Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 64 comments are related to the topic:
Rolf Harris paintings?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 64
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Feb 17 11:26
there is a difference between someone who creates and someone who copies
A brilliant violinist will play a piece of music by Mozart, it is difficult to do not many people can do it.
But the notes are there, someone had to create those notes, that takes genius.

In  the same way in a great painting someone has to write those notes.
By:
Foinavon
When: 20 Feb 17 11:32
Many artists do both. Copying others is a way to improve your knowledge and techniques but we all do original stuff too. It's for others to judge if it's any good.
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Feb 17 11:35
all artists copy and learn from others, that is difficult and enjoyable.
but it is a craft, not art.
By:
dustybin
When: 20 Feb 17 11:41
That's why I have sympathy for the artist that was forged and not for the person who was conned into believing it was real.
Since the value must lie in the amount YOU would pay for something, not in how much you can sell it for.
By:
Foinavon
When: 20 Feb 17 11:45
all artists copy and learn from others, that is difficult and enjoyable.
but it is a craft, not art.

I don't think anyone would dispute that lfc
By:
Foinavon
When: 20 Feb 17 11:52
There are grey areas, where someone takes something or an image which already exists and presents it in a new way. Warhol's Marilyns for example or his paintings of soup cans. What about Duchamp's "fountain"? Is it art? Apparently so.
By:
Foinavon
When: 20 Feb 17 12:00
If I paint a picture of my grandson using a photograph sent to me by my daughter, is it art, or craft? If I take the photo myself and use that, is it any different? Is the work of celebrated photographers art? What they are photographing is already there, they are just creating an image of it using a camera.
By:
dustybin
When: 20 Feb 17 12:10
Photography would be artistic in the sense of use of composition based on an acquired skill that was learned from observation.
Its a very weak one though, made for today's generation entirely.
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Feb 17 12:41
consider the Punk Rock group the Sex Pistols. they were not technically particularly good. There were thousands of better guitarists.
But from the opening chords of GSTQ, or Pretty Vacant and Johnny Rottens vocals you knew you were hearing something beautiful and unique and something that no other group could produce.
could any other country in the world have produced the Sex Pistols other than England?
no I don't think so, only England.
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Feb 17 12:44
some great painters painted from photographs,Maurice Utrillo is one of my favourite  artists and he did this often
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Feb 17 12:53
so the question is how do you know it`s a Utrillo if it`s painted from a photograph?
the answer is you only have to look at it, no one else could have made that painting
it`s Utrillo, the painting is in his style, someone else may have been more technically good at painting from the photograph..so what? that doesn't matter.
what matters is that when you look at Utrillo`s painting you know it is by him.
By:
Foinavon
When: 20 Feb 17 13:10
Was it John Lennon who said, when asked about Ringo Starr, "He's not even the best drummer in the Beatles".

I think you have to make use of available techniques as appropriate. Photographs are useful when painting portraits, especially children who have difficulty keeping still for any length of time. For outdoor painting, the light and shadows can change dramatically, or the tide can come in if by the sea. Photographs help you "freeze" the moment so you can keep your picture consistent. Before photography, some artists used "Camera obscura", Canaletto being known to use it for his "busy" landscapes. I don't think anyone copies photos exactly if you don't add something then it's not worth painting it, just frame the photo.
By:
dustybin
When: 20 Feb 17 13:19
There are some more modern artists who weren't/ aren't brilliant draughtsmen, Lowry for one, but I don't consider them to be great artists.

Ive literally just got off the phone to my old man who had been on a break in salford and was told he went to the Lowry museum and he said it was 5hit, 'thats not art that' says he. ExcitedLaugh
By:
Foinavon
When: 20 Feb 17 13:22
He couldn't draw dogs or horses that's for sure. Cry
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Feb 17 17:14
Lowry was a great artist, not everyone will understand why, they don't have the facility for it.
By:
Foinavon
When: 20 Feb 17 17:21
You are entitled to your opinion lfc, there's no need to be patronising.
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Feb 17 19:56
yes sorry Foinavon, I didn't really mean it that way and wasn't referring to anyone in particular
I meant that it`s a bit like saying I don`t understand e=mc2, I don`t, not really. But I`m not going to then say its not a real or true or beautiful formula just because I don't understand it
By:
Foinavon
When: 20 Feb 17 20:05
That's OK lfc, let's not get into physics, art is difficult enough Happy
By:
cardifffc
When: 20 Feb 17 20:38
a woman bought a load of his paintings for good money..........think they told her they were worthless
By:
akabula
When: 20 Feb 17 23:59
Foinavon
That's OK lfc, let's not get into physics, art is difficult enough


I don't think it is foinavon for the vast majority of people including myself.
To me I look at something and either like it or not.
I used to visit the Kelvingrove museum a lot and spent most of my time looking at the paintings.
I can see though that someone like yourself, ie an artist, looks beyond that.
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 21 Feb 17 00:32
one of GLASGOWS jewels is the kelvingrove aka.   Happy
By:
akabula
When: 21 Feb 17 00:40
Unbelievable place GC, love it.
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 21 Feb 17 00:48
bit depressing for some but this funeral painting is one of my favs from the museum....bit too big to put under my coat. Happy

   https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/a-funeral-service-in-the-highlands-84325
By:
Foinavon
When: 21 Feb 17 12:24
An excellent painting. Guthrie painted some more cheerful scenes which I would prefer to hang on my wall, (if I could afford them).
By:
Foinavon
When: 21 Feb 17 12:33
I do have an interest in physics too Aka. Happy. Science provided my bread and butter, art is a lifelong hobby.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com