Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Deltâ
24 Jul 16 22:10
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Mar 02
| Topic/replies: 62,895 | Blogger: Deltâ's blog
They arrived to discover a man in his 50s was unconscious and unbreathing, and he was pronounced dead at the scene.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 42
By:
crags
When: 24 Jul 16 22:12
Yes.
By:
Foinavon
When: 24 Jul 16 22:15
Yes, assuming that incorrrect means incorrect.
By:
betting_masta
When: 24 Jul 16 22:21
'unbreathing' CrazyLaugh
By:
crags
When: 24 Jul 16 22:27
It's correct. Unbreathing is a word.
By:
GoOnThen
When: 24 Jul 16 22:39
Not breathing. Not correct.
By:
crags
When: 24 Jul 16 22:41
Definition of unbreathing

:  not breathing; especially :  holding one's breath
By:
Ibrahima Sonko
When: 24 Jul 16 22:42
He could had been asleep and holding his breath.
By:
Velasquez
When: 24 Jul 16 22:47
Whether it's correct or not, it's clumsy and obtuse writing, like it's been written by a robot.
By:
Deltâ
When: 24 Jul 16 22:47
crags,


everydays a school day then here ...
By:
Make my hay
When: 24 Jul 16 22:48
*everyday's a school day when here ...
By:
crags
When: 24 Jul 16 22:50
This ungreat thread could turn into a great one.
By:
Make my hay
When: 24 Jul 16 22:55
They may have thought he was pretending to be dead, they weren't to know, not until  they checked  he was dead.
By:
crags
When: 24 Jul 16 22:56
He could have been one of the undead, yes.
By:
Just Checking
When: 24 Jul 16 22:58
Correct, yes, I don't see a problem. Sentence scans ok. Breathless is a different thing altogther.
There is no word I can think of better than unbreathing.

My quible might be the ", and". Thats what I'd focus on.
I'd suggest it should be , or and, not both.
By:
Make my hay
When: 24 Jul 16 23:04
but how did they discover the man was in his 50s?
By:
crags
When: 24 Jul 16 23:04
ID on him with DOB?
By:
Make my hay
When: 24 Jul 16 23:09
they should have tried to resuscitate him first before going through his wallet.
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 26 Jul 16 03:44
Possibly he was one of the UNDEAD ?
By:
David Fishwick Minibus Sales
When: 26 Jul 16 03:55
ununfückingbelievable
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 26 Jul 16 10:17
Shows what happens when an organization spends millions recruiting undermanagers instead of thousands recruiting sub-editors.

They arrived to discover a man in his 50s unconscious and not breathing, who was pronounced dead at the scene.
By:
Pokermonster
When: 26 Jul 16 10:27
I think they should have included more detail.

They arrived to discover a man in his 50s unconscious and not breathing, who was pronounced dead at the scene by an alert woman in her 40s breathing heavily.
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 10:33
they arrived and discovered..
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 10:37
it is better not to use `to discover`
`only to discover` is acceptable in some cases
but in this case `and discovered` is better
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 10:41
was it their purpose to discover a man? no.
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 10:43
there purpose was merely to arrive, after that they would discover whatever happened to be there to discover
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 10:43
bad spelling
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 10:57
is there any time it is ok to use the phrase `to discover`?
no
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 11:02
you might say, to try and discover
or with the intention of discovering
or in the hope of discovering
or by mere chance i discovered
or with perserverence and some good luck we discovered
and others

but not `to discover`
By:
dunlaying
When: 26 Jul 16 11:37
BBC British?
By:
dunlaying
When: 26 Jul 16 11:39
Re "to discover" ; you can certainly say " arrived , only to discover...".
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 14:02
^ quite right, that is what i said.
`only to discover` is acceptable in some cases, including in this case
`and discovered` may be better, but is also acceptable
`to discover` is not
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 14:05
the reason `only to discover` may not be ideal is beause it hints that thay may have been surprised at the discovery...but of course if they had been called out it should not have been a surprise, assuming they were properly trained emergency professionals.
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 14:08
perhaps `only to find` would be better
i starting to doubt that discover is the right word, perhaps not
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 14:15
`and found` is better again,

1)and found a man in his 50s
2)only to find a man in his 50s
3)and discovered a man in his 50s
4)only to discover a man in his 50s
these are acceptable, in order of preference?

to discover is not, for reasons given.
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 14:23
no there would seem to be only 2 acceptable..

1) and found a man
2) and discovered a man
By:
jollyswagman
When: 26 Jul 16 14:25
i clicked on a thread on chit chat to discover lfc was up to his usual trick Wink

who would find this sentence unacceptable? perhaps someone who was mad Scared
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 14:47
no swagman i have taken a look around and am pleased to report that only about 87% of the worlds population are mad.
some countries are almost totally insane.

they shall remain nameless

what`s wrong with me? nothing at all, nothing at all.
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 14:47
i dare to say that i am completely fine
By:
lfc1971
When: 26 Jul 16 14:48
it is just today is a rare exception.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com