Please don't get this wrong as I am very deaf myself!
Without my false ears I am useless, but the question is... "Why do signers pull ridiculous faces, that are completely out of context with what they are signing"?
I'm particularly talking about the ones that appear at the bottom of the screen, who are presumably signing from the dialogue, which means they can't be deaf (unless they have autocue of course)!
Had to think about that kenny....I'm particularly talking about the ones that appear at the bottom of the screen, who are presumably signing from the dialogue, which means they can't be deaf (unless they have autocue of course)!
Signers pull faces completely IN context with what they're expressing. It's an integral part of signing. There's no grammar. The difference between a question and a statement often relies entirely on the facial expression. You might be confused by the way you don't necessarily have to sign in the same word order as the spoken statement being "translated".
When you speak normally, you not only move your lips, you also move your hands, point and pull faces. Signing is just the same, except the hand movements and expressions are more to the fore. But the lip movements are still there.
Have you seen the new Maltesers advert, where the two girls are signing an encounter with a big, stupid dog? "Big" involves not just moving the hands apart, but also puffing the cheeks. And when signing "I was round Theo's", she signs the letter "T" (index finger touching palm), then "house" (fingertips touching at an angle), but at the same time mouths the words "Theo's house", so she doesn't have to laboriously finger-spell T-H-E-O.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYIEAIogarI
They all work together. So if you want to make a deaf person's life easier, even if you know no sign language, try making your lips visible, miming absolutely anything that can be mimed, and pull faces and point.
Signers pull faces completely IN context with what they're expressing. It's an integral part of signing. There's no grammar. The difference between a question and a statement often relies entirely on the facial expression. You might be confused by th
Important not to think of signing as some inferior attempt at copying the spoken English language. It's a language in its own right, which would exist even if there were no such thing as speaking or hearing. You could argue that the girl in that Maltesers advert expresses how stupid that dog is better by hitting her palm with her fist and semi-rolling her eyes than a hearing person could by using the word "stupid". Mind you, the hearing person would probably still involuntarily roll their eyes at that point.
Thanks, Diva. Important not to think of signing as some inferior attempt at copying the spoken English language. It's a language in its own right, which would exist even if there were no such thing as speaking or hearing. You could argue that the gir