Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
28 Jun 16
22:43
Joined:
Date Joined:
10 Jan 12
more control on the freedom of movement
allow the 16-17 to vote
Let the poles vote
allow the 16-17 to vote
Let the poles vote
Show More
He should have stood above it and promised to abide with whatever decision the British people decded to do. Once he led the campaign and allowed the govt machine to take a side he encouraged any anti tory grievance to be attached to the Remain campaign.The politics of resentment may not have been that large but I certainly believe it was more than 5% which could have swung it.
Always worth remembering he cheated from day 1 with the overspend on the
leaflets - you wouldn't trust the weasel as far as you could kick him.
leaflets - you wouldn't trust the weasel as far as you could kick him.
Should have stayed out of things instead of talking down to people and telling us what was best for us. He came over as completely untrustworthy and must have done the Tories a lot of harm.Lost credibility by pretending he had got a good deal out of the EU when in reality he came away with nothing.
More multi millionaire celebrities and business owners telling us to remain would have done it.
Maybe if he had admitted he had sh*gged Rebecca Brookes
That would have swung it !
That would have swung it !
The scare tactics were counter productive in my view.
Far better to have emphasised how we could prosper if out of EU but that we'd be even better in. If that's what you believe.I don't.
Far better to have emphasised how we could prosper if out of EU but that we'd be even better in. If that's what you believe.I don't.
He might well have won if he had kept Obama, Brendan, Geldof etc out of it. Cameron is a nincompoop , politically speaking that is.
Cameron should have voted leave. That would have swung it in remains favour.
If he really thought it was better for us to stay in the EU.....then why offer a referendum
He has been elected to govern this country...he is allowed to make decisions
I agree with treetop, Cameron should have remained on the side lines and not got involved in the slanging match of lies and deceit.
Harold Wilson had already showed him how it should be done when he held a referendum on the EU.
That 9 millions he spent of taxpayers money on a remain sheet started the rot.
After that, fewer and fewer people were prepared to believe the government because of that fist hit below the belt.
Harold Wilson had already showed him how it should be done when he held a referendum on the EU.
That 9 millions he spent of taxpayers money on a remain sheet started the rot.
After that, fewer and fewer people were prepared to believe the government because of that fist hit below the belt.
if he would of remained impartial and put across both sides of the argument properly then im certain we would of remained in the eu
At least we have got control and our destiny is no longer in the hands of a few bureaucrats in Brussels.
General consensus here is....
David Cameron the 21st century's answer to Neville Chamberlain.
David Cameron the 21st century's answer to Neville Chamberlain.
Lost credibility also when telling Obama to tell us we'd be at the back of the queue for trade deals if we left.
If it was all about immigration maybe cameron should've guaranteed the continuation of free movement to the uk post brexit...
That would refocus the argument on the economy and neutralise the leave campaign's main stance.
That would refocus the argument on the economy and neutralise the leave campaign's main stance.
shouldnt have gone in dumbing down the issues of negotiating tariffs and its knock on effects.
problem he had the public in general dont want to go down that route because its boring.
much easier to promote issues like immigration , nhs struggling (tories fault so they could hardly use that but corbyn could have)....laws another thing cameron couldnt go into because some of their laws were ridiculous especially austerity which the un has even slammed as unfair on the poor.
he didnt think it through when it was put in their manifesto.
if the government can make such a monumental **** up then how can you expect them to lead us forward from here?
problem he had the public in general dont want to go down that route because its boring.
much easier to promote issues like immigration , nhs struggling (tories fault so they could hardly use that but corbyn could have)....laws another thing cameron couldnt go into because some of their laws were ridiculous especially austerity which the un has even slammed as unfair on the poor.
he didnt think it through when it was put in their manifesto.
if the government can make such a monumental **** up then how can you expect them to lead us forward from here?
he's been saying for years at PMQs how bad EU is
no one,not even his mother believed him,when he said remain
no one,not even his mother believed him,when he said remain
How can you sell handing the control of your country to another power?
Well if he did not want us to leave...he should not have offered a referendum should he
Still he did...and people have spoken.
Still he did...and people have spoken.
G1-Jockey_4
especially austerity which the un has even slammed as unfair on the poor.
I agee Jockey4, I hate Cameron and all modern Tories for that.
Neither does it help a business recovery???...the poor don't have a lot of money to spend
especially austerity which the un has even slammed as unfair on the poor.
I agee Jockey4, I hate Cameron and all modern Tories for that.
Neither does it help a business recovery???...the poor don't have a lot of money to spend
In future I will never believe any stories in the papers about poll results. Polls have become notoriously unreliable in the last 5-10 years.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539