Comedy Gold - LibTard crowd laughing at Donald Trump prediction by AC

43 SECONDS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfy0FNOmmaI

sanders was the best candidate but killary and her own party with the backing of the media put an end to any hint of socialism

George Sorus is funding Sir Donald protestors..

http://humanevents.com/2011/04/02/top-10-reasons-george-soros-is-dangerous/

shoo-in

wheres the riots on the streets in this country then let down by camerons sunny uplands which cant even be seen with a telescope after 6 years of cameron and gideon, i very much doubt that trump will prove a bigger disappointment to his most fervent supporters than obama was to his

and of course as with brexit you can bet your bottom dollar with a turnout of 55% at least half of these protestors so concerned about the prospect of trump getting in they didn't bother to vote

my colleagues on the left have really screwed up by trying to silence any debate and frightening off some of those who want a debate by crying xenophobe, little englander, racist and misogynist
People have questions and want a debate but the liberal(ha ha) and left refused to have one and people have kept their thoughts to themselves and voted against the dictatorship of the lib/left who want to silence any protest. But as soon as it goes wrong THEY want to protest - some violently

the left etc need to face the questions and argue on open forums to show the right their ideas are wrong

you won't get anywhere by screaming at them - insulting and blaming them - talking down to them etc

They are helped by the whole of tv media who do not want these debates as it does not suit their agenda.  I have never seen so much bias in the eu elections, ukip, farage, corbyn/cooper, corbyn/chemical smith, and lastly trump  yet in every case it has gone to those we must not mention ho ho!!  The frightening thing is they STILL don't get it and the propaganda continues.  There is little or no balance AT ALL on tv media.

Crags,
Do more research.
Don't just stop at the one that gives you the answer that you want.
I did.
HTH

while my liberal and left friends continue to laugh and denigrate corbyn, farage, trump and brexit , they will not be addressing the issues which electorates and party members want to debate

mememe, I've looked at your reference and it's nonsense.

How long is your seethe going to last?

BBC news seethe. Corbyn outraged by the 'xenophobic' Trump.

The next story is about the Muslim terrorist attacks in Paris.

You can't make this stuff up. Wake up and smell the bullets..

Aye ye all ready for this?

CNN now saying Sir Donald has Klu Klux Clan involvement They are re-doing his apparent links with David Dook. This is all because some non-white fookwit is shouting racism at every opportunity. Pathetic childish chip on shoulder BEATEN lefty nobrots..

Any epic seethes today from the States?

MORONS REACT TO TRUMP WINNING

Paul Joseph Watson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXpi3F0E5ro

Poor defeated lefties still screaming like wet nappied 3 week olds on ere - diddums...

BBC still seething goodo,a very special seethe indeed, appalled that Sir Donald wants the bould Nigel to be an ambassador and represent the country of the UK but also their lopsided showing of Donald not pursuing a threat of bringing Clinton to justice (for whatever) when all knew it was only halfbaked elections handbags.

Haha. In all seriousness i think they as an impartial corporation are doing their best to wreck "relations" between the 2 countries,it seems as if Sir Donald is miles ahead though.

Good evening G2d,

I felt compelled to bring your thread up again,it was an excruciating 6.00 news.they even got an interview with an ex British/US ambassador,he was so full of of his own self ex importance he was totally aghast that talk was for Nige getting his gig.
He was wearing a fur collared crombie though as well.

Surely the common sense is for Britain to be with someone who seems allied to them particulary in light of brexit and not to have the news agencies/media doing their utmost to scupper that?

And on and on and on and on.........


The Guardian previously disclosed that a loose coalition of academics and activists concerned about the election’s security is preparing to deliver a report detailing its concerns to congressional committee chairs and federal authorities early next week, according to two people involved.

“I’m interested in verifying the vote,” said Dr Barbara Simons, an adviser to the US election assistance commission and expert on electronic voting. “We need to have post-election ballot audits.” Simons is understood to have contributed analysis to the effort but declined to characterise the precise nature of her involvement.

A second group of analysts, led by the National Voting Rights Institute founder John Bonifaz and Professor Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan’s center for computer security and society, is also taking part in the push for a review.

In a blogpost earlier on Wednesday, Halderman said paper ballots and voting equipment should be examined in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. “Unfortunately, nobody is ever going to examine that evidence unless candidates in those states act now, in the next several days, to petition for recounts,” he said.

Clinton’s defeat to Donald Trump followed the release by US intelligence agencies of public assessments that Russian hackers were behind intrusions into regional electoral computer systems and the theft of emails from Democratic officials before the election.

Curiosity about Wisconsin has centred on apparently disproportionate wins that were racked up by Trump in counties using electronic voting compared with those that used only paper ballots.

Use of the voting machines that are in operation in some Wisconsin counties has been banned in other states, including California, after security analysts repeatedly showed how easily they could be hacked into.