No pathetically poor attempts at humour from coachbuster tonite? What a shame

It's a terrible word especially in public, as the person
using the vile word is automatically thought of as the person in the
right if anyone's within hearing range!

It's been used as a trump card for far to long

"when you hear the word patriot or nationalist...........just insert racist"
Go to Smith's and buy a dictionary - ****...

soon as someone comes out with the line....I am not a racist...............you know they are

Screaming, you can't have a sensible discourse about reason and common sense against an opponent who is so obviously lacking in both values. The guy is a blinkered self absorbed jackass who should be left to ask and answer his own inane ramblings.

In my opinion obviously.

I can see by the posts people hate being labelled a racist but the fact of life is....you are

kit..........I have obviously hit a nerve

why does the race of somebodys parents affect their ability to be a racist ?

i doubt there were 17 million racists, but more like 5-6 million, seems some
have found this thread

Donny, how are things in Latter Day Saintsville, and how come you are so interested in your English cousins?? how do you square the circle of associating with gambooollers and your beliefs in your supreme doctrines, mmmmmmmmmmm.

BTW,how are the nashers

Shouldn't you be more concerned with your well-known rejection of mainstream Christianity in favor of modern "prophets, seers, and revelators" high officials chosen by the lay leadership and revered by today's 14 million Mormons as virtual demigods whose words trump not only the church's adopted canon, but the Bible itself.

You are a conundrum aren't you...........

πιπιλίζουν το πουλί μου, HTH

great post UA

racists like portman make me sick - why do you hate whites so much?

you just cause trouble with all your narrow minded xenophobic ranting

which nasty organisation do you belong to?

If I were you portmanpark I would look a little closer to home to discover who the bigots are.

I'm not protesting at all just posting that I think you're the bigot.

Anyway that's my last word as life's too short to get involved with this petty small mindedness. You lost get over it.

Brexit is an English nationalist revolution

Stiff upper lips part and release wild and inarticulate cry of rage and triumph


The English always prided themselves on not doing revolutions.
Their last one, in 1688, was, for them, a curiously polite affair: the blood flowed at Aughrim and the Boyne, but not in East Anglia or Bristol.
The self-image of English conservatives is one of slow, careful, moderate change. And now, ironically, the very people who claim to revere this heritage have staged a sudden, reckless, leap-in-the-dark coup. The country that prides itself on sober moderation has made one of the most impulsive moves ever undertaken in a developed democracy. The stiff upper lips have parted and released a wild and inarticulate cry of rage and triumph.
Make no mistake: this is an English nationalist revolution.
At its heart are all of the things the English used to see as the province of other, less rational, nations: identity, difference, the deep passions of belonging and resentment. It did not, in the end, matter that no one on the Brexit side could articulate a coherent economic case for leaving the EU. It did not even matter that those who will take over from David Cameron will be right-wing market fundamentalists whose policies will deepen the very inequalities and alienation that have driven working class voters towards Leave. It did not even matter that the very entity in whose name independence is being claimed — the United Kingdom — is surely doomed by Brexit.
What mattered was what always matters in nationalist revolutions: the appeal of Us against Them.
It helped the Leave campaign enormously that Them is both tangible and abstract, both very near and quite far away.
It is, on the one hand, the visible faces of large numbers of immigrants and, on the other, the faceless bureaucracy in Brussels. These were perfect targets for resentment, not least because they can’t answer back. Immigrants and bureaucrats were not on anybody’s campaigning platform. It was easy to turn them into sinister forces bent on crowding the English out of their own homeland and binding them in chains of red tape.
And it helped, too, that the European Union really is in a terrible state, that the passing of the generation of European leaders who experienced the second World War has left a vacuum where visionary leadership ought to be. Painting the EU as a failed project is grossly simplistic, but there is enough truth in this crude portrait for people to recognise the likeness.
It helped, finally and most ironically of all, that the same Conservative Party whose internal disputes created this historic moment, is governing with the very limited legitimacy that 35 per cent of the vote confers. Britain’s unreformed first-past-the-post electoral system has left huge parts of the population feeling democratically irrelevant and unrepresented. However much one might be repelled by Ukip, it is obvious that when four million people vote for party and it gets just a single MP, Westminster itself becomes Them for many voters.
But if the Them side of the nationalist equation is strong, the Us side is dangerously weak.
This is a revolution that has scarcely spoken its own name. The English nationalism that fueled it was not explicitly on the table — it was cloaked in talk of Britain and the UK, as if those historically-constructed entities would be unshaken by the earthquake of Brexit. The English have no modern experience of national independence and the referendum campaign articulated no vision of what an independent England will actually look like.
The key word in the pro-Brexit rhetoric was “back” – take back control; take back our country. Insofar as there is any vision behind the revolution, it is nostalgic. There is the illusion that England will now go back to the way it used to be — a vigorous world power with a secure sense of its own identity that stands defiantly alone.
It’s a used-to-be that arguably never was and that certainly is not going to be restored.
In looking for security and stability, the English have launched themselves into one of the most unstable and uncertain periods in their modern history.

Still no answer to my question. I would have guessed I'm an eastern European who voted out through resentment at the British nicking the top 20% of our workforce to do the worst 20% of their own jobs.

But if I'm in fact a UK national resentful at eastern Europeans for ... oh I give up.

get it all out !

In answer to any of your future posts.zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Britain held a referendum in 1975 to see whether the public wished to stay in the European Community 'Common Market'.

How come precisely NONE of the 'Leave' voters during that era were routinely described as 'racists' and 'fascists' ?   What was different about them in those days?

Ian McKellen rejects Brexit: 'If you’re gay, you’re an internationalist'

Brexit could be seen as homophobic as well.