselves to be not as stupid as the British and American and another disaster can be avoided.
|
|
By:
Yes anxious, Le Pen is an idealist and a romantic . She is like a teacher and a reminder of all that is good,
She seems unapproachable, a sort of goddess. There is more to it than that of course. |
|
By:
A bit like her Dad ?
|
|
By:
The French people are a bit afraid , and a bit not afraid .
|
|
By:
getting to the final 2 has been a good result for le pen,she already said that her time will be in 5 years time when presumably the terrorist situation will have worsened & macron will not have been able to improve the economic malaise caused by eu stagnation.
|
|
By:
Lots can change in 5 years but those who thought 3-1 this time around were fair odds clearly didnt understand French politics.
|
|
By:
Lots can change in 2 weeks as well.
And don't get me started on polls... |
|
By:
What exactly is the 'organic movement' of macron going to do?
They describe it as organic - sounds like having a sh!t - bit like his policies. A progressive. Ex Rothschild and 5 years with Hollande? how does that work out as a progressive. On sky they are talking him up as fast as they can go with 'Bunter' fronting it all. Hardly anything good to say about pen and really not doing a critique on the progessive's policy. Looks more like one step forward and 2 steps back. What gets my goat is the lack of any proper analysis of policies and the avoidance of serious discussion of the policies and problems. ADULT UNEMPLOYMENT,THE HORRENDOUS YOUTH JOB SITUATION, IMMIGRATION and the M problem. |
|
By:
He's done nothing, knows nothing, can't promise anything, has no plans, and Le Pen will wipe him out in a debate.
7's is tooooooooo big.. |
|
By:
Le Penn
on ur bucket list g2d ? |
|
By:
It's a big bucket, Cap'n..
|
|
By:
driver2 - sadly you're right. Both Melenchon and Fillon have told their voters to back Macron in the second round next month, so it looks extremely unlikely that Le Pen will win.
|
|
By:
Are these voters mere puppets, to do as they are told? I doubt it will be as straighforward as the media would have us believe.
|
|
By:
Correctomundo.
As for driver. He said earlier that "4.6 will not look too shabby in a 2 horse race" and later says "Le Pen on offer at 7s for the guessers" I've been doing it wrong all along.. |
|
By:
lfc1971 24 Apr 17 10:25
You would have to be an idiot not to vote for Le Pen chit chat 2017 |
|
By:
guinness2dear 24 Apr 17 22:57
As for driver. He said earlier that "4.6 will not look too shabby in a 2 horse race" you have, selectively and possibly typically, failed to apply context to this original statement. |
|
By:
What a contradictory eejit.
Have a look at your previous cherry picking.. |
|
By:
please explain why you have taken driver's comment out of context
should be simple enough for someone as intelligent as you |
|
By:
And just to help the convo along...
you have, selectively and possibly typically, failed to apply context to this original statement. should be simple enough for someone as intelligent as you |
|
By:
David Fishwick Minibus Sales 24 Apr 17 23:47
should be simple enough for someone as intelligent as you guinness2dear 24 Apr 17 23:53 It isn't. i overestimated your intelligence (sarcastically or not) guinness2dear 24 Apr 17 23:53 Now you explain why you took lfc's comment out of context you sniping twot.. i didn't -- proof of my overestimation (above) |
|
By:
You did; i know what he meant; you didn't. Overestimation of your intelligence metinks.
As you are the one who came on here and sniped at me (sarcastically or not) would you care to explain your behaviour? |
|
By:
guinness2dear 24 Apr 17 23:18
Have a look at your previous cherry picking.. until you provide proof of said cherry picking (go on then), this is merely an opinion and not fact. oh, and calm down snowflake. |
|
By:
I'm very calm, snowflake. Now if you would, answer my question please..
|
|
By:
i asked if you'd care to explain why you took driver's comment(s) out of context -- you wouldn't (because you did), or couldn't (because you did and don't have the capacity for reason)
my behaviour is on a reasoned level. i requested an explanation (re: you being selective in the use of somebody else's comments) but you refused to answer. you have since sought to divert/distract from my original request. it's a typical response and one i'm used to outwith online discussion. |
|
By:
I answered. More than you did, or can't or won't.
