Hillary Winning by 2.5m Votes

Certainly is when the result isnt the one you wanted. At least we know the rules before the event.

Trump has received more votes than any other Republican candidate in history.

Your backside

Yeah , it's like a Championship club finishing 3rd and complaining when they lose in the play offs. It's not like they moved the goalposts.

The electoral college was expected to favour Hilary , 'the blue firewall' etc

amazing how the systems at fault when it doesn't suit

UK General Election 2015

SNP & Lib Dems combined vote 3.83 million votes - 64 seats

UKIP 3.88 million votes - 1 seat

DO we also have a joke system?

uk system is a joke also

too many democrats moved to california

(nap)

Yet the remoaners were on the wrong side of the popular vote in the brexit poll, and they aren't happy about that either.

She should stand again in 2020.

Yep, i need a laugh..

TheBetterBettor  • December 1, 2016 9:28 PM GMT 


She should stand again in 2020.

She would have a job standing without a zimmer frame, let alone standing for President!

She had her chance, she wont stand again.

Vote will be over-turned on recount.

if she was 60 she would stand again but will be too old next time..........thats how much she thinks of herself, she would force herself on the world again.

Leop, i did not think you were so stupid

Will there be a recount on the recount?

And if so

How many recounts are required before a count is no longer recounted?

the 2016 election was very interesting but 2020 will be insane...........will donny boy run? and if he does who will the democrats put up against him...........

Eg

She would have a job standing without a zimmer frame, let alone standing for President!

She had her chance, she wont stand again.




So on that basis if she'd won, then standing for re-election would be a 'no no' because she's too old


Trump's older than her....on your judgement would he be a one term president?

The popular vote is irrelevant really. Everyone knew the rules when they were campaigning.

Had the two candidates known it was just the popular vote then they would have campaigned differently in different places. Clinton won by 4 million votes in california alone. If the election was settled on most votes the candidates would spend more time campaigning in the most popular states and less time in the crucial swing states.

There would also have been voters in states where the outcome was never in doubt who didnt bother to vote as it was pointless who may have voted in a situation where it was most votes. e.g trump supporters in california or clinton supporters in republican strongholds.

correct, imo mighty

popular vote means nothing its winning the whitehouse that matters

You can pot more balls in a snooker match and still lose the match.

The rules determine the tactical plan as Mighty White alludes to.

my main point is that this aint a revolution like some people are talking about............how can it be a revolution when your opponent gets 2% more than u.

donny boy is handing out social welfare to american companies to stop them going to mexico...........if a democrat did that OMG.............THOSE DAMN COMMUNISTS INTERFERING WITH CAPITALISM...........

worse system in our country - we voted on proportional representation and the idiots voted no... because they made it sound complicated.

600 seats in parliament.

50 percent voted Tory
40 percent labour
10 percent other twaats.

means 300 seats tory, 240 labour, 60 other mutates.

then they look at which constituencies voted the most tory. they become tory seats. then they look at the higher amount per proportion of the vote ?

simple - give me the job... it's basic arithmetic.

the Wisconsin recount is finished and the woman from the Green Party was correct in her beliefs that Hilary's vote was inaccurate. So I have to apologise to her and admit she was right, I'm also sure Hilary will be pleased with one single extra vote it has now given her.

i thought trump had taken out an injunction to stop the recount

they expected to finnish counting 3 million votes on 12th dec ?

yes DO it was in big letters but when you read the story closely it is just one county ah well she only needs another 22000

i dont know what he is scared of

he was going to challenge result if he lost , now he doesnt want it challenged
or even just audited.

its like a plot from heroes

The Don needs to chill this woman admitted she just wants publicity for the Greens, she doesn't even know if there has been anything untoward happening.

its a very expensive fishing trip by the greens

or at least appears to be

TheBetterBettor  • December 1, 2016 11:46 PM GMT 


Eg

She would have a job standing without a zimmer frame, let alone standing for President!

She had her chance, she wont stand again.
So on that basis if she'd won, then standing for re-election would be a 'no no' because she's too old Crazy
Trump's older than her....on your judgement would he be a one term president?

I think Trump would do two terms if he was elected.

I think if Clinton had been elected she should have tried to.

The thing is Clinton was defeated so I doubt she will get another chance.
If they went for a women again, probably be Michelle Obama, unless another rises to Democratic prominence.

Perhaps the zimmer frame comment was a bit naughty