Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 51 comments are related to the topic:
QUESTION ABOUT THE BIG BANG.
QUESTION ABOUT THE BIG BANG.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 51
|
By:
"The energy stored in the Earth's magnetic field has steadily decreased by a factor of 2.7 over the past 1000 years. Evolutionary theories explaining this rapid decrease, as well as how the Earth could have maintained its magnetic field for billions of years, are very complex and inadequate."
"All naturally occurring families of radioactive elements generate helium as they decay. If such decay took place for billions of years, as alleged by evolutionists, much helium should have found its way into the Earth's atmosphere. Yet the atmosphere today has only 0.05% of the amount of helium it would have accumulated during 5 billion years. This means the atmosphere is much younger than the alleged evolutionary age." |
|
By:
The 2nd law states that all things left to themselves tend to run down from order to disorder and decay. This is true of the universe as well. If evolution were true, it would demand just the opposite - the building up from simpler to the more complex. Adding great periods of time does not change this fact.
|
|
By:
the big bang theory has broken down due to the continued expansion of the universe .Because the dark matter and the dark energy will not work out in the maths they have come out with a new idea that can be fitted into the maths and their sums add up.
They have decided to call it Dark FLOW but the don't know what it is,dont know what causes it,they cant see it,and they don't know where it is,in fact they just decided to name it Dark Flow and when they put the DF symbol into the equation the maths work out on paper that there was a big expansion or big bang .Check it out its called Dark Flow.  |
|
By:
Yet the atmosphere today has only 0.05% of the amount of helium it would have accumulated during 5 billion years. This means the atmosphere is much younger than the alleged evolutionary age."
No it doesn't. As I explained before, most of the helium escapes into space mostly to be captured by the sun's gravitational pull. There is so much disinformation on the net, twisted logic propagated by creationist groups desperate to to promote their unsound belief system. And you lap it up like Kenny's cats around a saucer of milk. Carry on googling |
|
By:
they still wont listen to brass and call it by its real name=Ante gravity.
|
|
By:
weird science
last night i watched a BBC documentary with a bald guy from Morocco or London that was explaining the start of the universe. He has a lovely speaking voice. So tender... anyway he explained this weird young woman told all the uppity professors that owned science, that the sun was mostly hydrogen and helium. The big professor in charge of the cash box said - you are a woman you know nothing - he then told her the sun was made of Gold and Carbon and strawberry jelly. Three years later he did his own experiments and he did it in a different way(using his dad's boxer shorts and telescope?) He said sorry to the uppity woman and pronounced her findings as super special. they handed her the keys to the labs and they left for a tropical island to sit on the beach and look at their bits and bobs. the end. science revised again? a story for kiddies. |
|
By:
that morrocan/london guy: Prof Jim Al-Khalili - the beginning and end of the universe BBC4.
he mentioned the universe expanding at the start.... one billionth, billionth, billionth of a second - from nothing to something? (minute 57. bbc iplayer) so in the BBB of a second - what was the speed of light? perhaps faster? speed equals distance / time ? |
|
By:
bedeebebdee bedee bedee - that's all folks...
the big bang theory - one o the buoys? tellin em all how it is? Begorrah? tell Katherine to come into the parlour young Jamie... let's laugh off our socks that they bought such a bag o worms. Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître (17 July 1894 – 20 June 1966) was a Belgian priest, astronomer and professor of physics at the Catholic University of Leuven.[1] He proposed the theory of the expansion of the universe, widely misattributed to Edwin Hubble.[2][3] He was the first to derive what is now known as Hubble's law and made the first estimation of what is now called the Hubble constant, which he published in 1927, two years before Hubble's article.[4][5][6][7] Lemaître also proposed what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the universe, which he called his "hypothesis of the primeval atom" or the "Cosmic Egg". wiki quote. |
|
By:
You make a mistake in attacking science Zorro, it is the best thing about us human beings...
We have made the world better for ourselves, do you know how grim life was in the past? The World does not seem necessarily happier because us human beings are a pretty nasty lot, and science can't change that. You can still believe in GOD if you want to Zorro, there is an awful lot we don't know. You should go and live in the Amish Christian community in America that would suit you. They reject most of the modern conveniences science has given us. |
|
By:
Of course we can do terrible things to each other because of science, blow each into bits, burn each other, dismember each other,
and lots of other nasties with modern weapons. But that is not the fault of science,that is the problem of our own nature,we are violent, greedy,obsessed with sex and other things. Science is good, we also need to leave this planet, we have a universe to colonise, that is our destiny as a species. |
|
By:
My dear o'Flaherty - it's been all those christian scholars that have been aiming the breakthroughs in history... sure some atheists helped. I'm willing to give you a share o the cake.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christians_in_science_and_technology Hildegard of Bingen (1098 – 1179), also known as Saint Hildegard and Sibyl of the Rhine, was a German Benedictine abbess.She is considered to be the founder of scientific natural history in Germany a thousand years ago? did she really exist - maybe it's like Jesus, a bogus thing. Nicole Oresme (c.1323–1382): Theologian and bishop of Lisieux, he was one of the early founders and popularizers of modern sciences. One of his many scientific contributions is the discovery of the curvature of light through atmospheric refraction. 700 years might still be fake. Joseph Priestley (1733–1804): Nontrinitarianism clergyman who wrote the controversial work History of the Corruptions of Christianity. He is credited with discovering oxygen. 200 years ago - maybe he was real? wait that MP was killed in the town that Priestley was born in. I remember the town square with his statue in the back ground. |
|
By:
Science is neutral - it's not good or bad -
good and bad live in a moral world of judgments. Is it a good thing if someone murders the yorkshire ripper? is it bad? are you good one day, bad the next? scales of judgement? Did Sir Jimmy get away with it? in the atheist world he's got away with it. In God's world he might be in trouble. |