Your behaviour is on stalker level as you have given no reason for choosing to protect driver and snipe at me. Driver, i assume is big enough to look after himself? There is many posts and posters you could have chosen. Which means (just to help you) that you chose me in particular. You see, you "requested an explanation" which means you think you're superior to members of this Forum (online) as anyone can see. I have answered your snipes and just because i don't want to converse with you in detail (reasons above) i chose short answers to a sniper... Now you in your mother superior role may see that as deflection; i can assure you it isn't. I just like brushing your snipes off my sleeve with a one or two word flick.. Maybe you're Alastair Campbell and just act superior all the time. Maybe you're just a sniping twot. Either way you chose me in particular. Maybe i should feel honoured (i am bowing) in your presence? |
|
By:
guinness2dear 25 Apr 17 00:35
I answered. -- you didn't (still not explained why you selectively chose only part of his/her post). More than you did, or can't or won't. -- your question was about behaviour, i replied. Your behaviour is on stalker level -- it isn't. your opinion, not fact. as you have given no reason for choosing to protect driver and snipe at me. -- i have done neither (your choice of the word "snipe" is your perception of this online discourse). you took his comments out of context -- you've still not answered why. Driver, i assume is big enough to look after himself? -- I'm sure he/she is. There is many posts and posters you could have chosen. Which means (just to help you) that you chose me in particular. -- you've misrepresented another poster's comments. simply, why? You see, you "requested an explanation" which means you think you're superior to members of this Forum (online) as anyone can see. I have answered your snipes and just because i don't want to converse with you in detail (reasons above) i chose short answers to a sniper... -- i don't; can they?; you haven't; i am not. Now you in your mother superior role may see that as deflection; i can assure you it isn't. I just like brushing your snipes off my sleeve with a one or two word flick.. -- genius or waffle Maybe you're Alastair Campbell and just act superior all the time. Maybe you're just a sniping twot. Either way you chose me in particular. Maybe i should feel honoured (i am bowing) in your presence? -- neither Campbell nor sniping |
|
By:
Well at least you agree you're a twot.
I did answer your question mother. Just because you don't like the answer means nothing. And i explained why it was short which imo was more than you deserve. As previously stated by my good and simple self. There are many posts and posters you could have chosen (i'm sure a superior being like yerself, Alastair could find fault with many) you chose MINE I have been stalked by many these last months and you're just another; or maybe just another guise. Whether you deny it or not is immaterial to me. You post exactly like 2 others on here. If i picked unfairly (i didn't just to help) on driver then it's up to him to respond, not you mother. This is a Forum not a day care centre. No one ever intervenes on my behalf and nor would i want them to.. I don't care how superior you think you are, you're not. You're just a condescending twot. I have proven you sniped; just because you don't like it means nothing. And you still could be Campbell, or maybe you carry his bag? I don't think i've typed 5 words to you in all the time i've been on here so your snipes to me tonight for no apparent reason other than your superiority complex; tells me all i need to know. Well of course there's always this to remind us all... you have, selectively and possibly typically, failed to apply context to this original statement. This implies you know how i post. It also reminds me of recently when it was said to me on here by someone else; or maybe not eh. Selectively is a great word; you should practice what you preach, mother. Maybe you can explain it's true meaning to your liturgy this coming Sunday? |
|
By:
guinness2dear 25 Apr 17 01:56
my simple self you have proved nothing other than a willingness to hurl insults (the last resort and indicator of failure in debate) intentionally ignoring context and not addressing a direct question as to why is in no way an answer (it's impossible to dislike what doesn't exist). surely, you understood the quite explicit use of "possibly"? |
|
By:
Hurl insults? Now that does make me laugh. My hound could hurl them better than i have tonight. But if ye fancy some proper insults, you child, i will gladly hurl some when i've got the time or inclination..
Everything i have said about you is true (have a look in the mirror, mother) You are a condescending prat who thinks he is superior to your average Joe. It's written and smells all over your posts. What gives you that impression is beyond me. Maybe you were spoilt as a child? Dropped on yer napper? Who knows. All i know is you couldn't have had a decent education as thy ended up in Burnley selling used cars. Tut. Now for the last time mother; i answered your question!!! Unlike you with mine. I understand "possibly and typically (i think you forgot that one)" in this particular context, as a sarcastic remark said to try and get a rise out of my good self (someone been teaching you) You will have to report back and tell them you failed miserably.. Oh btw; your last answer was cherry picked as well. You really need to improve your sniping. As at the moment, you are behind crabs. Now that's embarrassing.. |