A complicated question but it shouldn't be, The three most famous English people of all time as we stand now would have been different 10, 25, 50, 100 years ago, just because someone may be in the list now who may well be still alive or very recently deceased they would not qualify because the question says OF ALL TIME, so people being asked in 1716 1816 & 1916 may well have said Isaac Newton which surely beats the pants off any c r a p answers your gonna get with recent sporting & showbiz people.
A complicated question but it shouldn't be, The three most famous English people of all time as we stand now would have been different 10, 25, 50, 100 years ago, just because someone may be in the list now who may well be still alive or very recently
I give some English conversation classes and we used this topic recently. The results were Churchill, Shakespeare and Beckham. Groups are from teenagers to 50ish and Russian.
I give some English conversation classes and we used this topic recently. The results were Churchill, Shakespeare and Beckham. Groups are from teenagers to 50ish and Russian.
Wellington held much the same position as Churchill a century earlier.Cromwell was the only non-royal ruler of England before parliamentary democracy. Both were great generals which Churchill wasn't. As somebody wisely said earlier the answer will be different depending on when you ask it. In 2016 I accept Churchill would be far ahead of the other two but I'm not sure that would be true in 2500. I didn't say ALL Newton's theories have been shown to be wrong. I'm not a scientist but I don't think it works like that. Einstein showed things were a lot more complicated than Newton thought and his theories,although themselves questioned in certain areas,now are the foundation stone of modern physics. Darwin holds the same position in biology as Einstein in physics but of course that will probably no longer be true in 2500. So I'll go with Shakespeare Darwin Churchill ( replacing Elizabeth I ) I'd be confident Shakespeare will still be anmongst the top 3 in 400 years,but I doubt the other two would. Anybody want to bet ? Sportspeople do not last. W G Grace was more famous in his day than Beckham or any other English sportsperson you care to mention but nobody now even thinks of him as one of the top 5 or 10 greatest English sportsmen.
Wellington held much the same position as Churchill a century earlier.Cromwell was the only non-royal ruler of England before parliamentary democracy. Both were great generals which Churchill wasn't. As somebody wisely said earlier the answer will be
You can't have Tarzan. He was created by an American ffs. Chaplin is nothing like as well known now as when I was young,which wasn't at the time Chaplin's silent films.
You can't have Tarzan. He was created by an American ffs.Chaplin is nothing like as well known now as when I was young,which wasn't at the time Chaplin's silent films.
King Arthur, famous all over the planet for his round tables, his swords in stones and ladies in lakes. he's also the one of the oldest in British history.
King Arthur, famous all over the planet for his round tables, his swords in stones and ladies in lakes. he's also the one of the oldest in British history.
He was Celtic so we Welsh can claim him imo. Fictional or not,and the chances are he was vaguely based on a real person,he spent his life fighting the English as in Anglo-Saxons.
He was Celtic so we Welsh can claim him imo. Fictional or not,and the chances are he was vaguely based on a real person,he spent his life fighting the English as in Anglo-Saxons.
If you're looking for famous Anglo-saxons prior to the Norman conquest there is obviously Alfred but arguably even greater the now almost completely forgotten Aethelstan,the first king to rule over the whole of an England with roughly the present boundaries.
If you're looking for famous Anglo-saxons prior to the Norman conquest there is obviously Alfred but arguably even greater the now almost completely forgotten Aethelstan,the first king to rule over the whole of an England with roughly the present bou
Fawkes was a Yorkshireman. I presume guiness you are suggesting that Arthur was really that Roman general based in Britain who marched on Rome and briefly became Emperor. That became part of the Arthur legend by Malory's time but is almost certainly conflating two different people.Arthur was a bit later. I seem to remember being semi-convinced that Arhur was,or was based on,a Celtic warlord called something like Rhadamantus.
Fawkes was a Yorkshireman.I presume guiness you are suggesting that Arthur was really that Roman general based in Britain who marched on Rome and briefly became Emperor. That became part of the Arthur legend by Malory's time but is almost certainly c
Rome had occupied Britain for 400 years. The upper-class natives had certainly become Romanised so you are right about the name. Doesn't make him Italian though.
Rome had occupied Britain for 400 years. The upper-class natives had certainly become Romanised so you are right about the name. Doesn't make him Italian though.
That's what I said. Definitely NOT English.That also applies to St Patrick who was Welsh originally. Riothamus was the name I was looking for incidentally.
That's what I said. Definitely NOT English.That also applies to St Patrick who was Welsh originally. Riothamus was the name I was looking for incidentally.
Salmon Spray , I was born less than 200yds from were The Duke of Wellington was born , its a little place called DUBLIN ....Have some friends coming from America this weekend and thats one of the surprises on the menu..He was born across the road from what is now our Governments Building were our Dail, or Parliment as ye would call it sits.
Salmon Spray , I was born less than 200yds from were The Duke of Wellington was born , its a little place called DUBLIN ....Have some friends coming from America this weekend and thats one of the surprises on the menu..He was born across the road fro
Yes I knew he was born in Ireland workrider but as a member of the aristocracy I would imagine he self-identified as English. I stand to be corrected if someone can find anything suggesting otherwise as I don't know a great deal about the bloke tbh.
Yes I knew he was born in Ireland workrider but as a member of the aristocracy I would imagine he self-identified as English. I stand to be corrected if someone can find anything suggesting otherwise as I don't know a great deal about the bloke tbh.
So we can safely say anyone who thinks themselves other than their Country of birth is correct , how we identify ourselves is our business , were we are BORN is a fact....
So we can safely say anyone who thinks themselves other than their Country of birth is correct , how we identify ourselves is our business , were we are BORN is a fact....
bet you will not beat these three. 1=William SHAKESPEARE 2=Isaac Newton 3=Henry v111
the majority of people living in london wouldn't have a scooby who these people were
bet you will not beat these three.1=William SHAKESPEARE2=Isaac Newton3=Henry v111the majority of people living in london wouldn't have a scooby who these people were