Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
BRITAIN is home to more than 3 million Muslims for the first time ever with more than half born outside the UK, according to new figures.
Soaring immigration and sky high birth rates have seen the number in the country double in a little over a decade.
Some parts of London are now almost 50 per cent Islamic, according to analysis from the Office for National Statistics.
If current trends continue the areas could become majority Muslim within ten years.
One in four Muslims in England and Wales are under ten years old than in any other age group indicating a very high birth rate within the community.
Soaring immigration and sky high birth rates have seen the number in the country double in a little over a decade.
Some parts of London are now almost 50 per cent Islamic, according to analysis from the Office for National Statistics.
If current trends continue the areas could become majority Muslim within ten years.
One in four Muslims in England and Wales are under ten years old than in any other age group indicating a very high birth rate within the community.
Show More
I don't know if that was sarcasm wit-ham
But feminism in our own society is harming us
Not a lot in Muslim societies
But feminism in our own society is harming us
Not a lot in Muslim societies
It's not having kids and putting it off until
late in life,then only having one means losing the numbers game
is the way i see it.
late in life,then only having one means losing the numbers game
is the way i see it.
At least we all have the benefit of knowing it's a religion of peace! 
Europe has seen a number of young men named M*hamm*d committing atrocities this Summer, shouting a well-known Arabic phrase as they do so.
Hey, guess what ! It's also the most popular name for new male babies, not just in London but also in England and Wales. What could possibly go wrong?
Nothing to worry about of course because these will all grow up to be fine Straight 'A' Men of Peace, many of them certain to be watched by Premiership Clubs.
.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/revealed-the-most-popular-name-for-baby-boys-in-london-according-to-official-data-a2871406.html
.
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2015/08/mohammed-really-is-the-single-most-popular-boys-name-in-england-and-wales/
Hey, guess what ! It's also the most popular name for new male babies, not just in London but also in England and Wales. What could possibly go wrong?
Nothing to worry about of course because these will all grow up to be fine Straight 'A' Men of Peace, many of them certain to be watched by Premiership Clubs.
.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/revealed-the-most-popular-name-for-baby-boys-in-london-according-to-official-data-a2871406.html
.
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2015/08/mohammed-really-is-the-single-most-popular-boys-name-in-england-and-wales/
It is when the first white couple name their son after M, we have to start worrying.
It is an open contest at the moment
It is an open contest at the moment
We will have to leave, perhaps to a different planet to get away from them.
they might follow us
they might follow us
A lot of us will be dead within the next 10-15 years, some sooner. Enjoy while you can # Cheers
lfc1971 • August 28, 2016 11:49 PM BST
We will have to leave, perhaps to a different planet to get away from them.
they might follow usSad
You think it is that bad lfc1971
We will have to leave, perhaps to a different planet to get away from them.
they might follow usSad
You think it is that bad lfc1971
that`s how it has always been throughout history ebul, people have had to move to get away from other people.
the world was large then and so it was possible, but not now.
the world was large then and so it was possible, but not now.
lfc1971 • August 29, 2016 12:04 AM BST
that`s how it has always been throughout history ebul, people have had to move to get away from other people.
the world was large then and so it was possible, but not now.
The thing is lfc1971...where exactly are we going to go?
Perhaps some good news
Scientists find Earth-like planet circling sun’s nearest neighbor
http://venturebeat.com/2016/08/27/scientists-find-earth-like-planet-circling-suns-nearest-neighbor/
It is not known for certain whether it contains liquid water or an atmosphere yet
it is also 25 trillion miles from earth
Not to going to be easy to get to....still it could be an option
that`s how it has always been throughout history ebul, people have had to move to get away from other people.
the world was large then and so it was possible, but not now.
The thing is lfc1971...where exactly are we going to go?
Perhaps some good news
Scientists find Earth-like planet circling sun’s nearest neighbor
http://venturebeat.com/2016/08/27/scientists-find-earth-like-planet-circling-suns-nearest-neighbor/
It is not known for certain whether it contains liquid water or an atmosphere yet
it is also 25 trillion miles from earth
Not to going to be easy to get to....still it could be an option
Scotland is the answer, you English should be heading up here, the sooner the better. cheers.
Mars is nearer lfc1971...but has no atmosphere, no air, it is too cold for life or liquid water on the surface.
We could live there in protective domes producing everything needed for life.
But we are not hurrying ourselves, we have lost a lot of our desire for space exploration which people had when I was young.
We will probably go to Mars one day I should think
ps
It is cold up in Scotland bairn, would we any better off going there rather than Mars?
We could live there in protective domes producing everything needed for life.
But we are not hurrying ourselves, we have lost a lot of our desire for space exploration which people had when I was young.
We will probably go to Mars one day I should think
ps
It is cold up in Scotland bairn, would we any better off going there rather than Mars?
it's been 10 degrees colder than Londonistan all summer but very pleasant, sell your house down there and buy a castle up here, but hurry before "they" move in. cheers.
You would also have to guarantee there no Muslims in Scotland bairn.
lfc1971 says we must go somewhere there are no Muslims.
I doubt there are Muslims on Mars, although we don't know that for certain about Proxima B that
Earth like planet in our nearest Star system?
Right Bairn, any cheap Castles going with moat and drawbridge of course
lfc1971 says we must go somewhere there are no Muslims.
I doubt there are Muslims on Mars, although we don't know that for certain about Proxima B that
Earth like planet in our nearest Star system?
