Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 151 comments are related to the topic:
Come on The Donald
Come on The Donald
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 151
|
By:
Yes, Ron. There was a conspiracy 41 years ago to get Hillary elected as President.
|
|
By:
Media being told, if you support Trump your career is done here.
Big News organisations warning smaller set ups to destroy Trump how corrupt / bent is this ffs |
|
By:
The email purportedly from Hillary Clinton to Robert Russo (released by Wikileaks today) is rather embarrassing. Probably wise to reserve judgement until it's authenticated, of course, but Obama's reaction in particular will be interesting if it's genuine.
|
|
By:
The 1975 case where Hilary made her legal debut, you said that it had already been proven to be incorrect (on the other fred)
|
|
By:
I doubt IS will be back but just in case... I really have to go to bed. I'm not avoiding you.
If you manage to come up with something I called false, I'll deal with it in the morning. Assuming MY thread is still here! |
|
By:
Ah, he's back.
WTF are you talking about? What exactly did I say was incorrect? |
|
By:
The only thing I said was incorrect was virtually every utterance about the case made by that utter tnuc Paul Joseph Watson.
|
|
By:
you are hard work, i have every fred saved on here.
You said; 'that has already been proven to be false' re a response after a ron link to HC laughing at a rapist conviction. Clearly you may have been replying to a different reply. |
|
By:
I did NOT say that. As you have every thread saved, I look forward to seeing you reproduce it.
This link was posted by somebody else, who I'm pretty sure is anti-Hillary. Feel free to disprove their damning findings... http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/ FULL QUESTION Did Hillary Clinton volunteer to defend a child rapist in 1975, accuse the 12-year-old victim of fantasizing about older men, later state that she knew he was guilty but got the charges dropped and laugh? FULL ANSWER In 1975, Hillary Clinton — then known as Hillary Rodham — taught at the University of Arkansas School of Law, where she founded the University of Arkansas School Legal Aid Clinic. It was during this time that she defended Thomas Alfred Taylor, a 41-year-old man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl. In her book “Living History,” Clinton recalls that Mahlon Gibson, a Washington County prosecutor, told her that the accused rapist “wanted a woman lawyer” to defend him, and that Gibson had recommended Clinton to Judge Maupin Cummings. “I told Mahlon I really didn’t feel comfortable taking on such a client, but Mahlon gently reminded me that I couldn’t very well refuse the judge’s request.” Gibson corroborated Clinton’s story in a 2014 interview with CNN. CNN, June 25, 2014: Gibson said Clinton called him shortly after the judge assigned her to the case and said, “I don’t want to represent this guy. I just can’t stand this. I don’t want to get involved. Can you get me off?” “I told her, ‘Well contact the judge and see what he says about it,’ but I also said don’t jump on him and make him mad,” Gibson said. “She contacted the judge and the judge didn’t remove her and she stayed on the case.” In a separate 2014 interview, Clinton said she had an “obligation” to represent Taylor. “I had a professional duty to represent my client to the best of my ability, which I did,” she said. In her book, Clinton writes that she visited Taylor in the county jail and he “denied the charges against him and insisted that the girl, a distant relative, had made up her story.” Clinton filed a motion to order the 12-year-old girl to get a psychiatric examination. “I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing … [and] that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body,” according to an affidavit filed by Clinton in support of her motion. Clinton also cited an expert in child psychology who said that “children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents with disorganized families, such as the complainant’s, are even more prone to such behavior,” Clinton wrote in her affidavit. Ultimately, expert testimony from a scientist “cast doubt on the evidentiary value of the blood and semen the prosecutor claimed proved the defendant’s guilt in the rape,” Clinton writes in her book. Clinton negotiated a plea deal and Taylor was charged with “Unlawful Fondling of a Child Under the Age of Fourteen” and was sentenced to one year in a county