Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
donny osmond
19 Jan 17 11:29
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Mar 08
| Topic/replies: 85,197 | Blogger: donny osmond's blog
The BBC broke accuracy and impartiality rules in a News at Six report about Jeremy Corbyn's view on shoot-to-kill, the BBC's governing body has said.
The item, by BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg, was shown three days after the Paris attacks in November 2015.
A viewer complained that the report misrepresented the Labour leader's position on the use of lethal force in the event of such an attack in the UK.
BBC News director James Harding said he disagreed with the BBC Trust's ruling.
In the News at Six report, Kuenssberg said she had asked Mr Corbyn "if he were the resident here at Number 10 whether or not he would be happy for British officers to pull the trigger in the event of a Paris-style attack".
He was seen to reply: "I am not happy with a shoot to kill policy in general. I think that is quite dangerous and I think can often be counter-productive."
The actual question Kuenssberg had asked during the interview was: "If you were prime minister, would you be happy to order people - police or military - to shoot to kill on Britain's streets?"
The previous question in the interview, in a section that was not used on the News At Six, he had been asked specifically about his response to a Paris-style attack if he was prime minister and whether he would "order security services onto the street to stop people being killed".
In answer to that question, Mr Corbyn had replied: "Of course you'd bring people onto the streets to prevent and ensure there is safety within our society."
The BBC Trust said the BBC "was wrong in this case to present an answer Mr Corbyn had given to a question about 'shoot to kill' as though it were his answer to a question he had not in fact been asked".
The Trust said the Paris attacks, and how Britain might respond in a similar situation, were "major matters of considerable importance".
It also said: "The breach of due accuracy on such a highly contentious political issue meant that the output had not achieved due impartiality."
But the Trust found no evidence that there was a deliberate attempt to mislead audiences and noted that the full interview had been published on the BBC website.
The complaint did not come from Mr Corbyn or anyone acting on his behalf.
'Outstanding journalist'
James Harding, director of BBC News said: "While we respect the Trust and the people who work there, we disagree with this finding.
"Laura is an outstanding journalist and political editor with the utmost integrity and professionalism. BBC News reported on the leader of the opposition in the same way it would any other politician.
"It is striking that the Trust itself said there was 'no evidence of bias'. Indeed, it also said the news report was 'compiled in good faith'.
"The process is now concluded and BBC News formally notes the Trust's finding."
The BBC said the complaint had been looked at on four other occasions and each time had been rejected.


bbc.co.uk



surely there is enough material on mr corbyn without Laura stitching him up
in this manner

it seems as if she is out of control !
Pause Switch to Standard View Laura Kuenssberg report on Jeremy...
Show More
Loading...
Report anxious January 19, 2017 11:58 AM GMT
Kuenssberg is well know to hate Labour and Jeremy , further evidence of tory bias at the BBC
Report salmon spray January 19, 2017 12:12 PM GMT
I'm not a great Corbyn fan but Kuenssberg is NOT impartial. I have complained myself and got the usual stock reply but I am now watching her like a hawk. One foot wrong and I am reporting her to Betfair. That should make sure she disappears.     Cool
Report lfc1971 January 19, 2017 2:49 PM GMT
You can't get a straight answer from that **** Corbyn , bound to be misunderstandings.
Report anxious January 19, 2017 3:33 PM GMT
He is more honest than One nation theresa
Report Wesdag January 19, 2017 3:36 PM GMT
But more deluded.
Report Petraco January 19, 2017 4:20 PM GMT
No wonder the licence fee is as high as it is if they have to have five inquiries over one incident such as this.

Does anyone know exactly how many are riding this particular gravy train?  Plain
Report Platini January 19, 2017 4:38 PM GMT
Don't like Laura's politics


but I do like her Love
Report bigmo January 19, 2017 4:48 PM GMT
salmon spray Laugh
Report The Leopard January 19, 2017 5:58 PM GMT

Jan 19, 2017 -- 12:12PM, salmon spray wrote:


I'm not a great Corbyn fan but Kuenssberg is NOT impartial. I have complained myself and got the usual stock reply but I am now watching her like a hawk. One foot wrong and I am reporting her to Betfair. That should make sure she disappears.     


I think you mean TSE Global Confused

Report not allowed to bet January 19, 2017 7:01 PM GMT
Platini is about to be cancelled

however - I would too!! slurp
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com