Right Bairn, any cheap Castles going with moat and drawbridge of course
There are plans to send nano spacecraft to proxima b, could reach it in 20 years
they can send pictures back.
The aim to check if it is
1) Habitable
2) There no Muslims lfc1971
Sounds very exiting
I don't know if I will be alive when it happens?
It gives hope for the Human Race I feel....we are so petty nowadsys, we need a purpose
they can send pictures back.
The aim to check if it is
1) Habitable
2) There no Muslims lfc1971
Sounds very exiting
I don't know if I will be alive when it happens?It gives hope for the Human Race I feel....we are so petty nowadsys, we need a purpose
their is a castle going for £4million right now, belongs to the younger family, remember George Younger, I think he was in the Thatcher government, he died, then his wife Lady Younger died so the castle is on the market, there are no Moslems in that part of the country, only the cities is where they congregate at the moment, Nicola Sturgeon wants free borders and welcome refugees in our little country, they have just announced a £15billion tax deficit, so how she is going to pay for all those free loading Moslems in the future only she knows. so get your fat English ars es up here as quick as you can and vote her out. cheers.
South America seems to be the last muslim-free continent.
Hardin don't like this kind of thing
Hardin focused on human population growth, the use of the Earth's natural resources, and the welfare state.[7] Hardin argued that if individuals relied on themselves alone, and not on the relationship of society and man, then the number of children had by each family would not be of public concern. Parents breeding excessively would leave fewer descendants because they would be unable to provide for each child adequately. Such negative feedback is found in the animal kingdom.[7] Hardin said that if the children of improvident parents starved to death, if overbreeding was its own punishment, then there would be no public interest in controlling the breeding of families.[7] Hardin blamed the welfare state for allowing the tragedy of the commons; where the state provides for children and supports overbreeding as a fundamental human right, Malthusian catastrophe is inevitable. Consequently, in his article, Hardin lamented the following proposal from the United Nations:
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights describes the family as the natural and fundamental unit of society. [Article 16[8]] It follows that any choice and decision with regard to the size of the family must irrevocably rest with the family itself, and cannot be made by anyone else.
— U Thant, Statement on Population by UN Secretary-General[9]
In addition, Hardin also pointed out the problem of individuals acting in rational self-interest by claiming that if all members in a group used common resources for their own gain and with no regard for others, all resources would still eventually be depleted. Overall, Hardin argued against relying on conscience as a means of policing commons, suggesting that this favors selfish individuals – often known as free riders – over those who are more altruistic.
In the context of avoiding over-exploitation of common resources, Hardin concluded by restating Hegel's maxim (which was quoted by Engels), "freedom is the recognition of necessity". He suggested that "freedom" completes the tragedy of the commons. By recognizing resources as commons in the first place, and by recognizing that, as such, they require management, Hardin believed that humans "can preserve and nurture other and more precious freedoms".
Hardin focused on human population growth, the use of the Earth's natural resources, and the welfare state.[7] Hardin argued that if individuals relied on themselves alone, and not on the relationship of society and man, then the number of children had by each family would not be of public concern. Parents breeding excessively would leave fewer descendants because they would be unable to provide for each child adequately. Such negative feedback is found in the animal kingdom.[7] Hardin said that if the children of improvident parents starved to death, if overbreeding was its own punishment, then there would be no public interest in controlling the breeding of families.[7] Hardin blamed the welfare state for allowing the tragedy of the commons; where the state provides for children and supports overbreeding as a fundamental human right, Malthusian catastrophe is inevitable. Consequently, in his article, Hardin lamented the following proposal from the United Nations:
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights describes the family as the natural and fundamental unit of society. [Article 16[8]] It follows that any choice and decision with regard to the size of the family must irrevocably rest with the family itself, and cannot be made by anyone else.
— U Thant, Statement on Population by UN Secretary-General[9]
In addition, Hardin also pointed out the problem of individuals acting in rational self-interest by claiming that if all members in a group used common resources for their own gain and with no regard for others, all resources would still eventually be depleted. Overall, Hardin argued against relying on conscience as a means of policing commons, suggesting that this favors selfish individuals – often known as free riders – over those who are more altruistic.
In the context of avoiding over-exploitation of common resources, Hardin concluded by restating Hegel's maxim (which was quoted by Engels), "freedom is the recognition of necessity". He suggested that "freedom" completes the tragedy of the commons. By recognizing resources as commons in the first place, and by recognizing that, as such, they require management, Hardin believed that humans "can preserve and nurture other and more precious freedoms".
ebulGery-Used to joke about this when they started up the space-station
as to where the well-off and rulers would disappear to when got to bad down here.
as to where the well-off and rulers would disappear to when got to bad down here.
they do tell you everyone is considered a muslim until they declare they are not?
you have to opt out.
tw ats
you have to opt out.
tw ats
50 per cent, when the national news shows a report from any London schools, it is more like 98 per cent and possibly worse in other areas of England, I am not a racist, just a casual observer, but the balance seems to be changing at a rapid rate of knots. cheers.
it's an odds on fait accompli aided and abetted by supine,spineless,successive governments extolling the virtues of PC,assimilation,diversity,multiculturism et al
not long now until the 2nd Big Bang(if there were ever a first) and bye bye mankind
not long now until the 2nd Big Bang(if there were ever a first) and bye bye mankind
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539