jail and four years of probation, according to a final judgment signed by Cummings. In 2014, the Washington Free Beacon published the audio of an interview that Arkansas reporter Roy Reed conducted with Clinton in the 1980s. In the interview, Clinton recalls some unusual details of the rape case, and she can be heard laughing in three instances, beginning with a joke she makes about the accuracy of polygraphs. Clinton: Of course he claimed he didn’t. All this stuff. He took a lie detector test. I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs. [laughs] At another point, Clinton said the prosecutor balked at turning over evidence, forcing her to go to the judge to obtain it. Clinton: So I got an order to see the evidence and the prosecutor didn’t want me to see the evidence. I had to go to Maupin Cummings and convince Maupin that yes indeed I had a right to see the evidence [laughs] before it was presented. Clinton then said that the evidence she obtained was a pair of the accused’s underwear with a hole in it. Clinton told Reed that investigators had cut out a piece of the underwear and sent the sample to a crime lab to be tested, and the only evidence that remained was the underwear with a hole in it. Clinton took the remaining evidence to a forensic expert in Brooklyn, New York, and the expert told her that the material on the underwear wasn’t enough to test. “He said, you know, ‘You can’t prove anything,'” Clinton recalled the expert telling her. Clinton: I wrote all that stuff and I handed it to Mahlon Gibson, and I said, “Well this guy’s ready to come up from New York to prevent this miscarriage of justice.” [laughs] The emails we have received about this case contain some misinformation. Some have claimed, for example, that Clinton volunteered for the case and the accused rapist was found not guilty. That’s not accurate, as we just explained. But Clinton did laugh in the retelling of some unusual aspects of the rape case, and we leave it to others to decide whether her laughter was appropriate or not. |
|
By:
Now I really am off to bed. Good night all, and sweet dreams G2D.
|
|
By:
You said nothing, you post a lot.
Which bit is damning ? cant see it myself. You posted in the last week that this 1975 case had been proven to be bllsht, and i thought you knew something we didnt. |
|
By:
This is just a question i might be missing something?
but if you had a pair of pants with a hole cut in them wouldn't you know the hole would have been cut for a reason & already tested? sending a pair of pants away to be tested with a hole in where all the evidence might have been seems odd? |
|
By:
MD wont even know what you are talking about ron, he made his mind up the day his parents brainwashed him.
|
|
By:
Hilary 1-5 Donny 7-2 365 . Donny going down like Russian Submarine
|
|
By:
Amazed he's not double figures..
|
|
By:
Ugh.
I can't post from my phone but can read so I've had to get out of bed! Ibrahima Sonko 11 Oct 16 00:45 You said nothing, you post a lot. Which bit is damning ? cant see it myself. You posted in the last week that this 1975 case had been proven to be bllsht, and i thought you knew something we didnt. It's not damning. I was being sarcastic. A I said earlier, you are easily confused. You said earlier you have every thread saved. So, please reproduce where I posted in the last week that this 1975 case had been proven to be bullsh1t. For the record, I believe the case actually did happen, so what did I supposedly say was bullsh1t? So, to the 'you said nothing, you post a lot' element. I categorially deny having said ANYTHING that you said I did. Let's see it, since you have archives. Also, pmsl at you saying I post a lot. You have 7x as many post as I do in a years less time. I'll ignore the parents brainwashing bit save to say you're as clueless about that as you seemingly are everything else. I will have to deal with further lies, accusations and insults in the morning. I shan't be getting out of bed again! |
|
By:
Ron-Russian • October 11, 2016 12:24 AM BST
Media being told, if you support Trump your career is done here. Big News organisations warning smaller set ups to destroy Trump how corrupt / bent is this ffs I thought BRexit got a rough, but it is nothing to what is going on in the United States What exactly is so bad about Trump? It is Clinton getting into power that poses danger to this World, not Trump, it concerns me. It is the desire for conflict with Russia...that is the threat. |
|
By:
What exactly is so bad about Trump?
