Oldham head teacher forced to work from home

Should we be shocked? this IS WHATS COMING! as the muslim population increases fast, they will demand Sharia Law and all this that goes with it, idiots on here like Facts and Breedingmad are so ignorant of the FACTS!

Even the most hardened leftie liberal would find this difficult to justify

Tdoridoru    19 Feb 17 18:24 
Should we be shocked? this IS WHATS COMING! as the muslim population increases fast, they will demand Sharia Law and all this that goes with it, idiots on here like Facts and Breedingmad are so ignorant of the FACTS

!

No need to shout !

The pressure is on everywhere. As the numbers grow so will the demands.  You are already seeing the infiltration into politics but, just as important, the legal profession.

If I sent my children to a local school I would expect them to be educated in the style/culture to which I am accustomed.
That's all the muslim parents are pressing for. 

cough cough!!!

Twiz

Comment on a Daily Mail story ? Where do I begin .... !

Read it then comment...not to much to ask( stick a clothes peg on your nose if you must)

It's bad enough reading what gets posted on here..
I draw the line at having to read anything related to the Daily Mail.

P.s note to myself.
Stop opening up Chit Chat Forum

Please can i have that as a gospel...PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE

If you supply the music.

TBF the Gusrdian have also covered this story in tomorrow's edition
14 across "Northern town where headmaster may have received death threats (6)

Check out Sarah Haider on U-Tube especially the one titled"Your hurt feelings mean nothing"

a school in england with nearly 100% muslim students is scary enough even before we get to the death threats, fecking inbreds breed like rabbits

Facts 19 Feb 17 19:14 Joined: 05 May 03 | Topic/replies: 23,968 | Blogger: Facts's blog

It's bad enough reading what gets posted on here..
I draw the line at having to read anything related to the Daily Mail.

P.s note to myself.
Stop opening up Chit Chat Forum


Oh dear, ANOTHER unfortunate inaccuracy from FACTS.

A few days ago on the thread entitled 'FOUR ROOMS', he typed :

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3249693/TV-property-expert-hair-pulling-catfight-yacht-club-Women-accused-brawling-husbands-started-row.html.

Class !!!

So, he DOES get information from the Daily Mail after all. What on earth will his lefty chums make of him? This is normally seen as some sort of wickedness on a massive scale.

The tawdry evidence can be seen in glorious technicolour at :

.
http://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30821317/four-rooms42?pg=1


Dear oh dear, poor old IAN has had a nightmare. Publicly exposed as getting info from the Daily Mail online website, AND contradicting himself in the most humiliating manner possible.

Ye Gods, he'll be telling us next that he didn't actually share his home with Syrian 'Refugees' after all.

omfg thats the most severe ownage ive seen in a while

is facts the guy who did a stan collymore and claimed he would take the refugees into his home and then renege?!?!

The funniest thing Grant is that he also pretends that he doesn't read my postings, pretending that he's 'blocked' me……. 'blocking'…..the cyberspace equivalent of a child hiding under the bed, fingers in ears, screaming 'NOOOOOOOOOOOO' as if he's just discovered his favourite Winnie-the-Pooh cereal dish has been smashed.


A few weeks ago on a thread about the TV series 'Taboo' I asked a question about one aspect of the plot. Guess who answered it? The very bloke who has 'blocked' my postings,  poor old IAN himself.

Relive this wonderful moment at :

.
http://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30781033/taboo---915pm-bbc1---tom-hardy?origpost_id=550865251&pg=2

Grant, yes he's declined to answer the MANY questions the Chit Chat/Politics Forumites have asked him over the last 18 months about the Refugees he said he would share his home with. Apparently it was 'the only moral and humanitarian thing to do'. Anyone who didn't was apparently 'narrow'.

He's also declined to tell us how many Refugees from previous international conflicts in war-torn countries that he has accommodated and subsidised at his own expense, and (for example) how many UK Homeless people he's also given a home to. The latter group of course one of THE great Sacred Cow groups for the British Left.

facts sounds like a classic virtue signaller

Facts getting pocketed on here tonight. N1 Alun.

Great stuff alun....quite made my day reading that and its only ten past eight

Digdeep...couldn't find that You tube vid...link please?

Feb 20, 2017 -- 12:44AM, alun2005 wrote:

Grant, yes he's declined to answer the MANY questions the Chit Chat/Politics Forumites have asked him over the last 18 months about the Refugees he said he would share his home with. Apparently it was 'the only moral and humanitarian thing to do'. Anyone who didn't was apparently 'narrow'. He's also declined to tell us how many Refugees from previous international conflicts in war-torn countries that he has accommodated and subsidised at his own expense, and (for example) how many UK Homeless people he's also given a home to. The latter group of course one of THE great Sacred Cow groups for the British Left.

Alun.....you are starting to sound like one of those parrots which keeps repeating some nonsense over and over.

You know that Facts was only showing his support for refugees who may have come from terrible lives.

He probably doesn't have room to accommodate any lodgers and at his age does not want the hassle.

You often come up with some amusing posts, why don't you go back to being funny instead of obsessing on this irrelevancy.

You are getting very boring !

its their life leopard

reading right wing websites, watching right wing videos

then expecting normal folk to agree with their ranting when
they put them on here

many rich people with spare rooms, Geldof, Diane forget her second name, others?

of course they may not want to, just as some do not want them to come to this country, is there a difference? I don't know

I don't mind if Facts doesn't answer, sometimes the question is more important than the answer.

Feb 20, 2017 -- 10:07AM, donny osmond wrote:

its their life leopardreading right wing websites, watching right wing videosthen expecting normal folk to agree with their ranting whenthey put them on here

Yes, they do not realise that they are damaging their minds continually focusing on an unleavened diet of hate-speak.

we should not expect anyone to invite a complete stranger into their own house, why?, it might be dangerous.

Donny - i'll think you'll find most normal agree with Alun and not you.

most ?

when did 20-30% become most

Famous rich people making assertions which subsequently they do not back up with action are fair game to be held to account.

Alun2005,
just accept that lefties are a bit thick.

I have and it makes life more entertaining ... their illogic, inability to marshal a structured argument, their obfuscation, their inconsistencies, selective memories, biased interpretation of history.

I meet very few in real life these days but when I did, they were always thickos, full of self entitlement and angst.

Generally they are thick - that's why they're socialists.

I said normal people, not left wing fools who will ruin the future for our kids and grandkids.

yeah, and i pointed out thats still only 20-30%

Blackrock, not a chance for the loonies to ruin the future.

Normal people have woken up at last - in the UK, States and across mainland Europe.

The left are, well left, but now well left behind.  Bye, bye, fools.

https://youtu.be/WoZ4wc344sI  Try this Twizzle

Don't bother takes you somewhere else. I just go on u-tube and put her name on search and up she comes .

So FACTS reads the Daily Mail?

I always thought he was a bad lot.

He'll deny reading the Daily Mail for enjoyment, just reading it for research purposes.

Like that odious Pete Townshend who downloaded child porn to prove banks were complicit in something or other.