|
By:
Yes Haig thought that after an incredible 7 day barrage there would not be a German left alive, he got that badly wrong.
Haig's second in command Rawlinson urged a more cautious approach, but Haig over ruled him. The French to the South of the British made good ground as did the British in the South. The Germans were more experienced and professional all round than our boys. Our boys died bravely, though no shortage of courage. This battle was where we found out what the First World War was really about. |
|
By:
Our men were told to march steadily towards the enemy keeping in line
![]() as all the Germans would be dead Our troops needed to running as fast as they could, the Germans were very much alive. |
|
By:
how from chelt to ealing leopard?
|
|
By:
80 miles at a guess
Part II now bbc2 |
|
By:
The series continued with the assault on the 2nd line of German trenches.
Woods, ridges, farm houses become major battles as the terrible slaughter continues. There is a terrible sacrifice by British Empire troops Canadians, Australians even an Indian Cavalry Regiment. The Germans themselves start to suffer from the terrible cost of Human Life, which was the point of this battle. To take the pressure off the French at Verdun German Commander Falkenhayn is replaced by Hindenberg and Ludendorf who device a more flexible defence strategy for the Germans using deeper defence positions. This was a war dominated by defence. It was so terribly costly in human beings to attack entrenched positions. |
|
By:
It tells us how long it takes flies to devour an unburied human corpse. Not that I would have wanted to know
![]() |
|
By:
Part III now
|
|
By:
The assault on the 3rd German line of defence.
We see a couple of new ideas by ourselves, the debut of the tank, and the creeping barrage. The tank initially terrified the Germans, but at this stage were unreliable and too heavy. They rarely lasted more than a day and could become bogged down in mud. The creeping barrage just in front of our troops frequently got out of synchronization with the troops. So could fall short or fall too far in advance. The Germans for their part continue to develop their flexible strength in depth, and introduced Storm Troopers. These were especially trained elite troops who would immediately counter attack any British gains. The battlefield is now nothing but mud making it very hard for the troops, and the battle drifts to a close at the end of 1916. The maximum gain was 6 miles, no breakthrough of the German lines. This cost well over 400,000 British and Commonwealth losses, over 200,000 French losses, up to 400,000 German losses. Well over a million men killed, missing or wounded for a mere 6 miles. The term heroes led by donkeys could be applied. For Hague and the British a painful learning experience. The German seem more professional here...intelligence and interrogation of prisoners much better than the British(no torture used). |
|
By:
Jerry we don't need your sarcastic propaganda ,why dont you give it a rest
Many of us lost family in this conflict and your one eyed snide remarks are wearing thin you muppet . It was a fckn war ,we did not make the war and the alternative was what ? You have spouted enough lies and prejudice ,time to stf up and show some respect . |
|
By:
I am not giving you sarcastic propaganda breadnbutter, any more than that program was. It is showing what happened.
People may want to know, why so many of their loved ones had to die. It was a fckn war ,we did not make the war and the alternative was what ? Yes what??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? We did not have to fight. Feel free to block my posts I think you are a muppet yourself breadnbutter |
|
By:
You think your providing some sort of info for people who lost family ?
http://www.historynet.com/the-tragic-pursuit-of-total-victory-germanys-unrelenting-offensive-that-lost-wwi.htm why is that gerry ? all you have done is besmirch the brave soldiers and mock the British tactics ,you have offered nothing else ,the Germans started the war and all you offer is not getting involved . It was just a tiff between cousins ,millions slaughtered on a whim and all easily avoided ,thats your take ,but its as far from the truth or the reality as you could get . your a joker ,a sick one at that ,we all know where your coming from ,typical from your lot and no i want block you ,you block me |
|
By:
I apologise if you think I besmirch brave soldiers, I did not intend that breadnbutter
They had to live, fight and die in appalling conditions, doing their duty, I feel desperately sorry for them. It was just a tiff between cousins ,millions slaughtered on a whim and all easily avoided yes that is my take, I admit it. It cannot be all blamed on the Germans. We were all taken far too easily into this war. |
|
By:
my great grandad survived this although he did lose a little finger and eventually got gassed, apparently the gassing changed the pitch in his voice. I had all his medals mounted in a glass case a couple of years ago along with his photograph.
|
|
By:
So Burton are you trying to say a spiv supporter like yourself comes from a family of war heroes
|
|
By:
no I am saying he was one of the fortunate few
|
|
By:
I would have a sporting wager that there would be far more war medals among UKIP members and supporters than any other group.
|
|
By:
We all have our own ideas on here, I apologise if I appear sarcastic at times
I probably am ![]() In my opinion, WWI started in Serbia. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand by Serbian freedom fighters/terrorists. Serbia wanted freedom from the Austrian/Hungarian empire. Russia pledged support for Serbia, this meant war with the Austrian/Hungarian Empire. Germany pledged support for the Austrian/Hungarian Empire this meant war with Russia. France was bound by treaty to Russia, if Russia fought, so did they, which meant war with Germany. Britain made a decision to fight with France. WE feared a Europe dominated by Germany would threaten us and our Empire. If any country had any conception of the blood bath WWI would turn out to be, would countries have made the same decision. I doubt it, but we are not born with hindsight. Everybody thought it would be over by Christmas 1914. |
|
By:
Serbia was merely an ignition,the Kaiser had decided to prepare for war much earlier,their plans for invading France and turning on Russia were in place by 1912,if it hadn't been then it would have been later.Germany had aggresively boosted its navy and conscription with an army of 5 million trained servicemen while Britain had a 'contemptible little army' at the start of WW1.
Incidentally, Germany lost and Britain,despite all its failings won so we have to assume the Generals,much derided by Lloyd George a philandering politician who spread lies about Haig (a familiar style),must have had some merits. |
|
By:
We also had aggressively increased our navy. Russia had plans for military expansion.
This is something we can argue about, historians do, I would not just put it on Germany myself I think everybody was up for this. But had no idea the sort of war it would be. I am not sure Britian won, but we were on the winning side. I do not think any of the military commanders knew how to fight this war. Technology had moved on.Lloyde George hated Haig because of the enormous casualties. Haig had one saving grace he learnt from his mistakes. There was no one else for the job. |
|
By:
watching twerps like swag and gerald debate the origin of ww1 is a dispiriting spectacle. they are full of received opinion. they know and understand nothing. serious historians still argue about it now.
it was not a row between dynasties, despite what that great student of history, gery says. and a greater rate of death occurred among generals(more than 200 died) than privates, so your class-hatred is based on a lie. ignorance and prejudice are dangerous, and you two wanchors are full of both. |
|
By:
great student of history
![]() I like that grappler IT interests me, I love discussing it and no I am not always right, but I argue my side |