Are you deaf and blind ? |
|
By:
What exactly is so bad about Trump?
 |
|
By:
He is standing for leader of the most powerful country of the world
not to be the most ethical human being of the year..... the most important question is can he do the job? His shortcomings appear to be calling a woman fat once, and bragging with a few other blokes about what he may/or may not have done with women...locker room bragging. And he made full use of the tax laws....nothing ILLEGAL. He is hardly Ted Bundy. His crime of course is proposed IMMIGRATION CONTROL, which we have just voted for ourselves? Perhaps people should try looking at his policies, instead of just attacking him personally. |
|
By:
I am not allowed to give my opinion of Clinton, seems a little unfair, as people seem to be allowed to slag off Trump.
Oh well. |
|
By:
His shortcomings appear to be zero experience. Now ask yourself, if you were interviewing candidates for a top job and one of the two admitted that he had absolutely no experience, he'd be heading out the door.
Which is where Trump is being dragged, kicking and screaming all the way. |
|
By:
There are threads aplenty where Hillary is called a lying, corrupt, treacherous, warmongering, rape-enabling witch, among other things, ebul. Of course you're allowed to say what you think of her, as you well know.
I won't even report you if you do. It's just G2D I grass on. |
|
By:
Paul Joseph Watson Retweeted
WikiLeaks @wikileaks 10m10 minutes ago RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 3 (1190 new emails) #HillaryClinton #PodestaEmails #PodestaEmails3 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult … another 1190 emails released by WikiLeaks today |
|
By:
ta for that Mikael
 It is the moderators who censored me I push the bounds of misogyny at times....so I bring it on myself  Although the assessment I made did not refer to her sex...but still, it was critical |
|
By:
Have the mods censored you? Seriously?
Every time I call the delightful lady who was the first female PM of this country a ****, it disappears, so it wouldn't totally surprise me. I always attributed it to someone reporting it though. Can't believe the mods would care enough to do it of their own volition. |
|
By:
Paul Joseph Watson @PrisonPlanet 1m1 minute ago
BOMBSHELL: Hillary Clinton 'hates everyday Americans,' Wikileaks email reveals. http://www.infowars.com/wikileaks-bombshell-hillary-clinton-hates-everyday-americans/ … |
|
By:
very few of the wealthy elite (trump the narcissist being one) like the hoi polloi
|
|
By:
Our Dave couldn't even remember which football team he'd been told he supported
  |
|
By:
We need more Ron
 |
|
By:
Hillary on the drift 1.21
 |
|
By:
CNN PANELIST: BILL CLINTON’S SEXUAL ABUSES ARE “CONSPIRACY THEORY”
. http://www.infowars.com/cnn-panelist-bill-clintons-sexual-abuses-are-conspiracy-theory/ |
|
By:
Paul Joseph Watson @PrisonPlanet 53s53 seconds ago
Clinton campaign beginning to crack over Wikileaks releases. Keep up the pressure. |
|
By:
1-6 Hilary 4-1 Donny 365 - They cant give Donny away
|
|
By:
some people have an unhealthy obsession with paul watson - whoever he is -.........
|
|
By:
don attacking the republican party on twitter
bit of a meltdown |
|
By:
The Wikileaks Bombshell You Never Heard About
Published on 11 Oct 2016 While the media was distracting you with Trump saying the word "****" 11 years ago, huge revelations emerged. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMzSh4lc35I |
|
By:
Ron-Russian 11 Oct 16 16:46
Paul Joseph Watson @PrisonPlanet 53s53 seconds ago Clinton campaign beginning to crack over Wikileaks releases. Keep up the pressure 1.2 now. Keep up the good work PJW! |
|
By:
Where is Ibrahima Sonko with these quotes of mine, btw?
Please don't tell me I'm going to have to wait for Julian Assange to drip-feed them. |
|
By:
What's this Russian individual gonna do with himself if Trump doesn't win?
Seems more obsessed about getting this goon elected than lifelong Republicans? |